<
 
 
 
 
×
>
You are viewing an archived web page, collected at the request of United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) using Archive-It. This page was captured on 13:37:34 Jan 03, 2022, and is part of the UNESCO collection. The information on this web page may be out of date. See All versions of this archived page.
Loading media information hide

Quadrennial Periodic Report
Alemania 2020

Quadrennial Periodic Report - - 10/21/2020 - 16:12

General Information

Technical Information

Name of Party: 
Alemania
Date of Ratification: 
2007
Officially Designated Point of Contact of the Convention: 

QPR Stakeholder

Title: 
Ms.
Address: 
Christine M. Merkel
German Commission for UNESCO
Martin-Luther-Allee 42
53175 Bonn
Germany
Phone Number: 
+49 228 60497 110
Email: 
2005konvention@unesco.de
Describe the multi-stakeholder consultation process established for the preparation of this report, including consultations with relevant ministries, public institutions, local governments and civil society organizations.: 

On 24 June 2019, the steering committee (see above) met at the Federal Foreign Office. On the basis of the resolutions by the Conference of Parties, it set the timetable for the consultation procedure and the specific priorities for the Periodic Report.

From July to October 2019, the national point of contact called upon all civil society actors (see below) to communicate relevant initiatives and measures for the Third Quadrennial Periodic Report. During the same time period, the AA, BKM, Kultur-MK and the Länder with their respective departments participated by submitting relevant measures for the report. Additionally, the AA invited all relevant ministries, the Federal Statistical Office and the Association of German Cities to name relevant measures.

Back in summer of 2018, at the suggestion of civil society actors, the national point of contact had also invited all stakeholders to participate in an online consultation as part of monitoring the implementation of the 2005 UNESCO Convention. Additionally, the national point of contact proactively conducted in-depth research and analyses in 2018 and 2019. Altogether, over 100 relevant measures and initiatives were thus identified by 1 October 2019.

On 30 October 2019, the Sub-Committee for Culture and the Advisory Committee on the “Diversity of Cultural Expressions” of the German Commission for UNESCO addressed the requirements of the Third Quadrennial Periodic Report and the central developments and challenges during the reporting period. In keeping with the reporting structure newly agreed in 2019, 100 contributions were compiled into a first draft by 23 December 2019.

This first draft report served as the basis for three combined consultation processes:
a) The steering committee arranged for an initial quality check and solicited feedback from all relevant federal ministries and the Länder.
b) Actors and committees from both civil society and the expert community were invited to comment online on this draft report from 23 December 2019 to 19 January 2020.
c) At a special session of the Federal Coalition for Cultural Diversity held in Cologne on 21 January 2020, the draft report and all online comments were peer-reviewed chapter by chapter; keywords on core progress areas and challenges during the 2016 to 2019 reporting period from the perspective of civil society actors were identified; primary outcomes, key developments, challenges, problem-solving strategies and next steps were compiled and put forward for discussion.
Some 70 comments and the findings of the consultation on 21 January 2020 were taken into account when preparing the second draft of the report in the version dated 27 January 2020. The steering committee then reviewed this version and, from 27 to 31 January 2020, arranged for feedback from all relevant federal ministries as well as from the Länder and the Association of German Cities.

The steering committee also took into account the findings of the consultations and the remarks and proposals from civil society at its final reading of the report text, which took place on 4 February 2020 under the lead responsibility of the AA, before the Federal Cabinet took note of and approved it on 12 August 2020. On this basis, it was submitted to UNESCO in November 2020.

Executive summary: 

The protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions are the basis of the cultural policy of the Federal Government, the Länder and the local authorities in Germany. They promote a culture of participation of civil society actors at all levels. According to the 2018 Report on Cultural Funding (Kulturfinanzbericht), public spending for the protection and promotion of culture and the arts amounts to 0.34% of gross domestic product. Co productions on an equal footing and the dismantling of inequalities are important goals for international cultural cooperation.

This report presents 100 sample measures that strengthen sustainable systems of governance for culture. In this context, the strong trend of Länder and municipalities compiling longer-term cultural guidelines and cultural development concepts continues. In these efforts, they are actively responding to demographic, digital and ecological transformations. The innovative capacities of cultural infrastructures and institutions are becoming even more important. Cultural diversity is now the rule, not the exception. Artistic projects and cultural education are contributing to dialogue in society. During the reporting period, many refugees arrived in Germany from crisis and war zones. Some of the measures reported on here were in response to this development.

The plurality of media systems continues to guarantee freedom of opinion and a diversity of contents. It provides all citizens with various entry points to the media while ensuring that the populace has a presence in the media. A “media diversity monitor” has now been actively deployed across Germany.

Multi-year transformation programmes for museums, archives and libraries designed to expand their digital competencies are responding to the digital environment’s challenges and disruptions. The promotion of digital creativity as a tool of democratic popular culture and media culture must be institutionalised at some point in the future.

Model projects that stabilize and strengthen the efficacy of socio-cultural work play an important role in boosting the competencies and capacities of civil society entities.

Cultural content and forms of expression from countries in the Global South have continued to gain visibility thanks to international cooperation, co-productions, mobility, preferential treatment and artist residencies. Cooperation with cultural actors in Africa was further increased, partly in response to the debate, ongoing since 2017, on questions related to German colonial history and the handling of collections from colonial contexts. The successful programmes for publishers and for emerging cinematic talent have been further deepened and expanded. In 2019, they actively participated in the new medium-term cooperation initiative “Fair Culture” on the concept of preferential treatment in the artistic and cultural sector.

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development shapes the role of culture in strategies for sustainable development. The German Sustainable Development Strategy, initially adopted in 2017 and revised in 2018, was the first to use the concept of a “culture of sustainability” as a guiding principle, whereby public programming funds for transformative cultural projects were made available. Important sectors of the creative industry, such as film and television, are developing prototypes for ecologically sound production methods.

In the framework of international and development cooperation, one focus is the structural contribution of the artistic and cultural sector towards the attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly in countries of Africa and the Near East. The Federal Government promotes the economic strength and innovative capacities of this promising sector, which creates jobs and prospects for young entrepreneurs in particular, and opens up new fields of business.

Promoting human rights and fundamental freedoms is a requirement for implementing this UNESCO cultural convention.
Due to gender disparities, society misses out on quality, quantity and diversity of cultural content and forms of expression. Available talent is left untapped. Mentoring programmes to promote women, as well as other initiatives, were significantly expanded, the risk of violence was reduced and, overall, gender equality was embedded transversally in many different projects. This is also a focus of Germany’s Presidency of the Council of the European Union in the second half of 2020.

By taking new measures, such as the Martin Roth Initiative, to protect artists and cultural professionals under threat, by intensifying its cooperation in the International Cities of Refuge Network, and by releasing general statements in response to developments, Germany has acknowledged in political terms and reinforced in practical terms the importance of protecting artistic freedom. Illiberal democracies and political systems that are increasingly re-nationalising present a challenge to artistic freedom and international cooperation.

In 2019, Germany submitted to UNESCO a 40-page implementation report on the key aspect of the social and economic status of artists and cultural professionals in the digital environment. That implementation report is included as an annex to this Periodic Report.

