State of Conservation
94
Reports
29
Properties
23
States Parties
Table View
List view
Statistics
Map
Excel file
All SOC (Zip file)Threats* :
India
Read 
Belarus
Poland
Year: 2009
Other Threats: a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movements
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Belarus Poland
Year: 2008
Other Threats: a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movements
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Belarus Poland
Year: 2007
Other Threats: a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movements
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Belarus Poland
Year: 2006
Other Threats: a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movement
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Belarus Poland
Year: 2005
Other Threats: a) Effect on forest biomes through drainage of agricultural land on the Belarus side and a reservoir on the Polish side;
b) Presence of an artificial fence along the international boundary impeding large mammal movement.
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Canada
South Africa
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
South Africa
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add
South Africa
Year: 2006
Other Threats: Essential management activities such as the removal of invasive alien species and controlled burning cannot be carried out as required
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Sri Lanka
Nepal
Viet Nam
Year: 1994
Other Threats: Fire
Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/06
Solomon Islands
Year: 2015
Danger List: Yes
Document Source: WHC-15/39.COM/7A.Add,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev
Solomon Islands
Year: 2014
Danger List: Yes
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7A
Solomon Islands
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7B
Solomon Islands
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Solomon Islands
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/07B
GabonProperties
Categories
Regions
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
