<
 
 
 
 
×
>
You are viewing an archived web page, collected at the request of United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) using Archive-It. This page was captured on 18:32:37 Jun 21, 2019, and is part of the UNESCO collection. The information on this web page may be out of date. See All versions of this archived page.
Loading media information hide
Nuevo correo electrónico del FIDC: convention2005.ifcd@unesco.org
Project ID: 2018-953
Name of applicant:
Municipal Administration Department of Cienfuegos
Country of applicant:
Cuba
Type of applicant:
Party
Amount requested:
94.873,00USD
Beneficiary country(ies):
Cuba
Status:
Non Recommended
Total Score: 23.5

IFCD Submissions details

Preselection | National Commissions Review

IFCD Preselection form - - 05/11/2018 - 14:40

1. Name and contact details of officer from the National Commission for UNESCO
Title: 
Mr
Family name: 
León González
Given name: 
Oscar
Position: 
President.
Address: 
Avenida Kholy,esquina A 32, Número 151, Nuevo Vedado, Plaza de la Revolución
Postcode: 
10400
Town: 
La Habana, Cuba
2. Justification of pre-selection
What are the main reasons for having pre-selected this project proposal, as compared to other proposals received by the National Commission for UNESCO?: 
Le projet fait partie des objectifs du FIDC. Il se distingue par sa vision intégre et aligné sur les agendas de développement 2030. L'approche du développement communautaire à travers les industries culturelles est importante. Il vise à créer et renforcer un espace créatif dans une localité située au centre du pays. Il contribuera à la politique culturelle de cette localité, de la municipalité et ce sera une bonne pratique qui aura un impact sur la politique nationale . Relations étroites avec d'autres projets et réseaux de l'UNESCO tels que le comité de la route des esclaves, le réseau des écoles associées à l'UNESCO de la communauté. Souligne la qualité de l'information présentée dans le projet, ainsi que toute la documentation ci-jointe.
3. The applicant institution/organization
What elements demonstrate that the applicant institution/organization is a significant stakeholder in the culture sector (locally / nationally / internationally)?: 
Les institutions municipales de la culture sont responsables de la mise en œuvre de la politique culturelle du pays à la base, dans les territoires et la communauté. Ce projet aura une contribution très importante pour la mise en œuvre de la politique culturelle et servira de référence et de bonnes pratiques pour les localités et territoires voisins.
4. Relevance of the pre-selected project proposal
4.1. What are the main current needs and priorities in your country in terms of cultural policies and/or cultural industries?: 
Continuer de renforcer les industries culturelles dans les territoires et les provinces du pays. Développer des industries créatives et des zones créatives qui intègrent la communauté, la société civile et les décideurs. Assurer l'accès des communautés de la capitale aux produits culturels pour assurer un meilleur équilibre dans le pays et ne pas se concentrer uniquement sur la capitale. Promouvoir des économies créatives à l'heure où Cuba met en œuvre un nouveau modèle économique.
4.2. How do the objectives of this pre-selected project proposal meet the current needs and priorities of the country in terms of cultural policies and/or cultural industries?: 
Les objectifs répondent positivement aux besoins que nous avons au niveau national, en fournissant un espace pour la création, la promotion des industries créatives, en impliquant la communauté dans le cadre de la mise en œuvre d'un nouveau modèle économique dans le pays.
4.3. To what extent do you expect this pre-selected project proposal to have an impact on the country’s cultural policies and/or cultural industries?: 
le projet va renforcer les industries culturelles dans le territoires du Cienguegos. Développer des industries créatives et des zones créatives qui intègrent la communauté, la société civile et les décideurs. Assurer l'accès des communautés de la capitale aux produits culturels pour assurer un meilleur équilibre dans le pays et ne pas se concentrer uniquement sur la capitale. Promouvoir des économies créatives à l'heure où Cuba met en œuvre un nouveau modèle économique.
5. Other information
Please indicate other contextual information that the IFCD Panel of Experts should take into consideration when evaluating the pre-selected project proposal.: 
Qualité de l'information présentée. Processus de consultation pour l'élaboration du projet selon les règles du FIDC. Impact sur la communauté. Nous considérons qu'il s'agit d'un projet d'un grand intérêt en raison de son impact sur la communauté. Pour être un projet loin de la capitale, qui stimulera le développement local et la création d'industries culturelles à l'heure où le pays travaille et perfectionne son modèle économique Contributions à la politique culturelle cubaine Développement de bonnes pratiques pour socialiser dans d'autres régions du pays. Renforcement des capacités. Développement industriel créatif et culturel dans le cadre de la mise en œuvre d'un nouveau moelo économique.
6. The pre-selection process at the national level