Contact details of the stakeholders involved in the preparation of the quadrennial periodic report (QPR). Please also include the contact details of the civil society organizations (CSOs) if they have contributed to the QPR drafting, including through the CSO form.: 
Organization typeOrganizationWebsite
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Adolf-Grimme-Institut – Research institution on media culture
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Akademie der Künste der Welt gGmbH – Arts Academy
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
alba Kultur – International Office for Global Music
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung – Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Allianz Kulturstiftung – Allianz Cultural Foundation
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Arbeitskreis selbständiger Kultur-Institute e.V. – Association of Independent Cultural Institutes
Public Sector
ARD – Public media services
Public Sector
ZDF – Public media services
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Arnold-Bergstraesser-Institut für kulturwissenschaftliche Forschung – Arnold Bergstraesser Institute for socio-cultural research
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Berlinale, Talent Campus – Annual summit and networking platform of the Berlin International Film Festival
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Bertelsmann Stiftung – Bertelsmann Foundation
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Bundesverband Darstellendes Spiel – Federal Association of Performing Arts
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Bundesverband der Film- und Fernsehregisseure – Federal Association of Film and TV Directors
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Bundesverband der Theater und Orchester – Federal Association of Theatres and Orchestras
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Bundesverband kommunale Filmarbeit – German Association for Art House Cinemas
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Bundesvereinigung der kommunalen Spitzenverbände – Association of German Cities
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Bundesvereinigung Kulturelle Kinder- und Jugendbildung e.V. – Union of Federal Associations for Cultural Youth Education
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Büro für Kulturpolitik und Kulturwirtschaft – Office for Cultural Policies and Culture Industries
Private Sector
Büro für Kultur- und Medienprojekte GmbH – Office for Cultural and Media Projects, Culture Concepts
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Deutsche Filmakademie e.V. – The German Film Academy
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Deutsche Literaturkonferenz e.V. – German Literature Conference
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Deutsche Orchestervereinigung e.V. – Association of German Orchestras
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Deutscher Bundesverband Tanz e.V. – German Association of Dance
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Deutscher Designertag e.V. – German Designerforum
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Deutscher Kulturrat e.V. – German Cultural Council
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Deutscher Museumsbund – German Museum Association
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Deutscher Musikrat e.V. – German Music Council
Public Sector
Deutsches Historisches Museum – German Historical Museum
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Europäisches Institut für vergleichende Kulturforschung – European Institute for Comparative Cultural Research
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Genossenschaft Deutscher Bühnen-Angehöriger – Guild of the German Stage
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Goethe-Institut e.V. – Federal Republic of Germany’s cultural institute
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Hans-Bredow-Institut für Medienforschung – Hans Bredow Institute for Media Research
Haus der Kulturen der Welt – House of World Cultures
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Institut für Auslandsbeziehungen e.V. – ifa, institute for foreign relations
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Institut für Kunst, Kultur und Zukunftsfähigkeit – Institute for Art, Culture and Sustainability
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Internationale Gesellschaft der Bildenden Künste – International Society of Fine Arts
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Internationales Theaterinstitut – International Theatre Institute
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Kulturpolitische Gesellschaft e.V. – Society for Cultural Policy
Public Sector
Kulturstiftung der Länder – Cultural Foundation of the Länder
Public Sector
Kulturstiftung des Bundes – German Federal Cultural Foundation
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Spitzenorganisation der Filmwirtschaft e.V. – Umbrella organisation of the German film industry
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Stiftung Kunstfonds – Art Fund Foundation
Private Sector
Stiftung Mercator GmbH – Mercator Foundation
Public Sector
UNESCO-Lehrstuhl für internationale Beziehungen TU Dresden – UNESCO Chair in International Relations at the TU Dresden
Public Sector
UNESCO-Lehrstuhl für kulturelle Bildung Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg – UNESCO Chair in Arts and Culture in Education at FAU
Public Sector
UNESCO-Lehrstuhl Kulturpolitik für die Künste in Entwicklungsprozessen Universität Hildesheim – UNESCO Chair in Cultural Policy for the Arts in Development at the University of Hildesheim
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Verband Deutscher Drehbuchautoren e.V. – German Screenwriters’ Association
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Verband deutscher Musikschulen e.V. – Association of German Music Schools
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Verband Deutscher Schriftsteller – Association of German Writers
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Verband Privater Rundfunk und Telekommunikation e.V. – German Association of Commercial Radio and Telecommunication Providers
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Europäischer Musikrat – European Music Council
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
alba KULTUR – Büro für globale Musik – alba KULTUR – International Office for Global Music
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
STADTKULTUR Netzwerk Bayerischer Städte e.V. – STADTKULTUR network of Bavarian cities e.V.
Public Sector
Goethe-Institut e.V.
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Internationale Gesellschaft der Bildenden Künste (IGBK) – International Society of Fine Arts
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Akademie Schloss Solitude (artist-in-residence programme)
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Netzwerk Junge Ohren (young music network)
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Bundesverband Theater in Schulen – Federal Association Theatre in Schools
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Kulturpolitische Gesellschaft e.V. – Association for Cultural Policy
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Martin Roth-Initiative – Martin Roth Initiative (support for artists at risk)
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Bundesvereinigung Kulturelle Kinder- und Jugendbildung e.V. – Union of Federal Associations for Cultural Youth Education
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Deutscher Bühnenverein – German Theatre and Orchestra Association
Public Sector
Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission e.V. – German Commission for UNESCO
Public Sector
Auswärtiges Amt – Federal Foreign Office
Public Sector
Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg – Hamburg State and University Library
Public Sector
Kulturamt UNESCO Creative City Heidelberg – Cultural Office Heidelberg
Public Sector
Hochschule für Musik und Darstellende Kunst Mannheim – University of Music and Performing Arts Mannheim
Public Sector
Die Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Kultur und Medien – Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media
Public Sector
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
Public Sector
Sekretariat der Kultusministerkonferenz (KMK) – Secretariat of the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany

Goal 1 - Support Sustainable Systems of Governance for Culture

Cultural and Creative Sectors

A Ministry (or agency with ministerial status) is responsible for cultural and creative sectors: 
YES
Regional, provincial or local governments or administrations have decentralised responsibilities for policies and measures promoting the cultural and creative sectors:: 
YES
Regulatory frameworks and sector specific laws, policies and/or strategies supporting the cultural and creative industries have been revised or adopted during the last 4 years: 
YES
If YES, has at least one of them been designed through interministerial cooperation (involving different government departments responsible for policy areas, such as communication, education, ICT, trade, foreign affairs, labor, finance): 
YES
Specific education and training programmes in the arts and the cultural and creative sectors are established, including: 
Digital literacy programmes for creation and experimentation
Technical and vocational education and training programmes in
Cinema/Audiovisual arts
Cultural management
Design
Digital cultural and creative sectors
Media arts
Music
Performing arts
Publishing
Visual arts
Tertiary and university education degrees in
Cinema/audiovisual arts
Cultural management
Design
Digital cultural and creative sectors
Media arts
Music
Performing arts
Publishing
Visual arts
Specific measures and programmes have been implemented over the last 4 years to: 
Support job creation in the cultural and creative sectors
Encourage the formalization and growth of micro/small and medium-sized cultural enterprises
Statistical offices or research bodies have produced data during the last 4 years: 
related to cultural and creative sectors
evaluating cultural policies
Share of cultural and creative sectors in Gross Domestic Product (GDP): 
3.12%
2017
Please provide whenever possible disaggregated data by sector: 

Kind of industry

USD in 2017

1. Music

7.518.526.200

2. Book

6.007.547.100

3. Art

1.589.228.200

4. Film

8.879.619.700

5. Broadcasting

9.841.753.000

6. Performing Arts

8.696.671.100

7. Design

11.834.349.800

8. Architecture

7.769.805.000

9. Press

14.677.767.800

10. Advertising

13.149.155.100

11. Software/Games

34.176.121.000

12. Other

1.353.378.800

 

Source: Federal Ministry of Economics and Energy (BMWi), Monitoring Report Culture and Creative Industries 2018 

Share of employment in the cultural and creative sectors: 
4.70%
2018
Please provide whenever possible disaggregated data by sector, age, sex and type of employment: 

Sector/industry

15 – 25y

25 – 35y

35 - 45y

45 - 55y

55 - 65y

Over 65y

Manufacture of coins, jewellery and related articles

/

/

5.000

7.000

5.000

/

Retail sale of publishing products, sports equipment and toys

11.000

22.000

23.000

29.000

26.000

7.000

Publishing of books and magazines

31.000

33.000

35.000

50.000

49.000

19.000

Publishing Software

23.000

97.000

78.000

65.000

30.000

/

Motion picture and television programme production, distribution and sales; cinemas

9.000

17.000

17.000

12.000

7.000

/

Recording studios; production of radio programmes; publishing of recorded music and musical works

/

6.000

6.000

7.000

/

/

Radio broadcaster

/

/

5.000

6.000

/

/

Television broadcaster

/

6.000

/

5.000

/

/

Data processing, web portals, hosting and related activities

/

9.000

8.000

6.000

/

/

Other information service activities

/

11.000

11.000

11.000

9.000

/

Architecture and engineering offices

33.000

110.000

108.000

130.000

103.000

29.000

Advertising/advertising agencies

17.000

39.000

37.000

30.000

18.000

/

Studios for textile, jewellery, graphic and similar design

/

20.000

24.000

20.000

12.000

/

Photography and photo labs

/

9.000

11.000

9.000

9.000

/

Translating and interpreting

/

/

9.000

8.000

7.000

/

Creative, artistic and entertainment activities

14.000

43.000

47.000

57.000

41.000

20.000

Libraries, archives, museums, botanical and zoological gardens

/

11.000

11.000

13.000

18.000

/

Total

167.000

446.000

442.000

466.000

354.000

103.000

 

