| Diversidad de las expresiones culturales

Project ID: 2019-2181

Name of applicant:

Istanbul Foundation for Culture and Arts (IKSV)

Country of applicant:

Turquía

Type of applicant:

NGO

Amount requested:

100.000,00USD

Beneficiary country(ies):

Turquía

Status:

Approved

Total Score: 33

IFCD Submissions details

Preselection | National Commissions Review

IFCD Preselection form - - 07/22/2019 - 12:54

Submitted by on 22 Jul 2019

1. Name and contact details of officer from the National Commission for UNESCO

Title:

Family name:

Irem

Given name:

Alpaslan

Position:

Expert

Address:

Gaziosmanpaşa Mahallesi, Reşit Galip Cd. Gökçek Sokak No:11, 06700 Çankaya/Ankara

Postcode:

06700

Town:

Ankara

E-mail:

iremalpaslantnc@gmail.com

2. Justification of pre-selection

What are the main reasons for having pre-selected this project proposal, as compared to other proposals received by the National Commission for UNESCO?:

Istanbul Foundation for Arts and Culture’s (IKSV) project entitled “Empowering Turkey Local Cultural Professionals” is pre-selected. The main reasons for the pre-selection of this project proposal compared to other proposals are as follows: - The project contributes to the IFCD’s Overall Goal, and complies with the statements under Unit 2 of the Pre Selection Guide (pages 8 to 12). Therefore this project application is eligible for the IFCD. The Project is found to be; - in line with the IFCD Programme objective 'the reinforcement of human and institutional capacities of the public sector and civil society organizations', -in line with the main outcomes of the IFCD Programme which is to strengthen civil participation and role of civil society in decision-making processes, -supporting the ER1.1, 1.2, 1,3 - The aims, objectives and expected results of the project may support Turkey’s cultural policies as well as the capacity building of civil society for their participation in the planning of the policies for cultural and creative industries

3. The applicant institution/organization

What elements demonstrate that the applicant institution/organization is a significant stakeholder in the culture sector (locally / nationally / internationally)?:

Istanbul Foundation for Culture and Arts (İKSV) is a non-profit cultural institution. Since 1973, the Foundation continues its efforts to enrich Istanbul’s cultural and artistic life. IKSV regularly organises the Istanbul Festivals of Music, Film, Theatre and Jazz, the Istanbul Biennial, the Istanbul Design Biennial, Leyla Gencer Voice Competition, autumn film week Filmekimi and realises one-off events throughout the year. The Foundation hosts cultural and artistic events from various disciplines at its performance venue. The work of IKSV for long has also included projects and activities related to cultural policy, urban development, cultural planning as well as capacity building.

4. Relevance of the pre-selected project proposal

4.1. What are the main current needs and priorities in your country in terms of cultural policies and/or cultural industries?:

Main priorities of Turkey in terms of cultural policies can be summarized as; * The impact of the creative and cultural industries on national income, exports and contribution to the promotion of the country will be increased. *The role of local administrations, private and civil initiatives will be strengthened within the scope of development and promotion of policy making processes and cultural industries. *Capacity building of cultural entrepreneurs and new business models will be developed. *Integrate the development of cultural industries to sustainable development of Turkey and establishment of sustainable governance of culture end creative sectors. *Promote women to involve in the creative sectors as representatives, entrepreneurs and participators.

4.2. How do the objectives of this pre-selected project proposal meet the current needs and priorities of the country in terms of cultural policies and/or cultural industries?:

The Panel noted the following points of the application to be in line with the above-mentioned priorities. - In order to design the training programs that will be delivered to culture professionals within the project, a need assessment research is planning to be conducted. This activity can be a first step to help the identification of the current situation of civil society participation to cultural policy decision making processes. - The digital platform which will be prepared within the project can facilitate and sustain the networks and knowledge that will be formed during the trainings.The digital platform can function as an online capacity empowerment tool that include discussion forum, audio-visual content, publications) and increase the accessibility of resources for project’s beneficiaries - The training programs may help enhancing skills and capacities of cultural professionals working at local public authorities, civil society and private initiatives.