Ada Llanes

Full name: 
Ada Llanes
Organization: 
Centre de Collaboration MINCULT
Type of organization/Institution: 
Position: 
Directrice

Frank Tellez

Full name: 
Frank Tellez
Organization: 
RR.II MINCULT CUBA
Type of organization/Institution: 
Position: 
Point focal Convention du patrimoine culturel.

Oscar León González

Full name: 
Oscar León González
Organization: 
Comission national cubaine de l ´UNESCO.
Type of organization/Institution: 
Position: 
Presidente

Yahima Esquivel Moynelo

Full name: 
Yahima Esquivel Moynelo
Organization: 
Comission nationalle cubaine de la UNESCO
Type of organization/Institution: 
Position: 
Primer secretaire, especialiste Culture et Patrimanoi

Yamile Arteche

Full name: 
Yamile Arteche
Organization: 
CIERI; UNEAC
Type of organization/Institution: 
Position: 
Especialiste
Date: 
2018
Full Name of the representative of the National Commission as Signature: 
Oscar León González

IFCD Submissions details

Eligibility | Technical Assessment

IFCD Eligibility form - p-cambier - 07/12/2018 - 16:57

Eligibility Status: 
Eligible
Technical Examination
Submitted by the deadline: 
Yes
Application Form submitted either in English or French: 
Yes
Maximum amount requested is US$ 100,000 or below: 
Yes
Project implementation period is between 12 and 24 months: 
Yes
All sections of the Form are completed: 
Yes
Signature of applicant: 
Yes
The applicant does not have an ongoing IFCD funded project: 
Yes
Falls within the areas of intervention of IFCD: 
Yes
IF PARTY OR NGO
Party to the 2005 Convention from developing countries: 
Yes
National Commission Review Form: 
Yes
Signature of National Commission: 
Yes
Official document/ statutes (with English or French translation if necessary): 
Yes

IFCD Submissions details

Experts Evaluations

EVALUATION GRID
8 points The project proposal addresses perfectly all relevant aspect of the criterion under consideration. The answer provides all the information needed and there are no concerns or areas of weakness
6-7 points The proposal addressed the criterion well, although some improvements could be made. The answer gives clear information on all or nearly all of the evidence needed.
5-4 points The project proposal broadly addresses the criterion, but there are still some weaknesses. The answer gives some relevant information, but there are several areas where detail is lacking or the information is unclear.
3-2 points The project proposal does not entirely address the criterion or cannot be judged properly due to missing or incomplete information. The answer does not necessarily address the question asked, or gives very little relevant information.
1 point The project proposal barely addresses the criterion. There is a clear lack of relevant information that makes it extremely difficult to judge whether the question asked is addressed.
0 points The project proposal fails to address the criterion or cannot be assessed due to the lack of pertinent information. The answer does not address the question asked, or does not provide relevant information.

