<
 
 
 
 
×
>
You are viewing an archived web page, collected at the request of United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) using Archive-It. This page was captured on 20:29:11 Dec 05, 2017, and is part of the UNESCO collection. The information on this web page may be out of date. See All versions of this archived page.
Loading media information hide
  1. Home
  2. ifcd
  3. Results
×

Warning message

  • Missing Feeds plugin FeedsExcelParser. Please contact your site administrator.
  • Missing Feeds plugin FeedsJSONPathParser. Please contact your site administrator.

FIDC I Résultats du dernier cycle

Project ID: 2017-52
Name of applicant:
Association for the support and promotion of culture Contineo 2020
Pays du demandeur:
ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine
Type de demandeur:
NGO
Amount requested:
96.140,00
Beneficiary country(ies):
Bosnie-Herzégovine, Monténégro, Serbie, ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine
Statut:
Non Elegible
Note totale: 0

IFCD Application form - Anonymous - 04/13/2017 - 02:20

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/13/2017 - 02:20
Soumission information
Veuillez lire et approuver les conditions générales ci-dessous :: 
Commit to respect the provisions of paragraph 25 of the Guidelines.
Acknowledge that, in the case of approval, a funding contract will be signed both by UNESCO and the applicant.
Certify that all information contained in this application is truthful. I also certify that any documents provided in support of my application are authentic and accurate.
Date: 
2017
Nom complet du représentant du demandeur comme signature: 
Bojana Stojmenovska

IFCD Submissions details

Présélection | Formulaire d'examen de la Commission nationale

IFCD Preselection form - Natcom The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia - 05/29/2017 - 12:13

Submitted by Natcom The form... on Mon, 05/29/2017 - 12:13
1. Nom et coordonnées du responsable de la Commission nationale pour l’UNESCO
Titre: 
Ms
Nom: 
Topuzovska
Prénom: 
Lidija
Fonction: 
Secretary General of Macedonian National Commission for UNESCO
Adresse: 
Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Macedonia, Gjuro Gjakovic no.61
Code postal: 
1000
Ville: 
Skopje
Téléphone: 
+389 2 3240 517, +389 2 3240 591
2. Justification de présélection
Quelles sont les raisons principales qui ont motivé la présélection de ce projet en comparaison avec d’autres propositions reçues par la Commission nationale pour l’UNESCO ?: 
The projects is unique and has an innovative approach to assembling the majority of the participants active in the cultural scene in Macedonia and three other eligible countries (Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro). Creating CultuReg will be of great importance for creating national policies in the future, as it is already explained in the project. There is a fast growing alternative scene that has a great potential for socio-economic improvement, however not belonging to an entity or established group imposes serious limitations that could eventually put individuals or various forms of collectives in the idle stage or push them out of the market. Moreover, a database which includes individuals and groups which work with new forms of artistic expression that are not traditionally classified as ‘art’ will open new possibilities for the local market.
3. L'institution/organisation demandeuse
Quels éléments montrent que l’institution/organisation demandeuse est une partie prenante importante du secteur de la culture (aux niveaux local / national / international) ?: 
Having a proved experience of four years organization of one of the biggest art fairs in Macedonia, the International Fair of Contemporary Art Paratissima Skopje, with significant numbers of national and international participants, Contineo 2020 is an already established stakeholder in the cultural scene with whom the Ministry of Culture has very positive cooperation in the last several years and has provided (financial) support. The organization has a vast network of collaborators from different direct and indirect subjects active in the cultural and artistic sector and has been recognized as one of the key stakeholders who are contributing to the shaping of the national scene, being referred to for expertise by new and ongoing initiatives present in the country.
4. Pertinence de la proposition de projet présélectionnée
4.1. Quels sont actuellement les principaux besoins et priorités de votre pays en termes de politiques culturelles et/ou d’industries culturelles ?: 
The cultural policies and cultural industries in Macedonia have a great potential however, they need systematizing and clustering in order for the potential to surface and develop. Among the priorities in Macedonia, related to the cultural policies and cultural industries, is the need to clarify the status of the participants and be able to access their past, current and future projects in order to better understand the level of development of these individuals and/or organizations. Other priorities include the need to facilitate access to funding sources, diversification of the contents available in the representative institutions (galleries, museums, etc) and stimulate the ‘supply and demand’ exchange among the audience and the artists. These priorities are apparent if we consider the Ministry of Culture’s choice of funded initiatives which fall under the category ‘projects national interest’ organized by other entities which are not public/national institutions but are managed by the civil society sector.
4.2. De quelle manière les objectifs de cette proposition de projet présélectionnée répondent-ils aux besoins et aux priorités actuelles du pays en termes de politiques et/ou d’industries culturelles ?: 
The national institutions are already in the process of formulating strategies for the cultural industries and establishing the national cultural policies; throughout this process they have recognized the necessity to establish close collaboration with the civil society sector, considering it as one of their crucial ally in the mapping of new and diverse formats of cultural engagement. In this sense CultuReg is a welcomed initiative which shares common goals among all partaking entities in the country, especially considering its open source format and accessibility. The benefit of the projects’ objectives is common because the CultuReg will initiate its process based on the information available and published by the public institutions and will complement it with additional and more extensive data regarding participants from traditional and alternative cultural and artistic industries, which in return the public institutions will use for improving their current and future policies.
4.3. Dans quelle mesure pensez-vous que cette proposition de projet présélectionnée aura un impact sur les politiques et/ou industries culturelles du pays ?: 
This initiative is the first of its kind coming from the civil sector and engaging with the cultural industries and policies; therefore our evaluation is that according to the formulation of the project and the partnerships and regional development noted, the applicant has an accurate perception of the sectors’ necessities and a clear vision of what data will contribute to fruitful developments of the national strategies and policies related to culture and the creative industries.
5. Faisabilité de la proposition de projet présélectionnée
5.1. Quels éléments démontrent la capacité organisationnelle du demandeur et sa compétence pour mettre en œuvre le plan de travail et gérer le budget ?: 
As already mentioned, Contineo 2020 team has proven track of active participation in the field of cultural and art industries. They are successfully organizing the International Fair of Contemporary Art Paratissima Skopje, and are already an established brand that is recognized by the other participants in the field of culture. In particular, they are invited to similar events to give public speeches and testimonials about their experience of reaching out to mass public, engaging new audiences and creating new and innovative environments for the prosperity and merging of emerging and established actors on the market. Their approach to collaborations which includes the involvement of all stakeholders public, private and individual is a system which speaks for their capacity and experience in generating results. At the same time, they have already implemented a self-evaluation which has led them to understand the need for additional research and methodology capacities, so they have established cooperation with a research think-tank organization that can give full support in all the stages of the project, so that the CultuReg will satisfy practitioners as well as analyst and policy needs.
5.2. Quels types de procédures ont été prévus par le demandeur pour assurer la responsabilité financière ?: 
We have evaluated the budget; all the units in it are related to the execution of the project. Contracting expenses related to IT and marketing agency are accurate. The plan for regular external auditing is also in place.
7. Processus de présélection au niveau national