4.3. To what extent do you expect this pre-selected project proposal to have an impact on the country’s cultural policies and/or cultural industries?:

This pre-selected project is expected to have an impact on 'the reinforcement of human and institutional capacities of the public sector and civil society organizations' and strengthen civil participation and role of civil society in decision-making processes.

6. The pre-selection process at the national level

M. Öcal OĞUZ

Full name:

M. Öcal OĞUZ

Organization:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University Faculty of Letters; Diversity of Cultural Expressions Committee of the Turkish National Commission for UNESCO

Type of organization/Institution:

INGO

Position:

Prof. Dr. ; President

Nilüfer TIMISI NALÇAOĞLU

Full name:

Nilüfer TIMISI NALÇAOĞLU

Organization:

Istanbul University Faculty of Communication Department of Radio, TV and Cinema; the Diversity of Cultural Expressions Committee of the Turkish National Commission for UNESCO

Type of organization/Institution:

INGO

Position:

Prof. Dr., Vice President

Ayşegül GÖKÇEN KARAARSLAN

Full name:

Ayşegül GÖKÇEN KARAARSLAN

Organization:

Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Diversity of Cultural Expressions Committee of the Turkish National Commission for UNESCO

Type of organization/Institution:

Parte

Position:

Deputy Director General for Cultural Affairs, Member

Belgin ASLAN

Full name:

Belgin ASLAN

Organization:

Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Diversity of Cultural Expressions Committee of the Turkish National Commission for UNESCO

Type of organization/Institution:

Parte

Position:

Focal Point for the 2005 Convention, Member

Feride Merve NİMETOĞLU

Full name:

Feride Merve NİMETOĞLU

Organization:

MUYORBİR, Diversity of Cultural Expressions Committee of the Turkish National Commission for UNESCO

Type of organization/Institution:

NGO

Position:

Secretary General, Member

Tuba Işınsu DURMUŞ

Full name:

Tuba Işınsu DURMUŞ

Organization:

TOBB ETÜ University Faculty of Literature, Diversity of Cultural Expressions Committee of the Turkish National Commission for UNESCO

Type of organization/Institution:

INGO

Position:

Assoc Prof Dr. , Member

Irem ALPASLAN BASIK

Full name:

Irem ALPASLAN BASIK

Organization:

Diversity of Cultural Expressions Committee of the Turkish National Commission for UNESCO

Type of organization/Institution:

INGO

Position:

Rapporteur and Expert

Date:

2019

Full Name of the representative of the National Commission as Signature:

Irem Alpaslan

IFCD Submissions details

Eligibility | Technical Assessment

IFCD Eligibility form - j_casas - 10/09/2019 - 11:53

Submitted by j_casas on 09 Oct 2019

Eligibility Status:

Eligible

Technical Examination

Submitted by the deadline:

Yes

Application Form submitted either in English or French:

Yes

Maximum amount requested is US$ 100,000 or below:

Yes

Project implementation period is between 12 and 24 months:

Yes

All sections of the Form are completed:

Yes

Signature of applicant:

Yes

The applicant does not have an ongoing IFCD funded project:

Yes

Falls within the areas of intervention of IFCD:

Yes

IF PARTY OR NGO

Party to the 2005 Convention from developing countries:

Yes

National Commission Review Form:

Yes

Signature of National Commission:

Yes

Official document/ statutes (with English or French translation if necessary):

Yes

IFCD Submissions details

Experts Evaluations

EVALUATION GRID
8 points	The project proposal addresses perfectly all relevant aspect of the criterion under consideration. The answer provides all the information needed and there are no concerns or areas of weakness
6-7 points	The proposal addressed the criterion well, although some improvements could be made. The answer gives clear information on all or nearly all of the evidence needed.
5-4 points	The project proposal broadly addresses the criterion, but there are still some weaknesses. The answer gives some relevant information, but there are several areas where detail is lacking or the information is unclear.
3-2 points	The project proposal does not entirely address the criterion or cannot be judged properly due to missing or incomplete information. The answer does not necessarily address the question asked, or gives very little relevant information.
1 point	The project proposal barely addresses the criterion. There is a clear lack of relevant information that makes it extremely difficult to judge whether the question asked is addressed.
0 points	The project proposal fails to address the criterion or cannot be assessed due to the lack of pertinent information. The answer does not address the question asked, or does not provide relevant information.