Sub-Total Expert 1 : 11.5

IFCD Expert Evaluation form - - 07/16/2018 - 18:31

Brief summary of the project: 
This project proposes to build community development through the cultural entrepreneurship of 300 selected beneficiaries. The program will take place mainly in the city of Cienfuegos as well as in several other towns in Cuba and will be linked to several other important national and international cultural projects and organizations
1. RELEVANCE AND APPROPRIATENESS OF THE PROJECT TO THE OBJECTIVES AND AREAS OF INTERVENTION OF THE IFCD
1.1 Please describe how the project objectives and proposed impact/long-term benefits are aligned with at least one of the IFCD’s outcomes and associated expected results.: 
The project objectives are aligned with outcome 3. For 3.1, innovation and new business models it is not clear what these will be. Concerning capacity building (3.2) and participation (3.3), the proposed programs are quite explicit
1.2 How do the objectives of this project proposal meet the current needs and priorities of the country/ region in terms of cultural policies and/or cultural industries?: 
The objectives are in line with the needs of the country to develop their creative industries sector, especially in areas other than the capital city.
1.3 To what extent are the project’s objectives specific and measurable?: 
The objectives are too general and thus difficult to measure. They should be more focused which would then bring more clarity to the outputs and activities
1.4 To what extent does the project contribute to the promotion of gender equality, the empowerment of youth, South-South and North-South-South cooperation and/or the participation of various groups in the areas of intervention of the IFCD?: 
According to the application, out of the 300 direct beneficiaries 78% will be young people and 68% women.
Score: 
5
2. FEASIBILITY OF THE PROJECT, AS WELL AS THE RELEVANCE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF ITS MODALITIES OF EXECUTION
2.1 What elements demonstrate the applicant’s organizational capacity (main activities of the institution/organization) and competence (skills and background of staff) to implement the work plan and manage the budget?: 
The applicant, the Municipal Administration Department of Cienfuegos, has extensive experience in running communitarian projects for social transformation, and there have been renowned art-based community programs, namely the Trazos LIbres project in the city’s “La Gloria” community. However, no staff members are proposed in the team description, a major question and perhaps weakness of the project.
2.2 To what extent do the activities address relevant issues? Please explain how the methodology is appropriate to achieving the objectives?: 
The activities are detailed and address relevant issues. The methodology according to IFCD submission form is on the whole well-conceived except concerning the creative industries development program and capacity building, of which there is too little detail or information
2.3 To what extent is the time frame realistic and coherent with the activities?: 
The two-year program is realistic and coherent with the activities
2.4 Have the direct and indirect beneficiaries of the project been clearly identified? To what extent are the outputs/deliverables and main activities relevant to the target beneficiaries and address their needs?: 
The direct and indirect beneficiaries have been clearly identified except that no mention is made on how they will be selected. The outputs and activities have been detailed to suit their needs
Score: 
5
3. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY
3.1 Does the budget provide for adequate resources (salaries, fees, equipment, travel, communication, etc.) necessary for success of the project? If the budget has been overestimated or underestimated, please explain how.: 
The budget is adapted to the proposed activities, but these raise a series of questions: what is the logic of having 4 test districts involving a lot of travelling and per diem for a big team (over $17 360) instead of concentrating on the target city, Cienfuegos? The substantial communication budget ($22 330) is also difficult to understand as there are no details how or what it will be used for (‘promotional activities/ Events/ Advertisements is not information enough for such a sum). The fact that there is no budget for the project staff is also not explained
3.2 What proportion of the budget is allocated to project activities versus overhead costs? Does the budget seem adequate and overhead costs estimated in compliance with the limit to a maximum of 30% of the total project budget?: 