/ = no data, because numerical value not secure enough

 

 

Sector/industry

total

Male

Share

female

Share

Manufacture of coins, jewellery and related articles

23.000

11.000

46 %

12.000

54 %

Manufacture of musical instruments

10.000

7.000

70 %

3.000

30 %

Retail sale of publishing products, sports equipment and toys

119.000

45.000

38 %

74.000

62 %

Publishing of books and magazines

217.000

98.000

45 %

119.000

55 %

Publishing Software

296.000

223.000

75 %

73.000

25 %

Motion picture and television programme production, distribution and sales; cinemas

65.000

40.000

61 %

25.000

39 %

Recording studios; production of radio programmes; publishing of recorded music and musical works

27.000

16.000

60 %

11.000

40 %

Radio broadcaster

24.000

11.000

47 %

13.000

53 %

Television broadcaster

21.000

12.000

55 %

10.000

45 %

Data processing, web portals, hosting and related activities

32.000

21.000

67 %

10.000

33 %

Other information service activities

47.000

26.000

55 %

21.000

45 %

Architecture and engineering offices

513.000

336.000

65 %

177.000

35 %

Advertising/advertising agencies

145.000

75.000

52 %

70.000

48 %

Studios for textile, jewellery, graphic and similar design

84.000

41.000

49 %

43.000

51 %

Photography and photo labs

42.000

21.000

50 %

21.000

50 %

Translating and interpreting

33.000

11.000

33 %

22.000

67 %

Creative, artistic and entertainment activities

221.000

131.000

59 %

90.000

41 %

Libraries, archives, museums, botanical and zoological gardens

60.000

23.000

39 %

36.000

61 %

Total

1.978.000

1.147.000

58 %

830.000

42 %

 

 Source: Microcensus 2018, Federal Statistical Office, H204/32162100

Total public budget for culture (in USD): 
11,474,204,960USD
2018
Please provide whenever possible the share allocated by cultural sectors/domains (in %): 

Source on total public budget for culture in USD: Federal and State Statistical Offices, Cultural Finance Report 2018

1.73 percent of total public spending - Source: Statistical Offices of the Federal Government and the Länder - Kulturfinanzbericht 2018, p. 19.

Relevant Policies and Measures: 

Free Hanseatic City of Bremen: Report on Promotion of Culture (Kulturförderbericht), 2018

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Senator for Culture, Free Hanseatic City of Bremen
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Diseño
Medios de comunicación
Música
Las artes escénicas
Industria editorial
Artes visuales
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Developing longer-term governance guidelines and in some cases legislation to underpin robust cultural infrastructure that fosters the diversity of cultural expression with due consideration to demographic and digital change Target groups: Inhabitants of each Land; stakeholders funding, creating and/or interested in cultural content; volunteers; museum staff and sponsors (local and Land authorities, foundations, associations) Expected results: • Taking stock of varying situations in different fields of action • Setting out funding lines and instruments in a transparent manner • Laying foundations for sustainable cultural policy, cultural development and cultural promotion • Identifying and preserving the public’s cultural interests • Inspiring, expanding and consolidating collaborations and networks • Improving cultural sites and enriching the cultural scene • Strengthening diversity and participation • Intensifying the discourse on cultural policy • Establishing the objectives of cultural policy and measures well ahead of time, so that the relevant stakeholders can plan • Boosting cultural diversity nationwide • Generating a broad basis of data for informed decisions in cultural policy • Intensifying dialogue among museums, sponsors, the museums association and the relevant Land; expanding opportunities for cooperation and networks; promoting and strengthening the voluntary sector
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Report on Promotion of Culture presented in December 2018; Denkzellen forums set up for dialogue between Land authorities and the independent arts scene; supraregional jury of specialists appointed to allocate theatre project funding; procurement procedure made more transparent and binding
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania: Guidelines for Cultural Policy (Kulturpolitische Leitlinien), 2020

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Ministry of Education, Science and Culture; Land Council for Cultural Affairs; districts and municipalities of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Diseño
Medios de comunicación
Música
Las artes escénicas
Industria editorial
Artes visuales
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Developing longer-term governance guidelines and in some cases legislation to underpin robust cultural infrastructure that fosters the diversity of cultural expression with due consideration to demographic and digital change • Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania: The subject matter of the guidelines will cover, among other things, inclusion and participation, cultural events and facilities in urban and rural settings, and art and culture in the digital future. Target groups: Inhabitants of each Land; stakeholders funding, creating and/or interested in cultural content; volunteers; museum staff and sponsors (local and Land authorities, foundations, associations) Expected results: • Taking stock of varying situations in different fields of action • Setting out funding lines and instruments in a transparent manner • Laying foundations for sustainable cultural policy, cultural development and cultural promotion • Identifying and preserving the public’s cultural interests • Inspiring, expanding and consolidating collaborations and networks • Improving cultural sites and enriching the cultural scene • Strengthening diversity and participation • Intensifying the discourse on cultural policy • Establishing the objectives of cultural policy and measures well ahead of time, so that the relevant stakeholders can plan • Boosting cultural diversity nationwide • Generating a broad basis of data for informed decisions in cultural policy • Intensifying dialogue among museums, sponsors, the museums association and the relevant Land; expanding opportunities for cooperation and networks; promoting and strengthening the voluntary sector
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Public discussion process involving consultations, workshops and regional conferences launched in 2017, with a complete record made publicly available at https://www.kultur-mv.de/kultur-politik/leitlinien.html; interim report published in 2019 presenting the areas in which guidelines for cultural policy are being developed, available at https://www.regierung-mv.de/serviceassistent/_php/download.php?datei_id=1615820
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

North Rhine-Westphalia: Cultural Promotion Plan (Kulturförderplan), 2016–2018; North Rhine-Westphalia Land-Level Cultural Report (Landeskulturbericht Nordrhein-Westfalen), 2017

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Ministry of Cultural, Academic and Scientific Affairs, North Rhine-Westphalia
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Diseño
Medios de comunicación
Música
Las artes escénicas
Industria editorial
Artes visuales
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Developing longer-term governance guidelines and in some cases legislation to underpin robust cultural infrastructure that fosters the diversity of cultural expression with due consideration to demographic and digital change • North Rhine-Westphalia: The key objective is to foster diversity, i.e. to enable every person to participate in cultural life at any age, regardless of social situation, ethnic origin, health constraints or residency status. Target groups: Inhabitants of each Land; stakeholders funding, creating and/or interested in cultural content; volunteers; museum staff and sponsors (local and Land authorities, foundations, associations) Expected results: • Taking stock of varying situations in different fields of action • Setting out funding lines and instruments in a transparent manner • Laying foundations for sustainable cultural policy, cultural development and cultural promotion • Identifying and preserving the public’s cultural interests • Inspiring, expanding and consolidating collaborations and networks • Improving cultural sites and enriching the cultural scene • Strengthening diversity and participation • Intensifying the discourse on cultural policy • Establishing the objectives of cultural policy and measures well ahead of time, so that the relevant stakeholders can plan • Boosting cultural diversity nationwide • Generating a broad basis of data for informed decisions in cultural policy • Intensifying dialogue among museums, sponsors, the museums association and the relevant Land; expanding opportunities for cooperation and networks; promoting and strengthening the voluntary sector
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
North Rhine-Westphalia’s Culture Promotion Act (Kulturfördergesetz) provides for new structures and instruments; two key instruments are the Cultural Promotion Plan and Report; first Cultural Promotion Plan drawn up for 2016 to 2018 in a participatory process in collaboration with the cultural scene and adopted by the North Rhine-Westphalian Land parliament on 15 December 2016; implementation of the Plan is flanked by the Cultural Report (Landeskulturbericht), which analyses general developments relating to cultural policy in North Rhine-Westphalia; in 2017, the Land government announced a 50% increase in the culture budget to €300 million by 2022.
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Free State of Saxony: Amendment of 11 April 2018 to Saxony’s Cultural Areas Act (Kulturraumgesetz)