Expert 1

Sub-Total Expert 1 : 16.5

IFCD Expert Evaluation form - f_farhat - 10/16/2019 - 23:26

Submitted by f_farhat on 16 Oct 2019

Brief summary of the project:

IKSV proposes a project titled “Empowering Turkey’s Local Cultural Professionals”. The project aims to improve the capacity of cultural professionals at the local level in cultural policies and management and to foster civil participation in the decision making the process through enhancing dialogue by all stakeholders. The project focuses on small cities and also gives special attention to women. I like this project and I have gotten to know and appreciate IKSV’s work only two years ago.

1. RELEVANCE AND APPROPRIATENESS OF THE PROJECT TO THE OBJECTIVES AND AREAS OF INTERVENTION OF THE IFCD

1.1 Please describe how the project objectives and proposed impact/long-term benefits are aligned with at least one of the IFCD’s outcomes and associated expected results.:

The project is inspired by the 2005 convention. The project addresses outcomes 1 and 3 and 4 as well. It is quite comprehensive. More specifically it addresses ER 1.1, 1.2, 1.3. ER 3.2 and 3.3 and ER 4.1. The justification proposed by the applicant is valid and clear.

1.2 How do the objectives of this project proposal meet the current needs and priorities of the country/ region in terms of cultural policies and/or cultural industries?:

Under the present political ambiance in Turkey, the applicant recognizes the need to enhance the potential l role that culture can play as a « mediator of democracy « in the country. The applicant sees the need for engaging in a participatory process on cultural policies and putting the decentralization of cultural policy in practice. The project is also seen as a step to activate Turkey’s participation in the Council of Europe’s National Cultural Policy review project.

1.3 To what extent are the project’s objectives specific and measurable?:

The project's two main objectives are clear, well, written, concise and measurable.

1.4 To what extent does the project contribute to the promotion of gender equality, the empowerment of youth, South-South and North-South-South cooperation and/or the participation of various groups in the areas of intervention of the IFCD?:

To a very large extent. The project’s focus on capacity building invites young people and women to the process. The project also collaborates with multiple national and European entities.

Score:

2. FEASIBILITY OF THE PROJECT, AS WELL AS THE RELEVANCE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF ITS MODALITIES OF EXECUTION

2.1 What elements demonstrate the applicant’s organizational capacity (main activities of the institution/organization) and competence (skills and background of staff) to implement the work plan and manage the budget?:

IKSV is an extremely strong partner. It’s has been working on cultural policy and empowerment for a while now. The foundation has strong human and financial resources. The project staff allocated to the project seems qualified to conduct the proposed project. The experience of outside expertise will be solicited.

2.2 To what extent do the activities address relevant issues? Please explain how the methodology is appropriate to achieving the objectives?:

To a very large extent. There is a lot of discussions now in Turkey on cultural policies, their role, and models. The project adopts a comprehensive methodology that includes assessment, research, capacity building and platforms of exchange.

2.3 To what extent is the time frame realistic and coherent with the activities?:

The project is to be implemented in a two year period. This is enough time for reflection and implementation of the different phases. IKSV is also investing in its previous knowledge and partnerships.

2.4 Have the direct and indirect beneficiaries of the project been clearly identified? To what extent are the outputs/deliverables and main activities relevant to the target beneficiaries and address their needs?:

Yes, they have been clearly identified; I believe that the outputs and activities are relevant to them. The particularity of focusing on marginalized areas outside Istanbul and in Anatolia is very clear and precise.