The overhead costs provided by self-funding are reasonable and well within the IFCD limits
3.3 Does the project proposal indicate any additional financial contributions to the project, such as co-funding and/or self- funding?: 
$5000 of self-funding, no co-funding
3.4 What actions have been foreseen to ensure financial accountability (e.g. Involvement of a financial officer)?: 
The National Committee will follow the financial commitments and reports of the Cienfuegos Municipal Council.
Score : 
5
4. IMPACT AND EXPECTED RESULTS, INCLUDING POTENTIAL FOR STRUCTURAL CHANGE
4.1 Are the project’s expected outputs and/or deliverables concrete, measurable and realistic? To what extent are they likely to achieve the objectives of the project?: 
The expected outputs are concrete and measurable but unfortunately not very realistic since it is difficult to link the activities to the outputs and thus concretely to the objectives
4.2 To what extent are the main activities and the budget relevant and appropriate to achieving the intended outputs and/or deliverables?: 
The main activities and the budget are not well enough conceived or planned to achieve the intended outputs. For example, the section on the Activities begins with the involvement of ‘300 prepared beneficiaries but nothing has been said on how they are selected or ‘prepared’
4.3 To what extent is it expected that this project will have an impact/long-term benefits on the country/region’s cultural policies and/or cultural industries?: 
The idea of the project is good and if the applicant had concentrated on just one target, the city of Cienfuegos as well as the relevant objectives, outputs and activities, it would have been appropriate and no doubt feasible
4.4 To what extent does the project demonstrate potential for structural change (for example: changes in the policy environment; far-reaching changes in public and professional organizational structures; and changes in the way government and regulatory authorities do business)?: 
The project is too dispersed to bring about structural change and nothing is said about how it would affect national or local policy making except by becoming a ‘model’.
Score: 
4
5. SUSTAINABILITY
5.1 To what extent are contractors and partners involved in the implementation of the project’s activities? Has the role of each contractor and/or partner been clearly described?: 
A long list of partners is provided, mostly local governments and cultural institutions. The contractors have not been identified as such, but one can conclude that there are at least 9 contractors, 5 of whom are curiously labelled ‘restorer’, difficult to comprehend in the project description.
5.2 How does the project relate to and/or complement the work that is already being carried out in the country/region in terms of cultural policies and/or industries?: 
Very little is said about the national context except that there is a need to develop the cultural industries (with no details given on any specific needs or policies) and creative zones
5.3 What measures/steps are proposed to ensure that the project’s impact/long-term benefits can be achieved?: 
It is possible that a successful project could be a model for other Cuban cities and their cultural and creative industries development. As it stands, however, there is little chance of this happening. The applicant has responded to the question of long term objectives mainly by describing its communications strategy and repeating its objectives, which is hardly sufficient
5.4 What measures/steps are proposed to follow up with the beneficiaries of the project after its completion?: 
Further monitoring of the beneficiaries is proposed with the hope that the trained entrepreneurs will go on to encourage other creative industry and socio-cultural projects. A coordination group will also oversee a strategy named ‘A product per people’ for community cultural industries projects specific to each region, but what this exactly entails is hard to comprehend
Score: 
4
Overall evaluation: 
The idea of this project is interesting and relevant to the country and its present transformations. Unfortunately, it is much too dispersed to be feasible as it stands: the lack of an identified staff to run the project, the budget expenditure on travelling and per diems in 5 different towns, the lack of a link with cultural policies past or future. The methodology for art-based community development used is several times referred to as the ‘Trazos Libres methodology’ but no details are given on how it works. Also, the very notion of cultural industries is vague and not detailed at all throughout the project. Once again, a very worthwhile idea that should be reworked to be re-submitted.

