Par année
[Uniquement en anglais] The Committee elected by acclamation Mr. Firouz Bagherzadeh (Iran) as its Chairman.
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
Pays : Iran (République islamique d')
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
Pays : Iran (République islamique d')
[Uniquement en anglais] A member of the Committee proposed that Rule 12 of the Provisional Rules of Procedure should be amended to provide for the election of four Vice-Chairmen. This proposal was supported by two members and adopted by the Committee. The Committee then proceeded to elect by acclamation the representatives of the Arab Republic of Egypt, France, Nigeria and Poland, as Vice-Chairmen, and Peter H. Bennett (Canada) as Rapporteur.
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
[Uniquement en anglais] The Chairman invited the members of the Committee to examine the Provisional Agenda prepared by the Secretariat. The representative of the Director-General proposed that an item on "other matters" be added to the Agenda; under this item would be considered the offer of collaboration from the International Organization for the Protection of Works of Art (document CC-77/CONF.OO1/5) and the proposed donation of Professor Badawy (document CC-77/CONF.OO1/7). He also suggested that the methods of work of the Committee should not be discussed separately but rather in ...
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
[Uniquement en anglais] In reply to a suggestion that the Rules of Procedure should be examined by a working group which would report back to the Committee at a later plenary meeting, the Legal Adviser stated that, in the absence of a text formally approved by the Committee, the Provisional Rules of Procedure would prevail and he therefore proposed that they be examined at an early plenary meeting; this would not prevent the Committee from amending the Rules of procedure at a later stage, if necessary. He added that the Rules of Procedure would probably only assume their final form after ...
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
[Uniquement en anglais] Several amendments were proposed to bring greater clarity to the text or to reflect more closely the terms of the Convention. The Rules relating to the election of officers and to the voting procedures gave rise to some comment.
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
[Uniquement en anglais] With respect to the eligibility for re-election of members of the Bureau, participants considered that, although rotation in the membership of the Bureau was necessary, continuity in the work of the Committee was of paramount importance. Various proposals followed, some providing for re-election of all officers and others for re-election of the Vice-Chairmen and the Rapporteur only. A further proposal which sought to limit the eligibility of all officers for immediate re-election to a second term of office was finally accepted.
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
[Uniquement en anglais] An explanation was requested on the different weightings required for a majority vote under the terms of paragraphs 2 and 3 of Rule 28. The Legal Adviser referred members to paragraph 8 of Article 13 of the Convention·which stipulated that "Decisions of the Committee shall be taken by a majority of two-thirds of its members present and voting". This provision was included in an Article of the Convention dealing with substantive questions and not with procedural matters. It was therefore considered that a two-thirds majority should be required on substantive ...
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
[Uniquement en anglais] Participants requested that two points raised in connection with the Rules of Procedure be noted in the summary record. The first related to the meetings of the Committee which, in the opinion of one member, should be given wide publicity. The second concerned the suspension of the Rules of Procedure which, as confirmed by the Legal Adviser, could be initiated by any State member of the Committee.
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
[Uniquement en anglais] A corrigendum setting cut the modifications made by the Committee, as well as an amendment proposed by the representative of the Director-General to Rule 8.2, was examined at the last meeting of the Committee which then proceeded to adopt unanimously the revised text of its Rules of Procedure. (Annex II)
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
[Uniquement en anglais] Hope was expressed that sufficient information would be provided to States to enable them to select properties that were truly eligible for inclusion in the List and that the criteria adopted would assist States in restricting their choice of properties nominated. In this connection, one proposal put forward sought to impose on States a limit in the number of properties that they might submit in the first instance but, on reflection this was not considered advisable. It was, however, decided that States would be advised to limit the number of nominations submitted ...
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
[Uniquement en anglais] Several members considered that an independent assessment by experts of the nominations submitted would be essential and it was proposed that the nominations should be transmitted, for comments and evaluation, to the Rome Centre, ICOMOS or IUCN, as appropriate.
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
[Uniquement en anglais] One member considered that States not Parties to the Convention should be able to have properties nominated by a State Party for inclusion in the List. Other participants inquired about the possibility of nominating properties not situated in national territories, such as international sites, for instance the United Nations building in New York, or regions such as Antarctica. However, it was pointed out that the Convention was very explicit in this respect, Article II referring to the submission by each State Party of inventories of properties situated in its ...
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
[Uniquement en anglais] The Committee then proceeded to examine the working document paragraph by paragraph and to put forward their comments which would be taken into account by the drafting committee in formulating the decisions taken by the Committee.
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
CONF 001 VI.A(b).25
[Uniquement en anglais] General Principles relating to the establishment of the World Heritage List
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
CONF 001 VI.A(c).29
[Uniquement en anglais] Criteria for the inclusion of cultural properties in the World Heritage List
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
CONF 001 VI.A(f).38
[Uniquement en anglais] Procedure and calendar for the submission of nominations
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
CONF 001 VI.A(f).39
[Uniquement en anglais] Procedure and calendar for the submission of nominations
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
CONF 001 VI.A(f).40
[Uniquement en anglais] Procedure and calendar for the submission of nominations
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
[Uniquement en anglais] With respect to the granting of international assistance, it was suggested that, in view of the limited funds available, a fixed maximum sum should be made available for each project. This would be difficult, responded another participant, since each case would have to be considered separately in the light of resources available under the Fund and arrangements for complementary financing. Another proposed that such decisions should be taken on the basis of an annual budget submitted to the Committee at each session.
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
[Uniquement en anglais] On the basis of resources available in the World Heritage Fund, the Secretariat proposed in document CC-77/CONF.001/6, a budget covering (i) the preparation of model nomination files, (ii) technical co-operation to States Parties in preparing their nominations and requests for assistance, and (iii) emergency assistance required before the next session of the Committee.
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977
Session : 1ère session du Comité du patrimoine mondial (CONF 001)
Année : 1977