Score:

3. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY

3.1 Does the budget provide for adequate resources (salaries, fees, equipment, travel, communication, etc.) necessary for success of the project? If the budget has been overestimated or underestimated, please explain how.:

Yes, it does. The total budget of the project is $100, 000. The amount requested for salaries is pretty high knowing that the foundation already has a big and well-trained staff. The amount allocated to travel is justified as the project projects to many different geographic areas.

3.2 What proportion of the budget is allocated to project activities versus overhead costs? Does the budget seem adequate and overhead costs estimated in compliance with the limit to a maximum of 30% of the total project budget?:

Only 6 % of the budget is allocated to overheads, which is reasonable and acceptable.

3.3 Does the project proposal indicate any additional financial contributions to the project, such as co-funding and/or self- funding?:

No. The amount requested constitutes the entire budget of the project. Partner organizations will also contribute in expertize.

3.4 What actions have been foreseen to ensure financial accountability (e.g. Involvement of a financial officer)?:

The foundation’s financial department is well resourced in terms of staff and also past experience. The organization has a clear financial and administrative procedure. This should not be a problem at all.

Score :

4. IMPACT AND EXPECTED RESULTS, INCLUDING POTENTIAL FOR STRUCTURAL CHANGE

4.1 Are the project’s expected outputs and/or deliverables concrete, measurable and realistic? To what extent are they likely to achieve the objectives of the project?:

Yes, the project’s expected outputs and deliverables are concrete, measurable and realistic. They are highly likely to achieve the objectives of the project. Please also keep in mind the status that the Foundation enjoys and its past experience.

4.2 To what extent are the main activities and the budget relevant and appropriate to achieving the intended outputs and/or deliverables?:

To a very large extent. The main activities of the project are well thought off and are reflected well in the proposed budget. With proper monitoring, the project is likely to achieve the intended outputs.

4.3 To what extent is it expected that this project will have an impact/long-term benefits on the country/region’s cultural policies and/or cultural industries?:

The project is focused and its activities are geared toward ensuring long term impact through; increased capacity, cultural diversity in planning and local governments’ agendas; building partnerships and networks for peer support and advocacy; and locally informed project development. (as stated in the applications).

4.4 To what extent does the project demonstrate potential for structural change (for example: changes in the policy environment; far-reaching changes in public and professional organizational structures; and changes in the way government and regulatory authorities do business)?:

The project has a very high chance of influencing the country’s national and local cultural policies. It will act as a mediator between the independent cultural scène and different governmental entities aiming towards policy change. This is clear.

Score:

5. SUSTAINABILITY

5.1 To what extent are contractors and partners involved in the implementation of the project’s activities? Has the role of each contractor and/or partner been clearly described?:

The project proposes an extensive list of partners that range from a local governmental to national to also European. The roles and responsibilities of the different partners are nicely and precisely outlined.

5.2 How does the project relate to and/or complement the work that is already being carried out in the country/region in terms of cultural policies and/or industries?:

IKSV has in the past undertaken several cultural policy projects including research. The project comes to add to this experience. In addition, the project is in alignment with the central government reform initiatives.

5.3 What measures/steps are proposed to ensure that the project’s impact/long-term benefits can be achieved?:

The training of the professionals will lead to increased institutional and personal capacities and enhanced participation in policy-related matters, this is the most significant guarantee of long term impact. Culture will inevitably be invited to the center of the discussion on decentralization. The participatory nature of the project can lead to better advocacy and we set new traditions at work. More attention will be paid to inclusive policies, intercultural dialogue, access to culture and social inclusion.

5.4 What measures/steps are proposed to follow up with the beneficiaries of the project after its completion?:

The main tool for follow-up will be the digital platform. During the training, the trainers will be subjected to pre and post-tests. The results will be included in the design of the next phase. Communications with partner organizations and other stakeholders will be maintained. The participation of the project will be included in the design of new relevant activities.