Sub-Total Expert 2 : 12

IFCD Expert Evaluation form - C_VILLASENOR - 08/16/2018 - 07:53

Brief summary of the project: 
The project aims develop a methodology and prepare 300 entrepreneurs through a practical/theoretical program based on the experience of the “Trazos Libres” project of the Cuban artist Santiago Hermes. The project proposes that the beneficiaries will learn and reinforce skills to produce goods and services based on the new business models of the creative industry. The project will be implemented in three specific blocks of “La Gloria”, a neighborhood located in the Cienfuegos municipality. The project proposes that of the 300 beneficiaries, 70% will be young people and a 68% of women participants. The project will count with the partnership of institutions and organizations from Cuba, and universities from Mexico and the United States.
1. RELEVANCE AND APPROPRIATENESS OF THE PROJECT TO THE OBJECTIVES AND AREAS OF INTERVENTION OF THE IFCD
1.1 Please describe how the project objectives and proposed impact/long-term benefits are aligned with at least one of the IFCD’s outcomes and associated expected results.: 
ER 3.1 innovation and new business models applied to creation, production, distribution, and access to diverse cultural goods and services. After more than 50 years of applying a very specific economic development model, Cuba begins to open itself to explore other forms of economic resources production, in favor of the individuals and their communities. In this context the Municipality of Cienfuegos, based on the experience of the local artist Santiago Hermes, seeks to develop a methodology that would be building the first foundations of a long process that can lead people of "La Gloria" to produce creative goods and services, which could result in new business models and improve their wellbeing. It is very important to underline that Municipality of Cienfuegos has obtained from the Cuba´s government the benefit consisting in that of the total income generated by the sale of products and services resulting from the project, 65% will be paid back to the project itself, to be reinvested into in the producers and in the community. ER 3.2. Critical capacity development needs relating to creation, production and distribution are assessed and addressed at appropriate levels: The project aims to identify critical capacity gaps by a systematic integral diagnosis, all of which will be presented to the Municipal Culture Institution. At the same time, during the implementation process, facilitators will walk along with the beneficiaries in a collective construction that favors the knowledge transference. ER 3.3. Participation in creation, production and distribution of cultural goods and services is widened to previously excluded regions and social groups: The beneficiaries will participate in the community cleaning actions and aesthetic transformation of the “La Gloria” neighborhood, and in the production of diverse cultural goods as: artistic presentations, craft work, jewelry, murals, benches, etc. Furtherly, neighbors of “La Gloria” will be encouraged to develop new creative entrepreneurships in collaboration with other regional cultural organizations.
1.2 How do the objectives of this project proposal meet the current needs and priorities of the country/ region in terms of cultural policies and/or cultural industries?: 
The Project´s Application Form does not clearly specify the complementarity of the project with other regional or national policies or programs, instead it explains the role that some partners will be developing into the projects implementation. Nevertheless, the National Commission Review Form states that the project will continue developing and fostering creative industries in the territories and provinces of the country, contributing to communities away from the capital can begin to develop their industries cultures and access a greater variety of cultural products and services. Also, the government of Cuba is interested in the development of creative industries as part of the implementation of a new economic model.
1.3 To what extent are the project’s objectives specific and measurable?: 
The project objective number one is specific and measurable, objectives two and three are too general and can’t be easily measured.
1.4 To what extent does the project contribute to the promotion of gender equality, the empowerment of youth, South-South and North-South-South cooperation and/or the participation of various groups in the areas of intervention of the IFCD?: 
The project can contribute to widen the participation of various vulnerable groups of “La Gloria” neighborhood in the production and distribution of cultural goods produced by the community, which may be the base to create new cultural industries in the future. The project will be an opportunity for young people and women to generate income through the production and distribution of cultural goods.
Score: 
4
2. FEASIBILITY OF THE PROJECT, AS WELL AS THE RELEVANCE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF ITS MODALITIES OF EXECUTION
2.1 What elements demonstrate the applicant’s organizational capacity (main activities of the institution/organization) and competence (skills and background of staff) to implement the work plan and manage the budget?: 
The Cienfuegos Municipality has experience into community culture and art interventions. The project is inspired into the work of the visual artist Santiago Hermes who since 2009 has been working into how visual arts favorably influence community life. The project will count with the collaboration of artists with a solid background. The applicant does not demonstrate that the staff or the instructors have solid competences into the specific business skills that are required to prepare 300 people as creative industries entrepreneurs.
2.2 To what extent do the activities address relevant issues? Please explain how the methodology is appropriate to achieving the objectives?: 
Each of the activities included in the corresponding section is oriented towards the construction of the "Trazos Libres" methodology. It is noteworthy that the activities integrate a broad participation of the community in the construction of knowledge. However, although they give some examples, the applicant is not very clear in its description on the specific issues that will be dealt with in each of the stages, especially those themes that have to do with the skills and abilities that are necessary to train entrepreneurs in the areas of creative industries. The methodology of having a theoretical session followed by practices is useful and permits to have constant evaluations and to identify gaps that need to be addressed.
