State of Conservation
8
Reports
2
Properties
1
States Parties
Table View
List view
Statistics
Map
Excel file
All SOC (Zip file)Threats* :
| States Parties: |
 Pakistan
|
| Year: | 1997 |
| Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
| Threats*: | Flooding |
| Other Threats: | Deterioration of the bricks due to salt crystallization and hydration |
| States Parties: |
Pakistan
|
| Year: | 1995 |
| Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4 |
| Threats*: | Flooding |
| Other Threats: | Deterioration of the bricks due to salt crystallization and hydration |
| States Parties: |
Pakistan
|
| Year: | 1991 |
| Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/3 |
| Threats*: | Flooding |
| Other Threats: | Deterioration of the bricks due to salt crystallization and hydration |
| States Parties: |
Pakistan
|
| Year: | 2017 |
| Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Other climate change impacts |
| Other Threats: | Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb |
| States Parties: |
Pakistan
|
| Year: | 2016 |
| Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Other climate change impacts |
| Other Threats: | Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb |
| States Parties: |
Pakistan
|
| Year: | 2015 |
| Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Other climate change impacts |
| Other Threats: | Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb |
| States Parties: |
Pakistan
|
| Year: | 2013 |
| Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Other climate change impacts |
| Other Threats: | Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb |
| States Parties: |
Pakistan
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Other climate change impacts |
| Other Threats: | Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb |
Properties
Categories
Regions
States Parties
Pakistan
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