Lidija Topuzovska

Nom: 
Lidija Topuzovska
Organization: 
Macedonian National Commission for UNESCO
Poste: 
Secretary General
Date: 
Lundi 29 mai 2017
En tant que signature, entrez le nom complet du représentant de la Commission nationale :: 
Mrs. Lidija Topuzovska, Secretary General

IFCD Submissions details

Recevabilité | Examen technique

IFCD Eligibility form - n_ametller - 10/30/2017 - 16:47

Submitted by n_ametller on Mon, 10/30/2017 - 16:47
Statut recevabilité: 
Non eligible
Reasons for non-eligibility: 
- The proposed project focuses on the creation of a database and therefore falls outside the relevant areas of intervention for the IFCD. In accordance with paragraph 7.1 of the Operational Guidelines for the IFCD, “Funds will be allocated for projects that: introduce and/or develop policies and strategies that have a direct effect on the creation, production, distribution, and access to a diversity of cultural goods, services and activities; and strengthen corresponding institutional infrastructure, including professional capacities and organizational structures, deemed necessary to support viable local and regional cultural industries and markets in developing countries”.
Examen Technique
Le formulaire de demande a été soumis avant la date limite: 
Yes
Formulaire de demande soumis en français ou anglais: 
Yes
Le montant maximum demandé est inférieur ou égal à $E.U. 100.000: 
Yes
La période de mise en œuvre du projet se situe entre 12 et 24 mois: 
Yes
Toutes les sections du formulaire ont été complétées: 
Yes
Signature du demandeur: 
Yes
Le demandeur n'a pas un projet financé par le FIDC en cours: 
Yes
Le projet s’inscrit dans les domaines d'intervention du FIDC: 
No