<
 
 
 
 
×
>
You are viewing an archived web page, collected at the request of United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) using Archive-It. This page was captured on 04:36:53 Dec 30, 2015, and is part of the UNESCO collection. The information on this web page may be out of date. See All versions of this archived page.
Loading media information hide
  UNESCO.ORG The Organization Education Natural Sciences Social & Human Sciences Culture Communication & Information
Gender Equality and Development


 
 
Workshop on "The Research/Policy Nexus for Women's Human Rights"
Prev News 5 of 17 Next
International Forum on the Social Science-Policy Nexus, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 20 - 24 February 2006

In the wake of the women’s movement of the second wave (1960s/1970s), academic research has shown how gender relations are inscribed in laws and norms, cultural practices, social relationships, and collective action, and in social institutions such as markets, state systems, family norms, educational systems and in the media. Some of the findings of this research have found their way into international instruments that spell out a clear mandate for the United Nations system to work towards the realization of gender equality and the human rights of women. These instruments also require compliance by governments, in order that women’s empowerment across social, political, economic, and cultural domains may be realized.

Within UNESCO, the Gender Equality and Development (GED) Section of the Social and Human Sciences Sector conducts and supports policy-oriented research on globalization and women’s human rights, cultures and gender equality, and conflict, peace, and reconstruction. Specific studies investigate the social rights of working women, family laws, and women’s roles in post-conflict reconstruction. Capacity-building includes technical assistance for women’s studies in the African Great Lakes region and in Afghanistan, and the establishment of women’s research and documentation centers in the Palestine Authority and the Democratic Republic of Congo. The work is guided by international instruments such as the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action. Policy-oriented research commissioned by GED is intended for use by our partners within academia, the women’s movement, and the national machinery for women, such as the Ministries of Women’s Affairs.

This publication reports on the GED workshop on Women’s Human Rights: The Research-Policy Nexus, which was part of the larger International Forum on the Social Science-Policy Nexus (IFSP) that took place in Buenos Aires, Argentina, on 20-24 February 2006. Organized in conjunction with the Governments of Argentina and Uruguay, the municipalities and universities of Buenos Aires, Córdoba, Montevideo and Rosario, and with the support of a wide range of academic, policy, and NGO partners, the Forum offered an innovative space for a new kind of dialogue, bringing together social science and policy in the search for a common language and shared terms of engagement. The more than 2000 participants included 13 Ministers of Social Development and Education from Africa, Asia and Latin America; five Secretaries General of regional organizations; government representatives and local authorities; students and professors; project representatives, and members of civil society. As Peruvian Minister of Women and Social Development, Ana María Romero-Lozada noted during the closing ceremony: “The Forum is aiming for three essential results. The first is to propose a diagnosis on current collaboration between researchers and policy makers in order to identify their strengths and weaknesses comparatively and transversally with regard to the five themes of the Forum. Second, the Forum has highlighted a certain number of problems that restrain or paralyze the creation of the Nexus. On the basis of this diagnosis, the Forum aspires to propose recommendations that will emphasize the strategy needed to overcome the existing gap.”

The workshop explored the relationship between academic research and public policies towards gender equality and women’s empowerment. Key questions were: How does research assist in policy design or reform? What kinds of relations exist between researchers, activists, and policy makers in various countries? How might policy and decision-makers such as Ministers of Women’s Affairs make better use of the academic research on various aspects on women’s conditions and rights? How might researchers and advocates for women’s human rights help build the capacity of ministries of women’s affairs by providing them with important inputs for the policy work of the ministries?

The workshop had a two-fold purpose. First, it was to contribute to the larger Forum and explore the ways in which the work on gender in SHS is deliberately and methodically located at the intersection of social science research, on the one hand, and policy dialogues and formulations pertaining to women’s human rights, on the other. Second, it was to bring together academics and policy-makers to discuss policy-oriented research around the three broad themes of our work on gender:

  • globalization processes (economic and political) and their impact on women’s human rights; the objective being to help make globalization work for women;
  • how cultural practices and institutions may impede women’s rights and gender equality, but also how cultural resources may be used by activists and policy-makers to legitimize legal reforms and policy measures;
  • how women’s perspectives and feminist scholarship can contribute to new thinking and policies pertaining to prevention and resolution of conflict, meaningful peace-building, and post-conflict reconstruction and governance; the objective being to contribute to the promotion of SCR 1325 on women, peace and security.


The workshop presentations were organized around these three themes, which took place in three sessions over a day and a half, and consisted of a total of nine presentations. The workshop took place at the Centro Cultural de la Cooperacion, and there were close to 35 persons in attendance (not including the speakers) at the morning and afternoon sessions of the first day. This group included five men, two of whom posed questions. At the third session, 22 persons were counted.

The nine papers were presented in 30-45 minute slots, four of which were power point presentations, and there was at least one hour of rich discussion following the presentations.

Research – Activism – Policy

As far as women’s human rights or a feminist perspective is concerned, there is a third element in the formulation “research-policy linkage” and that is “activism”. As Professor Yakin Erturk, Turkish sociologist and currently the UN rapporteur on violence against women has argued, much UN work on women’s human rights has been the result of the following equation: theory – praxis – policy. Thus most of the IFSP Women’s Human Rights workshop participants were or had been activists as well as academics or policy-makers.

Tensions certainly exist between social science research and policy-making, and between activists and policy-makers. These tensions are well-known and sometimes result in mutual hostility and non-cooperation. The purpose of the Forum and of the workshop was to emphasize synergy and positive interactions. Tensions also may be regarded as productive and healthy; they may generate critical thinking, creative solutions, and innovations. The research-policy nexus should not be interpreted as dependence of one on the other. It is important that the social sciences remain independent and free from the influences of the market or the state. While social science research is always problem-driven, it should not be policy-driven. Historical and meta-theoretical work should continue, and universities should continue to be funded. The onus is on policy-makers to ensure that the policies they formulate or adopt are based on sound research; they should actively take part in research-policy networks that are created at international, regional, and national levels. Academics also could identify particular policies in need of reconsideration or reform, and organize dialogues with policy-makers and other stakeholders.

The GED workshop on The Research-Policy Nexus in Women’s Human Rights was very successful in terms of substance/content, consistency with the Forum theme, and the workshop’s objectives, which were to underscore the links among social science research, activism, and policies pertaining to women’s rights and gender equality; networking among the participating individuals and institutions; and greater awareness of the gender research carried out within SHS.


Co-ordinator: Valentine Moghadam

Related Links:









Author(s) UNESCO
Publication Date 19-07-2006
Source UNESCO



  Email this page     Printable version



 
  Email this page
 Printable version
  Resources
Who's who?
News
Projects
Publications
Legal Instruments
Websites:
  • UNESCO
  • IGOs / NGOs
  • Research Tools
  • Archives