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Land parliament and government of the Free State of Saxony
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Diseño
Medios de comunicación
Música
Las artes escénicas
Industria editorial
Artes visuales
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Developing longer-term governance guidelines and in some cases legislation to underpin robust cultural infrastructure that fosters the diversity of cultural expression with due consideration to demographic and digital change Target groups: Inhabitants of each Land; stakeholders funding, creating and/or interested in cultural content; volunteers; museum staff and sponsors (local and Land authorities, foundations, associations) Expected results: • Taking stock of varying situations in different fields of action • Setting out funding lines and instruments in a transparent manner • Laying foundations for sustainable cultural policy, cultural development and cultural promotion • Identifying and preserving the public’s cultural interests • Inspiring, expanding and consolidating collaborations and networks • Improving cultural sites and enriching the cultural scene • Strengthening diversity and participation • Intensifying the discourse on cultural policy • Establishing the objectives of cultural policy and measures well ahead of time, so that the relevant stakeholders can plan • Boosting cultural diversity nationwide • Generating a broad basis of data for informed decisions in cultural policy • Intensifying dialogue among museums, sponsors, the museums association and the relevant Land; expanding opportunities for cooperation and networks; promoting and strengthening the voluntary sector
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Evaluation conducted in 2015 and law found to have proven effective (available for download at https://www.kulturland.sachsen.de/download/Evaluation.pdf); Saxony’s Cultural Areas Act (Kulturraumgesetz) amended on 11 April 2018; annual budget for equalising the culture-funding burden between the Free State of Saxony and local government bodies in rural areas increased by €8 million to a total of €94.7 million
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Free State of Thuringia: 2025 Museum Outlook (Museumsperspektive 2025), adopted in 2018, 2019 recommendations

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Cultural Affairs Department of the Thuringian State Chancellery
Thuringia Museum Association (Museumsverband Thüringen e.V.)
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Diseño
Medios de comunicación
Música
Las artes escénicas
Industria editorial
Artes visuales
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Developing longer-term governance guidelines and in some cases legislation to underpin robust cultural infrastructure that fosters the diversity of cultural expression with due consideration to demographic and digital change • Thuringia: The aim is to strengthen museums in view of the challenges relating to participation in cultural life, integration and inclusion, digitalisation and demographic change and to position them as important cultural players. Target groups: Inhabitants of each Land; stakeholders funding, creating and/or interested in cultural content; volunteers; museum staff and sponsors (local and Land authorities, foundations, associations) Expected results: • Taking stock of varying situations in different fields of action • Setting out funding lines and instruments in a transparent manner • Laying foundations for sustainable cultural policy, cultural development and cultural promotion • Identifying and preserving the public’s cultural interests • Inspiring, expanding and consolidating collaborations and networks • Improving cultural sites and enriching the cultural scene • Strengthening diversity and participation • Intensifying the discourse on cultural policy • Establishing the objectives of cultural policy and measures well ahead of time, so that the relevant stakeholders can plan • Boosting cultural diversity nationwide • Generating a broad basis of data for informed decisions in cultural policy • Intensifying dialogue among museums, sponsors, the museums association and the relevant Land; expanding opportunities for cooperation and networks; promoting and strengthening the voluntary sector
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Dialogue process initiated with various possible ways to participate and regional conferences held; recommendations for action drawn up; museums association given financial and staffing boost to provide consultation for museums funded by local authorities
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

increase of EU2.3 million in institutional support for museums and the museums association of Thuringia (2018 to 2019)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Chemnitz: 2018–2030 Cultural Strategy (Kulturstrategie), as part of the city’s bid to become European Capital of Culture in 2025

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Department of Education, Youth, Social and Cultural Affairs, Sports and Health of Chemnitz
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Diseño
Medios de comunicación
Música
Las artes escénicas
Industria editorial
Artes visuales
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Developing longer-term governance guidelines to underpin robust cultural infrastructure that promotes diversity of cultural expression in cities with due consideration to demographic and digital change; implementing global Sustainable Development Goals at the local level Target groups: City society and administration; stakeholders funding, creating and/or interested in cultural content Expected results: • Safeguarding, strengthening and expanding diverse cultural content • Setting objectives and concrete measures of municipal cultural policy for the coming years and creating planning certainty for cultural actors • Signposting the inclusion of cultural policy in city-wide planning and urban development • Identifying and protecting the public’s cultural interests • Promoting the transcultural openness of city society • Establishing and transmitting cities’ image as cultural sites across Germany and internationally • Bringing the activities of city administrations into line with the vision of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Workshops, cultural ateliers, world cafés and interviews held; ideas and feedback gathered from city society in public presentations; alternative visual version created of the Cultural Strategy Making Space for Culture (Kulturstrategie „Kultur Raum geben“) as a result of an open competition, namely a fold-out poster intended to make the strategy more accessible to the public, available at https://www.chemnitz.de/chemnitz/media/kultur/kulturfoerderung/kulturstrategie-online-de.pdf
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Magdeburg: 2030 Cultural Strategy (Kulturstrategie), as part of the city’s bid to become European Capital of Culture in 2025

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Department of Cultural Affairs, Schools and Sports of Magdeburg
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Diseño
Medios de comunicación
Música
Las artes escénicas
Industria editorial
Artes visuales
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Developing longer-term governance guidelines to underpin robust cultural infrastructure that promotes diversity of cultural expression in cities with due consideration to demographic and digital change; implementing global Sustainable Development Goals at the local level Target groups: City society and administration; stakeholders funding, creating and/or interested in cultural content Expected results: • Safeguarding, strengthening and expanding diverse cultural content • Setting objectives and concrete measures of municipal cultural policy for the coming years and creating planning certainty for cultural actors • Signposting the inclusion of cultural policy in city-wide planning and urban development • Identifying and protecting the public’s cultural interests • Promoting the transcultural openness of city society • Establishing and transmitting cities’ image as cultural sites across Germany and internationally • Bringing the activities of city administrations into line with the vision of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Public workshops and cultural discussions held as part of drafting process, with the workshops focusing on integration and migration in culture, digital transformation in cultural institutions and the strategic focuses of cultural promotion; website set up for online participation: http://www.kulturstrategie-md.de/forums/forum/diskussion/
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Nuremberg: 2018 Cultural Strategy (Kulturstrategie), as part of the city’s bid to become European Capital of Culture in 2025

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Cultural Affairs Division of the City of Nuremberg of Nuremberg
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Diseño
Medios de comunicación
Música
Las artes escénicas
Industria editorial
Artes visuales
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Developing longer-term governance guidelines to underpin robust cultural infrastructure that promotes diversity of cultural expression in cities with due consideration to demographic and digital change; implementing global Sustainable Development Goals at the local level Target groups: City society and administration; stakeholders funding, creating and/or interested in cultural content Expected results: • Safeguarding, strengthening and expanding diverse cultural content • Setting objectives and concrete measures of municipal cultural policy for the coming years and creating planning certainty for cultural actors • Signposting the inclusion of cultural policy in city-wide planning and urban development • Identifying and protecting the public’s cultural interests • Promoting the transcultural openness of city society • Establishing and transmitting cities’ image as cultural sites across Germany and internationally • Bringing the activities of city administrations into line with the vision of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Public consultation process conducted; city society kept abreast of news and events implementing the Cultural Strategy via https://www.nuernberg.de/internet/kulturreferat/werkstatt.html; activities carried out, e.g. (1) House of Games (Haus des Spiels) planned as a new cultural location and meeting place, (2) games-development project gameON2025 held, in which workshop groups of children and young people developed location-based digital games that can be downloaded for free
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Düsseldorf: 2015–2017 Cultural Development Planning (Kulturentwicklungsplanung)

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Cultural Affairs Office of Düsseldorf, capital of North Rhine-Westphalia
Society for Cultural Affairs (Kulturpolitische Gesellschaft e.V.)
Institute for Cultural Policy (Institut für Kulturpolitik)
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Diseño
Medios de comunicación
Música
Las artes escénicas
Industria editorial
Artes visuales
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Developing longer-term governance guidelines to underpin robust cultural infrastructure that promotes diversity of cultural expression in cities with due consideration to demographic and digital change; implementing global Sustainable Development Goals at the local level Target groups: City society and administration; stakeholders funding, creating and/or interested in cultural content Expected results: • Safeguarding, strengthening and expanding diverse cultural content • Setting objectives and concrete measures of municipal cultural policy for the coming years and creating planning certainty for cultural actors • Signposting the inclusion of cultural policy in city-wide planning and urban development • Identifying and protecting the public’s cultural interests • Promoting the transcultural openness of city society • Establishing and transmitting cities’ image as cultural sites across Germany and internationally • Bringing the activities of city administrations into line with the vision of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Coordination office for implementing Cultural Development Planning set up on a permanent basis; Arts Council (Rat der Künste) founded; process implemented to develop up-to-date and transparent funding guidelines; final report made available online: https://www.netzwerk-kulturberatung.de/content/1-ueber/1-dr-patrick-s-foehl/1-publikationen/abschlussbericht-zur-kulturentwicklungsplanung-ergebnisse-und-massnahmen/kep-duesseldorf-abschlusbericht-web.pdf
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Cologne: 2019 Cultural Development Plan (Kulturentwicklungsplan)

