<
 
 
 
 
×
>
You are viewing an archived web page, collected at the request of United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) using Archive-It. This page was captured on 00:02:17 Jun 25, 2019, and is part of the UNESCO collection. The information on this web page may be out of date. See All versions of this archived page.
Loading media information hide
English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
8
Reports
2
Properties
1
States Parties
States Parties:  Canada
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Localised utilities
States Parties:  Canada
Year:  2017
Document Source:  WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Other Threats: Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge
States Parties:  Canada
Year:  2015
Document Source:  WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Water infrastructure
States Parties:  Canada
Year:  1992
Document Source:  CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/12
Threats*: Localised utilities Water infrastructure
Other Threats: Bison herd infected with either tuberculosis and/or brucellosis
States Parties:  Canada
Year:  1991
Document Source:  SC-91/CONF.002/4 Add.
Threats*: Localised utilities Water infrastructure
Other Threats: Bison herd infected with either tuberculosis and/or brucellosis
States Parties:  Canada
Year:  1990
Document Source:  CC-90/CONF.004/13
Threats*: Localised utilities Water infrastructure
Other Threats: Bison herd infected with either tuberculosis and/or brucellosis
States Parties:  Canada
Year:  1989
Document Source:  SC-89/CONF.003/2,SC-89/CONF.004/5,SC-89/CONF.003/12,SC-89/CONF.004/12
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: 50% of the bison herd infected with either tuberculosis and/or brucellosis
States Parties:  Canada
Year:  1985
Document Source:  SC-85/CONF.008/9
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Properties
Categories

Regions
States Parties
Canada

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.