State of Conservation
130
Reports
43
Properties
31
States Parties
Table View
List view
Statistics
Map
Excel file
All SOC (Zip file)Threats* :
| States Parties: |
 Mauritius
|
| Year: | 2019 |
| Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Commercial development |
| States Parties: |
 India
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
| Threats*: | Commercial development |
| Other Threats: | Worrying state of conservation of Agra Fort |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 2003 |
| Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
| Threats*: | Commercial development |
| States Parties: |
 Tunisia
|
| Year: | 1992 |
| Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/2,WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
| Threats*: | Commercial development |
| States Parties: |
 Guatemala
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
| Threats*: | Commercial development |
| States Parties: |
Guatemala
|
| Year: | 2003 |
| Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Commercial development |
| States Parties: |
Guatemala
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Commercial development |
| States Parties: |
 Poland
|
| Year: | 1997 |
| Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
| Threats*: | Commercial development |
| States Parties: |
Poland
|
| Year: | 1996 |
| Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
| Threats*: | Commercial development |
| States Parties: |
Poland
|
| Year: | 1993 |
| Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
| Threats*: | Commercial development |
| Other Threats: | Threat to the integrity of the property (not specified - supermarket project?) |
| States Parties: |
 Oman
|
| Year: | 2008 |
| Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Commercial development |
| Other Threats: | Deterioration of the earthen structures of the Fort; |
| States Parties: |
Oman
|
| Year: | 2007 |
| Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Commercial development |
| Other Threats: | Deterioration of the earthen structures of the Fort |
| States Parties: |
Oman
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Commercial development |
| Other Threats: | Deterioration of the earthen structures of the Fort |
| States Parties: |
Oman
|
| Year: | 2005 |
| Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
| Threats*: | Commercial development |
| Other Threats: | Deterioration of the earthen structure of the Fort |
| States Parties: |
Oman
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
| Threats*: | Commercial development |
| States Parties: |
Oman
|
| Year: | 2003 |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
| Threats*: | Commercial development |
| States Parties: |
Oman
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
| Threats*: | Commercial development |
| States Parties: |
 Belgium France
|
| Year: | 2008 |
| Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Commercial development |
| States Parties: |
Belgium France
|
| Year: | 2007 |
| Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Commercial development |
| States Parties: |
 Indonesia
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Commercial development |
| Other Threats: | Uncontrolled vendors around the property |
Properties
Categories
Regions
States Parties
Afghanistan Australia Belgium Bulgaria Chile China Colombia France Germany Guatemala India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Jordan Lebanon Malta Mauritius Mexico Morocco Nepal Oman Peru Poland Russian Federation Sri Lanka Tunisia Turkey United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America UruguayThreats
Commercial development (130)
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