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Department of Art and Culture of Cologne
Cologne Cultural Development Plan Steering Group (Lenkungskreis Kulturentwicklungsplan Köln)
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Diseño
Medios de comunicación
Música
Las artes escénicas
Industria editorial
Artes visuales
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Developing longer-term governance guidelines to underpin robust cultural infrastructure that promotes diversity of cultural expression in cities with due consideration to demographic and digital change; implementing global Sustainable Development Goals at the local level Target groups: City society and administration; stakeholders funding, creating and/or interested in cultural content Expected results: • Safeguarding, strengthening and expanding diverse cultural content • Setting objectives and concrete measures of municipal cultural policy for the coming years and creating planning certainty for cultural actors • Signposting the inclusion of cultural policy in city-wide planning and urban development • Identifying and protecting the public’s cultural interests • Promoting the transcultural openness of city society • Establishing and transmitting cities’ image as cultural sites across Germany and internationally • Bringing the activities of city administrations into line with the vision of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Possibilities, principles and problem-solving strategies of future cultural affairs policy discussed at a structural level with various stakeholders; specific policy requirements formulated; 2019 Cultural Development Planning published, with a focus on five key cross-cutting issues: (1) diversity, (2) creating spaces for art and culture, (3) bringing art and culture into the public sphere, (4) increasing financial support, (5) continuing cultural development planning as a participatory process; first Holger Czukay Prize for Pop Music, with €15,000 in prize money, awarded in 2019 in implementation of a Council cultural development planning decision
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Bayreuth: 2019 Cultural Development Plan (Kulturentwicklungsplan)

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
City Administration and City Council of Bayreuth
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Diseño
Medios de comunicación
Música
Las artes escénicas
Industria editorial
Artes visuales
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Developing longer-term governance guidelines to underpin robust cultural infrastructure that promotes diversity of cultural expression in cities with due consideration to demographic and digital change; implementing global Sustainable Development Goals at the local level Target groups: City society and administration; stakeholders funding, creating and/or interested in cultural content Expected results: • Safeguarding, strengthening and expanding diverse cultural content • Setting objectives and concrete measures of municipal cultural policy for the coming years and creating planning certainty for cultural actors • Signposting the inclusion of cultural policy in city-wide planning and urban development • Identifying and protecting the public’s cultural interests • Promoting the transcultural openness of city society • Establishing and transmitting cities’ image as cultural sites across Germany and internationally • Bringing the activities of city administrations into line with the vision of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Objectives and concrete measures of the city’s cultural affairs policy set out; events held with cultural actors from the city and the broader region; Bayreuth Cultural Declaration (Kulturerklärung) and Catalogue of Measures (Maßnahmenplan) developed as main components of the 2019 Cultural Development Plan, the chief measures including the following: ensuring provision of funding, establishing culture funds in local authorities, improving culture marketing, setting up a round table, establishing a baroque festival, improving the educational services offered by museums
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Leipzig: 2016–2020 Cultural Development Plan (Kulturentwicklungsplan)

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Department of Cultural Affairs of the City of Leipzig
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Diseño
Medios de comunicación
Música
Las artes escénicas
Industria editorial
Artes visuales
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Developing longer-term governance guidelines to underpin robust cultural infrastructure that promotes diversity of cultural expression in cities with due consideration to demographic and digital change; implementing global Sustainable Development Goals at the local level Target groups: City society and administration; stakeholders funding, creating and/or interested in cultural content Expected results: • Safeguarding, strengthening and expanding diverse cultural content • Setting objectives and concrete measures of municipal cultural policy for the coming years and creating planning certainty for cultural actors • Signposting the inclusion of cultural policy in city-wide planning and urban development • Identifying and protecting the public’s cultural interests • Promoting the transcultural openness of city society • Establishing and transmitting cities’ image as cultural sites across Germany and internationally • Bringing the activities of city administrations into line with the vision of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Workshops and discussions held; Cultural Development Plan adopted with three focuses: (1) making cultural diversity the city’s calling card, (2) developing strategies for nuanced, inclusive, cross-generational and intercultural participation, (3) exploring the City of Music’s potential for development and innovation
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Kassel: 2030 Cultural Vision (Kulturkonzeption)

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Office of Cultural Affairs of the City of Kassel
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Diseño
Medios de comunicación
Música
Las artes escénicas
Industria editorial
Artes visuales
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Developing longer-term governance guidelines to underpin robust cultural infrastructure that promotes diversity of cultural expression in cities with due consideration to demographic and digital change; implementing global Sustainable Development Goals at the local level Target groups: City society and administration; stakeholders funding, creating and/or interested in cultural content Expected results: • Safeguarding, strengthening and expanding diverse cultural content • Setting objectives and concrete measures of municipal cultural policy for the coming years and creating planning certainty for cultural actors • Signposting the inclusion of cultural policy in city-wide planning and urban development • Identifying and protecting the public’s cultural interests • Promoting the transcultural openness of city society • Establishing and transmitting cities’ image as cultural sites across Germany and internationally • Bringing the activities of city administrations into line with the vision of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Cultural Vision adopted, consisting of the final report on the participatory process, identification of priorities among the findings and a first round of implementation measures; Cultural Vision seen as a rolling plan that initiated the transformation process; investigations and participation-based process of analysis and communication conducted between July 2017 and June 2018, including three major culture workshops with cultural professionals, cultural affairs stakeholders from politics and administration, as well as representatives of the education, business, urban development and tourism sectors
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Mannheim: 2030 Mission Statement Mannheim (Leitbild Mannheim Hoch Zwei), adopted by the Municipal Council in 2019

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
City Administration of the City of Mannheim
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Diseño
Medios de comunicación
Música
Las artes escénicas
Industria editorial
Artes visuales
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Developing longer-term governance guidelines to underpin robust cultural infrastructure that promotes diversity of cultural expression in cities with due consideration to demographic and digital change; implementing global Sustainable Development Goals at the local level Target groups: City society and administration; stakeholders funding, creating and/or interested in cultural content Expected results: • Safeguarding, strengthening and expanding diverse cultural content • Setting objectives and concrete measures of municipal cultural policy for the coming years and creating planning certainty for cultural actors • Signposting the inclusion of cultural policy in city-wide planning and urban development • Identifying and protecting the public’s cultural interests • Promoting the transcultural openness of city society • Establishing and transmitting cities’ image as cultural sites across Germany and internationally • Bringing the activities of city administrations into line with the vision of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Vision of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals implemented in the activities of the administration; overall organisation as well as strategic objectives and performance indicators for the setting of the budget and other governance tools developed in line with that vision; projects of relevance to the city conducted in keeping with that vision, such as planning for the 2023 Federal Garden Show (Bundesgartenschau)
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Funding from City of Mannheim, Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

DANCE PACT Local-Regional-National (TANZPAKT Stadt–Land–Bund)

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Umbrella Association for Dance in Germany (Dachverband Tanz Deutschland)
DIEHL+RITTER gUG
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Las artes escénicas
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Artistically and structurally advancing the development of dance as an art form in Germany; strengthening the self-organisation and raising the profile of the dance scene Target groups: Ensembles; artists’ cooperatives; individual artists; production infrastructure and performance venues Expected results: Making substantial dance projects possible by means of a long-term increase in funding for excellence; conducting dialogue with local authorities and Länder on lasting involvement with the dance scene nationwide; applying principle of additionality of funding to guarantee that co-financing from Länder matches the funding from the federal budget
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
During the initial 2018–2021 project period, 15 projects were selected as eligible for funding by an independent jury of specialists and received financial and programmatic support; in 2019, positive development resulted in an extension into the first year of the coming 2021–2025 project period.
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Five-year federal funding of EU5.6 million (2017-2021); 50% co-financing by local authorities/Lander and, where applicable, additional funding providers, at least equal to the amount of federal funding; EU1.1 million for 2021 already approved by the German Bundestag in 2019

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
YES
If yes, what are the main conclusions/recommendations?: 

The model of cooperative division of labour to strengthen cultural diversity in the field of dance is achieving its objectives; positive assessment of the initial 2017-2018 project cycle led to an extension into the second project period, which begins in 2021.

Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
German Bundestag
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

healthywithart URBANCULTURE. Network of Bavarian Cities, 2019–2020

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
STADTKULTUR. Netzwerk Bayrischer Städte e.V.
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Música
Las artes escénicas
Industria editorial
Artes visuales
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Promoting the health and resilience of the public with and through art and culture; opening up museums to new audiences; fulfilling the public health mission of cultural institutions Target groups: General public of Bavaria Expected results: Using the positive physical, spiritual and mental effects of engaging with art to promote and strengthen health and help prevent chronic conditions; offering artistic and art-education workshops in museums to promote health; recognising ways in which cultural and art institutions can shape our environment to raise quality of life and improve health; encouraging local authorities to revise their thinking on preventive healthcare
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Pilot phase successfully implemented in 2018 in the form of an 80-day URBANCULTURE (STADTKULTUR) festival called “art&healthy;” (kunst&gesund;) with more than 33 exhibitions in 21 Bavarian cities attracting tens of thousands of visitors; longer-term programme initiated to promote and establish museums as good for people’s health; innovative measures and new ideas to promote health developed; museums and galleries recruited and established as providers of healthcare programmes; workshops they provide paid for by statutory health insurance provider AOK
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Bavarian AOK: EU250,000; total budget: EU450,000

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
health insurance provider Bavarian AOK
Type of entity: 
Private Sector
Name of partner: 
Medical School Hamburg
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Cultural and Creative Industries Initiative of the Federal Government, launched in 2009 and restructured in 2016

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy
Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Diseño
Medios de comunicación
Música
Las artes escénicas
Industria editorial
Artes visuales
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Improving the competitiveness of the cultural and creative sectors; spotlighting the potential of cultural and creative professionals for business and society Target groups: Freelance, independent and employed cultural and creative professionals; private-sector companies Expected results: • Creating jobs in these sectors and increasing the earning capacity of the people working in them • Raising the economic significance of the cultural and creative sectors • Building a denser network of ties between cultural and creative enterprises and traditional sectors of the economy • Sparking innovative ideas for other sectors • Encouraging coordination on relevant topics among the government departments responsible
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
• New in the 2016–2019 reporting period: Federal Centre of Excellence for the Cultural and Creative Industries (Kompetenzzentrum Kultur- und Kreativwirtschaft des Bundes) newly set up in 2016 and a Project Office opened in Berlin, flanking the initiative with projects, a regularly published magazine and academic research; most recent event in 2019: Cultural and Creative Industries Forum (Forum Kultur- und Kreativwirtschaft), a day-long conference with discussions and workshops • Each year, 32 companies honoured as Cultural and Creative Pilots (Kultur- und Kreativpiloten) for exemplary work on projects in the cultural and creative industries • Cultural and Creative Industries Monitoring Reports (Monitoringberichte über Kultur- und Kreativwirtschaft) published annually since 2009 by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, with the following focuses in the years of this reporting period: Internationalisation (2016); Employment and Skills (2017); The Cultural and Creative Industries – Stimulating the Overall Economy (2018); Cultural and Creative Industries in Rural Areas (2019)
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Funding total for 2016-2019: EU26.1 million (EU2.8 million in 2016 followed by EU7.8 million each year)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
YES
If yes, what are the main conclusions/recommendations?: 

* According to the 2017 Monitoring Report, the value created by the cultural and creative industries in 2016 was EU98.8 billion gross; the 2019 Monitoring Report found this figure had risen to EU100.5 billion in 2018; the Monitoring Reports highlight the innovative potential of the creative industries in relation to the various focus areas.
* It remains a challenge to assess the effects of non-technological innovations in the creative industries.

Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Federal Foreign Office
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Federal Ministry of Finance
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
u-institut Backes & Hustedt GbR
Type of entity: 
Private Sector

Culture is Strength. Education Alliances (Kultur macht stark. Bündnisse für Bildung), since 2013, evaluated in 2018

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Enabling children and young people to take part in cultural education regardless of their socio-economic backgrounds; offering opportunities for cultural education during and outside school hours; establishing cooperation between providers of education and/or culture at local and regional levels; triggering social developments and a sense of responsibility among the public; training artists for jobs in education; providing cultural affairs training for the coming generation of specialists and managers; supporting innovation in cultural education Target groups: Children and young people; schools associated with projects or programmes; multipliers; pupils; teachers; cultural stakeholders; artists; cultural institutions; potential international students with experience in the field who wish to expand their expertise in cultural affairs management Expected results: • Setting up cultural education measures in and outside schools as opportunities for educationally disadvantaged children and young people • Enabling pupils to enjoy better educational prospects and a greater sense of social belonging • Identifying project schools in the field of cultural education; providing training and networking opportunities for teaching staff and other art educators • Building long-term ties among schools with a focus on culture • Investigating the effect of performance art and musical education on pupils’ socio-emotional experience and career choices • Strengthening actors in amateur culture, particularly clubs, by creating opportunities to attract younger members • Enabling creators of cultural content to tackle the challenges posed by digitalisation, demographic change and globalisation • Offering programmes on personal development and good cultural leadership for the coming generation of specialists and managers
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
New in the 2016–2019 reporting period: programme evaluated from 2013 to 2017, final report published in 2018; between 2013 and 2019, a total of over 11,000 Education Alliances founded, more than 25,000 projects conducted with over 800,000 children and young people, over 90% of Alliances involved volunteers
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

EU222 million in federal funding spent between 2016 and 2020

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
YES
If yes, what are the main conclusions/recommendations?: 

Stated objectives of the "Culture is Strength" programme attained: children aged from 3 to 18 from educationally disadvantaged backgrounds who would have had no or limited access to culture enabled to participate in cultural events across Germany; local actors successfully networked; the evaluation of this measure for 2013 to 2017 is available online: https://www.bmbf.de/files/BMBF027_KMS%20Evaluation%20Schlussbericht_bf.pdf.

Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
German Non-Denominational Welfare Association (Paritätischer Wohlfahrtsverband)
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Name of partner: 
Union of Federal Associations for Cultural Youth Education (Bundesvereinigung Kulturelle Kinder- und Jugendbildung)
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Name of partner: 
Association of German Music Schools (Verband deutscher Musikschulen)
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Name of partner: 
German Adult Education Association (Deutscher Volkshochschulverband)
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)

Research Fund for Cultural Education (Forschungsfonds Kulturelle Bildung), 2018 to 2021

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Council for Cultural Education (Rat für Kulturelle Bildung)
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Enabling children and young people to take part in cultural education regardless of their socio-economic backgrounds; offering opportunities for cultural education during and outside school hours; establishing cooperation between providers of education and/or culture at local and regional levels; triggering social developments and a sense of responsibility among the public; training artists for jobs in education; providing cultural affairs training for the coming generation of specialists and managers; supporting innovation in cultural education Target groups: Children and young people; schools associated with projects or programmes; multipliers; pupils; teachers; cultural stakeholders; artists; cultural institutions; potential international students with experience in the field who wish to expand their expertise in cultural affairs management Expected results: • Setting up cultural education measures in and outside schools as opportunities for educationally disadvantaged children and young people • Enabling pupils to enjoy better educational prospects and a greater sense of social belonging • Identifying project schools in the field of cultural education; providing training and networking opportunities for teaching staff and other art educators • Building long-term ties among schools with a focus on culture • Investigating the effect of performance art and musical education on pupils’ socio-emotional experience and career choices • Strengthening actors in amateur culture, particularly clubs, by creating opportunities to attract younger members • Enabling creators of cultural content to tackle the challenges posed by digitalisation, demographic change and globalisation • Offering programmes on personal development and good cultural leadership for the coming generation of specialists and managers
Does it specifically target young people?: 
YES
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
First funding period successfully concluded in 2017 with six projects on the effect of cultural education; programme extended from 2018 to 2021 for four projects totalling €1.3 million
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Foundations: EU1.3 million between 2018 and 2021

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Mainz School of Music
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Hanover University of Music, Drama and Media
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Lübeck University of Music (MHL)
Name of partner: 
University of Bremen
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
University of Görtingen
Name of partner: 
Mercator Foundation
Type of entity: 
Private Sector
Name of partner: 
Karl Schlecht Foundation
Type of entity: 
Private Sector

Project for a Cultural Education Platform (Projekt Plattform Kulturelle Bildung) run in Brandenburg since 2017