2.3 To what extent is the time frame realistic and coherent with the activities?: 
The time frame realistic and coherent.
2.4 Have the direct and indirect beneficiaries of the project been clearly identified? To what extent are the outputs/deliverables and main activities relevant to the target beneficiaries and address their needs?: 
The applicant adds as part of the beneficiaries to the staff members and collaborators in the project, which is not correct. Although it breaks down the number of each of the groups of participants very punctually, it is not very clear in terms of defining the profile of the participants, especially as to whether they should have some kind of background in terms of artistic expression or as novels creative entrepreneurs. The outputs are precise for the achievement of objective 1 of the project and although it is true that the description is much more specific in terms of the areas of knowledge that the methodology will cover, it is still weak in terms of including administration, organizational, marketing or commercial -among others- that are necessary for the training of entrepreneurs in the creative industries
Score: 
5
3. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY
3.1 Does the budget provide for adequate resources (salaries, fees, equipment, travel, communication, etc.) necessary for success of the project? If the budget has been overestimated or underestimated, please explain how.: 
EXP.NO. All activities.1, “Domestic travels”, cost $100, units 110. The applicant shall present a more precise explanation if the cost is for a single person or includes many people and in general where the travels are going to be. EXP.NO. 2.4.1.5, “Staff and cultural entrepreneur’s movement”, cost $500, units 10. The applicant shall present a more precise explanation if the cost is for a single person or includes many people in order to evaluate if the per-diem amount is enough or underestimated. EXP.NO. All activities.8 “cell phone payment cards”. The applicant shall specify who will be using the cards. EXP.NO. All activities.58, “Photo printing”, cost $3, units 1000. The applicant shall evaluate the convenience of buying a printer and the photo paper that its needed to print those 1000 units instead of paying for the service. EXP.NO. 1.2.1.2, “Prices to the best 6 students”, cost $90, units 12. The applicant shall explain why if six students are rewarded, there are 12 units required, and also how those students will be selected. EXP.NO. All activities 72, “Accommodation and food”, cost $35, units 172. The applicant shall specify who are going to be the beneficiaries of that expenditure and when. EX.NO. Al activities. 73. “Food fees”, cost $24 units, 288. The applicant shall specify who are going to be the beneficiaries of that expenditure and when. EXP.NO. All activities. 74, “Importation expenditures”, cost $11,344.63, units 1. That cost is too high because all the imported goods are coming from Islas Baleares. The applicant must present alternative quotations to import the same or similar goods from countries closer to Cuba and where certainly all the goods to be bought are available with the same quality, as the ones quoted in Spain; for example, Mexico, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Panama, or Colombia. The applicant must specify the institution that will be in charge of storing and controlling the consumable goods, and which institution will keep the durable goods (printers, cameras, chairs, etc.) that will be acquired with resources from the fund.
3.2 What proportion of the budget is allocated to project activities versus overhead costs? Does the budget seem adequate and overhead costs estimated in compliance with the limit to a maximum of 30% of the total project budget?: 
The applicant does not adequately classify the items of expenditure, where the amount of 26,941.66 that he establishes as overhead is not correct. Nevertheless, the overhead costs are following the limit of a maximum of 30% of the total project budget.
3.3 Does the project proposal indicate any additional financial contributions to the project, such as co-funding and/or self- funding?: 
The budget indicates a contribution of $ 5,000 for the payment of import expenses, however the total amount of this concept of expenditure is poorly calculated. Regarding the unit cost there is a deficit of $ 3,000.
3.4 What actions have been foreseen to ensure financial accountability (e.g. Involvement of a financial officer)?: 
The project´s general administration will be responsible of a Committee integrated by the Director, the Manager, the Technician Coordinator and the Secretary of the project. The Committee will be supported on the technical and economic-administrative subgroups. It is not clear who will be in charge of the accounting and daily administrative responsibilities. There´s not a staff member with an administrative/accounting background.
Score : 
4
4. IMPACT AND EXPECTED RESULTS, INCLUDING POTENTIAL FOR STRUCTURAL CHANGE
4.1 Are the project’s expected outputs and/or deliverables concrete, measurable and realistic? To what extent are they likely to achieve the objectives of the project?: 
The evaluator considers that the final outputs are unrealistic because they do not include training topics that are fundamental for the formation of creative entrepreneurs and the consequent development of creative industries. Some activities consist of artistic interventions in public spaces and others in the development of products with creative content, which can be considered as a result of a process of industrial production of goods. The evaluator understands that this project is part of the first explorations of an alternative model of economic development in Cuba but recommends that the applicant incorporates as part of the project advisors and specialists in cultural industries from the Latin American community, who could share their experience in essential issues for the development of a new business model in the area of creative entrepreneurship. In addition to the artistic and community benefit aspect that could be developed by the project, skills and abilities must be generated in each of the stages of the value chain.
4.2 To what extent are the main activities and the budget relevant and appropriate to achieving the intended outputs and/or deliverables?: 
The activities are relevant, with the limitations noted above. Although in the first instance the budget covers the main items for the development of the project, it is generally observed that although there are resources for the purchase of materials, there are no specific items for the production and logistics of the planned activities. As an example, if the presence of artistic groups in other communities is considered, it is not clear where the necessary resources will be obtained for the production of the show, and its realization where it will be presented (lighting, sound, stage, technicians, etc.)
