State of Conservation
25
Reports
2
Properties
1
States Parties
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Need for a comprehensive rehabilitation programme |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Need for a comprehensive rehabilitation programme |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for a comprehensive rehabilitation programme |
Properties
Categories
Regions
States Parties
LithuaniaThreats
Management systems/ management plan (16) Oil and gas (11) Housing (9) Surface water pollution (7) Erosion and siltation/ deposition (5) Solid waste (4) Ground transport infrastructure (3) Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation (3) Marine transport infrastructure (2) Localised utilities (2) Pollution of marine waters (2) Deliberate destruction of heritage (2) Illegal activities (2) Legal framework (2) Major linear utilities (1) Storms (1) Financial resources (1) Management activities (1)
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.