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Brandenburg Society for Culture and History (Brandenburgische Gesellschaft für Kultur und Geschichte gGmbH, BGK)
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Enabling children and young people to take part in cultural education regardless of their socio-economic backgrounds; offering opportunities for cultural education during and outside school hours; establishing cooperation between providers of education and/or culture at local and regional levels; triggering social developments and a sense of responsibility among the public; training artists for jobs in education; providing cultural affairs training for the coming generation of specialists and managers; supporting innovation in cultural education Target groups: Children and young people; schools associated with projects or programmes; multipliers; pupils; teachers; cultural stakeholders; artists; cultural institutions; potential international students with experience in the field who wish to expand their expertise in cultural affairs management Expected results: • Setting up cultural education measures in and outside schools as opportunities for educationally disadvantaged children and young people • Enabling pupils to enjoy better educational prospects and a greater sense of social belonging • Identifying project schools in the field of cultural education; providing training and networking opportunities for teaching staff and other art educators • Building long-term ties among schools with a focus on culture • Investigating the effect of performance art and musical education on pupils’ socio-emotional experience and career choices • Strengthening actors in amateur culture, particularly clubs, by creating opportunities to attract younger members • Enabling creators of cultural content to tackle the challenges posed by digitalisation, demographic change and globalisation • Offering programmes on personal development and good cultural leadership for the coming generation of specialists and managers
Does it specifically target young people?: 
YES
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Major new element in the 2016–2019 reporting period: three project-based jobs created to facilitate communication with widely scattered stakeholders (cf. 2016 Periodic Report, p. 20ff.)
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Land government; foundation funding: annual budget of approx. EU500,000

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
YES
If yes, what are the main conclusions/recommendations?: 

Evidence found of positive effect of musical education on pupils' linguistic development

Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Mercator Foundation
Type of entity: 
Private Sector

Schools Meet Culture – Culture Meets Schools (Schule trifft Kultur – Kultur trifft Schule), run in Schleswig-Holstein since 2016

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Schleswig-Holstein Ministry of Education, Science and Culture
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Enabling children and young people to take part in cultural education regardless of their socio-economic backgrounds; offering opportunities for cultural education during and outside school hours; establishing cooperation between providers of education and/or culture at local and regional levels; triggering social developments and a sense of responsibility among the public; training artists for jobs in education; providing cultural affairs training for the coming generation of specialists and managers; supporting innovation in cultural education Target groups: Children and young people; schools associated with projects or programmes; multipliers; pupils; teachers; cultural stakeholders; artists; cultural institutions; potential international students with experience in the field who wish to expand their expertise in cultural affairs management Expected results: • Setting up cultural education measures in and outside schools as opportunities for educationally disadvantaged children and young people • Enabling pupils to enjoy better educational prospects and a greater sense of social belonging • Identifying project schools in the field of cultural education; providing training and networking opportunities for teaching staff and other art educators • Building long-term ties among schools with a focus on culture • Investigating the effect of performance art and musical education on pupils’ socio-emotional experience and career choices • Strengthening actors in amateur culture, particularly clubs, by creating opportunities to attract younger members • Enabling creators of cultural content to tackle the challenges posed by digitalisation, demographic change and globalisation • Offering programmes on personal development and good cultural leadership for the coming generation of specialists and managers
Does it specifically target young people?: 
YES
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Qualifications attained by 85 cultural educators through regular regional and supraregional conferences; around 165 schools and more than 3000 pupils involved
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Mercator Foundation; Land government: approx. EU1.7 million for the reporting period

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
YES
If yes, what are the main conclusions/recommendations?: 

Evaluation begun in 2019 to establish the conditions for success of cultural education

Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Mercator Foundation
Type of entity: 
Private Sector
Name of partner: 
Schleswig-Holstein Institute for Quality Development in Schools (Institut für Qualitätsentwicklung an Schulen)
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Europa-Universität Flensburg (university of applied sciences)
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Creative Practice (Kreative Praxis), run in Saarland since 2016

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Saarland Ministry of Education and Cultural Affairs
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Enabling children and young people to take part in cultural education regardless of their socio-economic backgrounds; offering opportunities for cultural education during and outside school hours; establishing cooperation between providers of education and/or culture at local and regional levels; triggering social developments and a sense of responsibility among the public; training artists for jobs in education; providing cultural affairs training for the coming generation of specialists and managers; supporting innovation in cultural education Target groups: Children and young people; schools associated with projects or programmes; multipliers; pupils; teachers; cultural stakeholders; artists; cultural institutions; potential international students with experience in the field who wish to expand their expertise in cultural affairs management Expected results: • Setting up cultural education measures in and outside schools as opportunities for educationally disadvantaged children and young people • Enabling pupils to enjoy better educational prospects and a greater sense of social belonging • Identifying project schools in the field of cultural education; providing training and networking opportunities for teaching staff and other art educators • Building long-term ties among schools with a focus on culture • Investigating the effect of performance art and musical education on pupils’ socio-emotional experience and career choices • Strengthening actors in amateur culture, particularly clubs, by creating opportunities to attract younger members • Enabling creators of cultural content to tackle the challenges posed by digitalisation, demographic change and globalisation • Offering programmes on personal development and good cultural leadership for the coming generation of specialists and managers
Does it specifically target young people?: 
YES
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Some 300 cultural projects implemented annually at non-specialist schools
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Land Academy for Musical and Cultural Education (Landesakademie fur musisch-kulturelle Bildung); lottery company Saarland-Sporttoto GmbH: approx. EU320,000 per school year from 2016 to 2019, including complementary resources from the Land Academy for Musical and Cultural Education and the company Arbeit und Kultur Saarland GmbH

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Arbeit und Kultur Saarland GmbH
Type of entity: 
Private Sector
Name of partner: 
Land Academy for Musical and Cultural Education of Saarland
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Master’s degree programme in Arts and Cultural Management, run since 2018

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Goethe-Institut e.V.
Leuphana University Lüneburg
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Enabling children and young people to take part in cultural education regardless of their socio-economic backgrounds; offering opportunities for cultural education during and outside school hours; establishing cooperation between providers of education and/or culture at local and regional levels; triggering social developments and a sense of responsibility among the public; training artists for jobs in education; providing cultural affairs training for the coming generation of specialists and managers; supporting innovation in cultural education Target groups: Children and young people; schools associated with projects or programmes; multipliers; pupils; teachers; cultural stakeholders; artists; cultural institutions; potential international students with experience in the field who wish to expand their expertise in cultural affairs management Expected results: • Setting up cultural education measures in and outside schools as opportunities for educationally disadvantaged children and young people • Enabling pupils to enjoy better educational prospects and a greater sense of social belonging • Identifying project schools in the field of cultural education; providing training and networking opportunities for teaching staff and other art educators • Building long-term ties among schools with a focus on culture • Investigating the effect of performance art and musical education on pupils’ socio-emotional experience and career choices • Strengthening actors in amateur culture, particularly clubs, by creating opportunities to attract younger members • Enabling creators of cultural content to tackle the challenges posed by digitalisation, demographic change and globalisation • Offering programmes on personal development and good cultural leadership for the coming generation of specialists and managers
Does it specifically target young people?: 
YES
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Online degree programme created for 20 international students to improve decentralised qualification options
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

The degree programme is financed from contributions; the administrative costs are covered by Leuphana University Luneburg and the Goethe-Institut to the amount of EU305,000

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Research projects on cultural education (Federal Ministry of Education and Research)

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Enabling children and young people to take part in cultural education regardless of their socio-economic backgrounds; offering opportunities for cultural education during and outside school hours; establishing cooperation between providers of education and/or culture at local and regional levels; triggering social developments and a sense of responsibility among the public; training artists for jobs in education; providing cultural affairs training for the coming generation of specialists and managers; supporting innovation in cultural education Target groups: Children and young people; schools associated with projects or programmes; multipliers; pupils; teachers; cultural stakeholders; artists; cultural institutions; potential international students with experience in the field who wish to expand their expertise in cultural affairs management Expected results: • Setting up cultural education measures in and outside schools as opportunities for educationally disadvantaged children and young people • Enabling pupils to enjoy better educational prospects and a greater sense of social belonging • Identifying project schools in the field of cultural education; providing training and networking opportunities for teaching staff and other art educators • Building long-term ties among schools with a focus on culture • Investigating the effect of performance art and musical education on pupils’ socio-emotional experience and career choices • Strengthening actors in amateur culture, particularly clubs, by creating opportunities to attract younger members • Enabling creators of cultural content to tackle the challenges posed by digitalisation, demographic change and globalisation • Offering programmes on personal development and good cultural leadership for the coming generation of specialists and managers
Does it specifically target young people?: 
YES
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
“Empirical education research” programme expanded: 25 research projects on digitalisation in cultural education supported; research projects on cultural education in rural areas supported since 2019
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Digitalisation in cultural education: EU9.5 million up to 2022; cultural education in rural areas: EU12.1 million (2019-2023)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