4.3 To what extent is it expected that this project will have an impact/long-term benefits on the country/region’s cultural policies and/or cultural industries?: 
In the context of the exploration of alternative economic models in Cuba, the project can become a relevant example of a first stage of community intervention, which sensitizes the population and the authorities about the creative potentialities existing in the communities, its importance in the construction of new business opportunities and the need to establish public policies for their sustainable development.
4.4 To what extent does the project demonstrate potential for structural change (for example: changes in the policy environment; far-reaching changes in public and professional organizational structures; and changes in the way government and regulatory authorities do business)?: 
The project demonstrates potential for structural change the policy environment and the availability of economic resources into the Cienfuegos Municipality Culture Area, with the benefits and risks that this entails, especially in terms of the fact that public policy ends up privileging only those activities that can potentially generate an economic return to the detriment of those that are less likely to achieve it.
Score: 
5
5. SUSTAINABILITY
5.1 To what extent are contractors and partners involved in the implementation of the project’s activities? Has the role of each contractor and/or partner been clearly described?: 
The partners will be involved into the implementation of the project´s activities. The role of partners and contractors is clearly described.
5.2 How does the project relate to and/or complement the work that is already being carried out in the country/region in terms of cultural policies and/or industries?: 
Due the transformation of the Cuba´s economic model, the project is related to the interest of the Cuban government into exploring the creative economy business models to promote sustainable development for the country´s communities, especially in those from the provinces and those far from the capital and other major cities.
5.3 What measures/steps are proposed to ensure that the project’s impact/long-term benefits can be achieved?: 
In the first place, an international financing platform will be created. With the support of universities in the United States, Mexico and France, activities will be carried out that involve the granting of economic resources for the project "Trazos Libres" and the Cuban participants. On the other hand, in collaboration with the Universities and cultural groups of Cuba, workshops, courses and consultancies will be encouraged, with experts, according to the specific needs of the communities.
5.4 What measures/steps are proposed to follow up with the beneficiaries of the project after its completion?: 
The capacities of the participants will be evaluated to manage the economic, environmental, social, and cultural sustainability of the territories every two months. The necessary regulatory measures will be taken to guarantee the preservation of the material and immaterial results of the Creative Zone Trazos Libres and it will be promoted that it be a space of inter-institutional confluence and of the organizations, not only for economic projects, but also of those with social impact. The Group Coordinator will promote the development of a "Products for People" strategy that allows differentiating and singling them out on the Cuban map.
Score: 
6
Overall evaluation: 
The project consists of generating a methodology of social intervention, in an area of migrant and vulnerable population of the Municipality of Cienfuegos. Although the stated purpose is to train 300 people (within a community of approximately 9,600 inhabitants) as creative entrepreneurs, the theoretical and practical activities are mainly geared to demonstrate the positive influence of the arts in the community, to the elaboration of products with content creative, to systematize an initial methodology of public intervention in the community and the creation of the first bases of an alternative model of income generation for the municipality and the communities. Thus, for the project to effectively achieve the goal of training 300 entrepreneurs, the applicant must incorporate some other theoretical topics and practical activities, which are essential for the training to be effectively oriented to the training of creative entrepreneurs: analysis of market, product development, marketing, admission, use of new technologies, etc. The applicant also needs to adjust the budget and expressly include within the staff the person who will be responsible for the day-to-day administration of the project and the accounting records. It is a minor correction, but the applicant must also adjust the execution period to the maximum of two years authorized in the regulations of the fund. For all the above, it is suggested that the promoter make the suggested adjustments and present the project again in the next call.

IFCD Submissions details

Recommandation review

IFCD Recommendation form - j_casas - 11/13/2018 - 10:06

Recommendation Status: 
Non recommended
Evaluation summary: 
This project presents a program to build community development through the cultural entrepreneurship of 300 selected beneficiaries to take place mainly in the Cuban city of Cienfuegos, with links to several other important national and international projects, in line with the Cuban government’s wish to develop new creative business models. The objective to train 300 people in the creative industries corresponds to IFCD outcomes, but it is the planned methodology that posed a problem to the evaluators. First, the project’s objectives are too general and thus difficult to measure. Secondly, the applicant is not clear enough in the description of the creative industry development program, or the selection in terms of professional skills of the beneficiaries for the capacity building program. Furthermore, the budget needs to be revised as it makes no allowance for staff salaries and raises the question of the dispersion of the activities and expenditures (‘test cities’) rather than concentrating for this project on one ‘pilot city’. Furthermore, the contractors are included in the overhead section, and the communications budget is somewhat overestimated. Indeed, if the applicant wishes to reapply for IFCD funding, there are detailed comments in the two evaluations on how to amend and improve the budget presentation.