State of Conservation
34
Reports
11
Properties
11
States Parties
Table View
List view
Statistics
Map
Excel file
All SOC (Zip file)Threats* :
United States of America
Year: 2003
Danger List: Yes
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/07A
Read United States of America
Year: 2002
Danger List: Yes
Document Source: WHC.02/CONF.202/18
United States of America
Year: 2001
Danger List: Yes
Document Source: WHC.01/CONF.205/04,WHC.01/CONF.208/09
United States of America
Year: 2000
Danger List: Yes
Document Source: WHC.00/CONF.202/04,WHC.00/CONF.204/09
United States of America
Year: 1999
Danger List: Yes
Document Source: WHC.99/CONF.209/13
United States of America
Year: 1998
Danger List: Yes
Document Source: WHC.98/CONF.203/07
United States of America
Year: 1997
Danger List: Yes
Document Source: WHC.97/CONF.208/08A
United States of America
Year: 1996
Danger List: Yes
Document Source: WHC.96/CONF.202/02B,WHC.96/CONF.201/07A
United States of America
Year: 1995
Danger List: Yes
Document Source: WHC.95/CONF.203/05,WHC.95/CONF.201/04,WHC.95/CONF.203/05 Add.1
United States of America
Year: 1994
Danger List: Yes
Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/06 Add,WHC.94/CONF.003/06
Pakistan
Viet Nam
India
Year: 2015
Other Threats: vulnerabilities of certain individual structures within the forts requiring short-term conservation actions
Document Source: WHC-15/39.COM/7B
Paraguay
Argentina
Brazil
Year: 1999
Other Threats: Aggressive natural environment
Document Source: WHC.99/CONF.204/05,WHC.99/CONF.209/14
Kenya
Year: 2010
Other Threats: Lack of adequate sewerage, waste disposal, and overall infrastructure, and risk to limited fresh water supplies;
Fire
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add.2
Ethiopia
Nepal
South AfricaProperties
Categories
Regions
States Parties
Argentina Brazil Ethiopia India Kenya Nepal Pakistan Paraguay South Africa United States of America Viet NamThreats
Industrial areas (34)* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
