State of Conservation
37
Reports
14
Properties
12
States Parties
Threats* :
Peru
Year: 2007
Other Threats: destabilisation of one of the main structures
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Peru
Year: 2006
Other Threats: Growth of native vegetation (Pinkuyo), the roots of which destabilize the foundations
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Ghana
Year: 1998
Other Threats: Salt-laden atmosphere
Document Source: WHC.98/CONF.203/08Rev
Ghana
Year: 1996
Other Threats: Salt-laden atmosphere
Document Source: WHC.96/CONF.202/02B
Pakistan
Year: 2007
Other Threats: Significant decay of the property caused by the local climatic conditions
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Pakistan
Year: 2006
Other Threats: poor state of conservation
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Chile
Year: 2015
Danger List: Yes
Other Threats: Extremely fragile nature of the industrial buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, in addition to stucco and lightweight construction;
Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years; Corrosion of metal cladding and dismantlement of some of the structural elements. A few buildings such as the Leaching House are liable to structural collapse if no support is given; Very little conservation work carried out
Document Source: WHC-15/39.COM/7A
Chile
Year: 2014
Danger List: Yes
Other Threats: a) Extremely fragile nature of the industrial buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, in addition to stucco and lightweight construction; b) Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years; c) Corrosion of metal cladding and dismantlement of some of the structural elements. A few buildings such as the Leaching House are liable to structural collapse if no support is given; d) Very little conservation work carried out
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7A
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.