Score:

Overall evaluation:

I am a strong advocate for this project. It is well thought of and designed and is likely to be implemented with great efficiency. It is also needed and is in the heart of the 2005 Convention. IKVS has the capacity to run it and run it well.

Expert 2

Sub-Total Expert 2 : 16.5

IFCD Expert Evaluation form - s_gardner - 10/26/2019 - 09:28

Submitted by s_gardner on 26 Oct 2019

Brief summary of the project:

The project, ‘Empowering Turkey’s Local Cultural Professionals’, aims to improve the capacity of cultural professionals in the field of cultural policies and cultural management; and fostering civil participation in decision-making by enhancing dialogue and cooperation between the civil and public sectors in relation to culture and cultural professionals. The project will focus on small to medium scale cities in Turkey (Anatolia) as these are not well-served in the way that Istanbul is. Gender equity would be a priority.

1. RELEVANCE AND APPROPRIATENESS OF THE PROJECT TO THE OBJECTIVES AND AREAS OF INTERVENTION OF THE IFCD

1.1 Please describe how the project objectives and proposed impact/long-term benefits are aligned with at least one of the IFCD’s outcomes and associated expected results.:

The application appropriately describes in detail how the project would address ER 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3; ER 3.2 and 3.3; and ER 4.1

1.2 How do the objectives of this project proposal meet the current needs and priorities of the country/ region in terms of cultural policies and/or cultural industries?:

The role of culture in being a mediator of democracy is emerging in Turkey, and there is increasing focus on decentralization and civil participation but few resources to effect these changes. This project would help gather information and engender the discussions necessary for good cultural policy making in each distinct region. Turkey joined the CoE’s National Cultural Policy Review in 2007 but the report has had little effect in Anatolia.

1.3 To what extent are the project’s objectives specific and measurable?:

The objectives are fairly clear, specific and measurable.

To a reasonable extent. Women will be prioritized in the selection process for the training programs and participation in other aspects of the management and implementation of the project.

Score:

2. FEASIBILITY OF THE PROJECT, AS WELL AS THE RELEVANCE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF ITS MODALITIES OF EXECUTION

The applicant, Istanbul Foundation for Culture and the Arts (IKSV), has been established over 45 years as an NGO to present festivals and promote Turkey’s cultural assets and support artistic and cultural production, and contribute to the development of cultural policies. The project staff allocated to the project seem well qualified to conduct the proposed project. Some positions will require consultants to be hired so they are unknown.

2.2 To what extent do the activities address relevant issues? Please explain how the methodology is appropriate to achieving the objectives?:

To a significant extent. The project covers research, training, web platform for promotion and sharing of materials, and preparation of a shadow report on cultural policies.

2.3 To what extent is the time frame realistic and coherent with the activities?:

The project runs for 2 years from April 2020. There is ample time allowed for the various stages. There is little detail of the plans and timetable for the training workshops which would be developed following the research and consultation.

Yes the beneficiaries have been clearly identified and the outputs are relevant to them to a great extent.

Score:

3. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY

The budget is $100k which forms the entire grant request. Of this $42k is for salaries and $32k for travel etc. Due to the decentralized nature of the project, especially the training aspects, the travel costs seem appropriate. The costs are provided in reasonable but not great detail and seem appropriate.

About $6k is allowed for overheads which is reasonable. Other costs of about $20k, half of which is for the digital platform, seem reasonable.

3.3 Does the project proposal indicate any additional financial contributions to the project, such as co-funding and/or self- funding?:

No. However, the application notes that some costs will be met by the partner organisations (such as promotion etc) and are not included in the budget.

3.4 What actions have been foreseen to ensure financial accountability (e.g. Involvement of a financial officer)?:

IKSV has an entire department of 8 people dedicated to financial management and accounting and there is an annual audit conducted. The Partner, TAV, is also experienced in management and the staff from both organisations will be experienced in management.

Score :

4. IMPACT AND EXPECTED RESULTS, INCLUDING POTENTIAL FOR STRUCTURAL CHANGE

4.1 Are the project’s expected outputs and/or deliverables concrete, measurable and realistic? To what extent are they likely to achieve the objectives of the project?:

The outputs are concrete, measurable and realistic and entirely appropriate to the project.

4.2 To what extent are the main activities and the budget relevant and appropriate to achieving the intended outputs and/or deliverables?:

The activities and budget are relevant to achieving the outputs.

4.3 To what extent is it expected that this project will have an impact/long-term benefits on the country/region’s cultural policies and/or cultural industries?:

The project is well focused on achieving long-term benefits and these are listed in the application including: increased capacity; cultural diversity in planning and local govt agendas; building partnerships and networks for peer support and advocacy; and locally informed project development.

Given the experience on the project team and the needs of the sector, it appears very likely that the project can bring about changes in the policy environment and far-reaching changes in organizational structures for the culture sector. The feasibility of the Ministry of Culture being able to respond with policies and budgets will of course be another question.

Score:

5. SUSTAINABILITY

5.1 To what extent are contractors and partners involved in the implementation of the project’s activities? Has the role of each contractor and/or partner been clearly described?:

The main project partner will be Turkey Europe Foundation (TAV) and the applicants plan to build relationships with local and national government agencies (incl Ministry of Culture). Their roles are described in detail and seem appropriate.

5.2 How does the project relate to and/or complement the work that is already being carried out in the country/region in terms of cultural policies and/or industries?:

The project is in line with EU and central govt reform initiatives. The applicant, IKSV, has already undertaken previous cultural policy projects that would feed into this project; as has the partner organisation, so there are already good networks and knowledge in place.

5.3 What measures/steps are proposed to ensure that the project’s impact/long-term benefits can be achieved?:

Training of cultural professionals will mean they are better empowered to take action at the local level in the future. Both partners are well known and will continue to work in the field and update their programs accordingly, especially if funding is found; the web platform will continue to operate; reports will be circulated to stakeholders to extend their impact.

5.4 What measures/steps are proposed to follow up with the beneficiaries of the project after its completion?:

The digital platform will be the main tool for follow up; the impacts will be evaluated during and after the project; there will be communication and promotion of the project and its outcomes to encourage ongoing engagement; the partners will involve beneficiaries in their future projects.

Score:

Overall evaluation:

The overall conception of this project is well-considered and informed, and the planning is thorough. Given the needs of the cultural sector in Turkey and the objectives and outcomes proposed, the project seems very appropriate and relevant to the aims of the IFCD.

IFCD Submissions details

Recommandation review

IFCD Recommendation form - - 01/08/2020 - 10:56

Submitted by on 08 Jan 2020

Recommendation Status:

Recommended

Recommended Funding:

92000.00

Evaluation summary:

This project, proposed by the Istanbul Foundation for Culture and Arts (İKSV), is designed for the capacity building of cultural professionals from both public and civil society sectors in Anatolia. The proposal includes a needs assessment, a training program, a digital platform and a report on the current situation of the region’s cultural actors. Gender equity is highlighted with a commitment to select at least 50% women among the trainees. The project adopts a comprehensive methodology that includes a survey, research, capacity building and exchange platforms. The applicant is a well-established and experienced cultural NGO and the staff allocated to the project are qualified. The outputs are concrete, measurable and appropriate to the project, and the activities and budget are relevant to achieving the outputs. The budget is well adapted to the project but the salaries are somewhat overestimated and should be reduced by $8000. The digital platform will be the main tool for following up, the program’s impact will be evaluated during and after the project, and there will be relevant communication and promotion of the project and its outcomes to encourage ongoing engagement. In accordance with Decision 12.IGC 6, paragraph 7, one (1) bonus point has been attributed to this project as it will be implemented in a country that has never benefited from IFCD funding.