360° – Fund for New City Cultures (360° – Fonds für Kulturen der neuen Stadtgesellschaft), since 2010, calls for applications in 2018 and 2019

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Federal Cultural Foundation (Kulturstiftung des Bundes)
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Facilitating culturally diverse community life; using the positive role of art and culture in the development of an immigration-rich society Promoting greater openness to diversity among cultural institutions; talking about immigration and cultural diversity in cultural institutions and urban society; reducing structural exclusion from cultural life Target groups: General public; cultural actors; political decision-makers; cultural institutions; associations; trade unions; foundations; civil society; professional artists; focus on refugees Expected results: Seeing the cultural diversity of the cities’ societies reflected in the programmes, staff and audiences of their cultural institutions; drawing up proposals and measures for diversifying institutions and helping to foster an open society; having participating institutions share their experience and expand their skills
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
In the two rounds of applications in 2017 and 2018, some €13.9 million was allocated to 39 cultural institutions: 16 museums, 13 theatres, eight libraries, one music school and one symphony orchestra; information and consultation events held in several German towns and cities in 2017 and 2018
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Funding of EU13.9 million for the 2017 and 2018 rounds of applications; total funding of EU21 million for 2016 to 2024; funding for one project-related job in the cultural institution in question plus additional project funds of up to EU100,000 per institution through the German Federal Cultural Foundation - contingent on co-financing of at least EU50,000 for each institution from its own or third-party resources

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Cultural Integration Initiative (Initiative Kulturelle Integration), since 2016

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
German Culture Council (Deutscher Kulturrat)
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Facilitating culturally diverse community life; using the positive role of art and culture in the development of an immigration-rich society Promoting respectful coexistence and equal rights in an increasingly heterogeneous society Target groups: General public; cultural actors; political decision-makers; cultural institutions; associations; trade unions; foundations; civil society; professional artists; focus on refugees Expected results: Spotlighting ways in which cohesion can succeed in a diverse society and art and culture can contribute to integration; pooling and disseminating information about stakeholders, funding options and events; strengthening the competence, democratic participation, equality of opportunity and protection from discrimination of people with a personal or family background of migration and/or displacement
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Fifteen theses on cultural integration and cohesion presented to the Federal Government in 2017; gala event held with the German Institute for Human Rights (Deutsches Institut für Menschenrechte) and first forum convened to launch the National Action Plan on Integration (Nationaler Aktionsplan Integration); joint campaign conducted with McDonalds (#mehralseinhashtag – “more than a hashtag”); internet portal set up and newsletter sent out regularly
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

The Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media: EU1.5 million between 2018 and 2020

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Culture Opens Worlds (Kultur öffnet Welten), since 2015

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Young Ears Network (Netzwerk Junge Ohren)
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Facilitating culturally diverse community life; using the positive role of art and culture in the development of an immigration-rich society Contributing significantly to the development of a diverse cultural sector across all areas Target groups: General public; cultural actors; political decision-makers; cultural institutions; associations; trade unions; foundations; civil society; professional artists; focus on refugees Expected results: Raising the visibility of participants’ commitment nationwide; having cultural actors build ties to existing networks and to one another; contributing to the development of a diverse cultural sector; raising awareness of the goals of the 2005 UNESCO Convention
Does it specifically target young people?: 
YES
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Network for Diversity in Germany’s Cultural Sector (Netzwerk für Diversität im Kulturbereich in Deutschland) built up with more than 700 professional participants registered; primarily under-represented cultural actors featured in podcasts; several hundred consultations conducted on project and format development, strategies, financing, partnership structures, etc.; formats developed for workshops and training on diversity, migration, integration, accessibility and social cohesion; information from the network about job vacancies, specialist events and best practice disseminated on social media; Special Award presented as part of Culture Opens Worlds (Kultur öffnet Welten) in 2016 and 2017 to honour the outstanding dedication of recipients – music group Banda Internationale, film festival Kino Asyl and museum project Multaka in 2016 and youth centre Demokratiebahnhof Anklam, orchestra academy Kammerakademie Potsdam and community culture project NEW HAMBURG in 2017; awareness of cultural participation and diversity issues actively raised among associations/trade unions; objectives of the 2005 UNESCO Convention actively adopted by network members
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

EU260,000, including the Culture Opens Worlds Special Award (2016 and 2017); as part of the KIWit group from 2017 - EU150,000 (2017 and 2018); EU200,000 (2018 and 2019); EU200,000 (2019 and 2020)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Refugee Amateur Music Project (Flüchtlingsprojekt in der Laienmusik), since 2015

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
North Rhine-Westphalia Music Council (Landesmusikrat)
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Música
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Facilitating culturally diverse community life; using the positive role of art and culture in the development of an immigration-rich society Socially and musically integrating refugee musicians into North Rhine-Westphalia’s society and music scene Target groups: General public; cultural actors; political decision-makers; cultural institutions; associations; trade unions; foundations; civil society; professional artists; focus on refugees Expected results: Getting refugee musicians involved on an equal footing in the projects funded; creating lasting structures linking those running the projects, those working with refugees and the refugee musicians themselves; encouraging refugee musicians to launch and conduct projects of their own; strengthening popular acceptance of refugees’ culture through performances on public stages; seeing musical efforts appreciated and audiences’ listening habits expanded
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Over 200 projects carried out since 2015; refugee ensembles actively accompanied to performances; strong commitment shown by refugee musicians; number of projects headed by people with recent refugee histories, who serve as intermediaries and multipliers, increased
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

55 music associations under the aegis of the North Rhine-Westphalia Music Council; funded institutions and initiatives of cultural life in North Rhine-Westphalia

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

*foundationClass programme for artists and designers in exile, since 2014

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
weißensee academy of art berlin (weißensee kunsthochschule berlin)
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Diseño
Medios de comunicación
Música
Las artes escénicas
Industria editorial
Artes visuales
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Facilitating culturally diverse community life; using the positive role of art and culture in the development of an immigration-rich society Supporting refugees who had started or intended to start studying art or design in their country of origin or wish to switch degree programmes Target groups: General public; cultural actors; political decision-makers; cultural institutions; associations; trade unions; foundations; civil society; professional artists; focus on refugees Expected results: Preparing refugees for the entrance exams of art and design colleges; supporting participants in reconstructing and/or creating lost documents, pictures, certification, portfolios and other materials; providing refugees with college infrastructure, including access to teaching and facilities, as well as help dealing with public authorities
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
*foundationClass programme attended by 129 people, though not all went on to apply to art college; 35 people with a refugee background enrolled at German art colleges; large number of people put in touch with grants, residencies and jobs in art or culture through *foundationClass; *foundationClass involved as a participating artists’ collective in exhibitions and festivals, including the West gallery in The Hague in 2016, the Maxim Gorki Theatre’s Berlin Autumn Salon in 2017, Berlin’s Hamburger Bahnhof Museum of Contemporary Art (Museum für Gegenwart) in 2018, the side programme for the 10th Berlin Biennale festival in 2018 and the After Europe Festival in Berlin’s Sophiensäle in 2019; contributions written for online and print publications; participation in panel discussions and conferences on the development of diversity in the artistic and cultural sector as well as art and exile
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Funding from the Quality and Innovation Initiative of the Berlin Senate Department for Education, Youth and Science: EU161,000 (2017-2019), Arab Fund for Arts and Culture, DAAD Welcome, Power of the Arts and the Deutsche Bank Endowment Fund (Stiftungsfonds Deutsche Bank)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Berlin University of the Arts (Universität der Künste Berlin)
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
New Society for Visual Arts (neue Gesellschaft für bildende Kunst)
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Name of partner: 
Biennale Dance Training (Biennale Tanzausbildung)
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Name of partner: 
neighbourhood initiative Neue Nachbarschaft // Moabit
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Name of partner: 
Leipzig Academy of Fine Arts (Hochschule für Grafik und Buchkunst)
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Konrad Wolf Film University (Filmuniversität Babelsberg Konrad Wolf)
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
feldfünf culture platform
Type of entity: 
Private Sector
Name of partner: 
Berlin Cultural Education Project Fund (Berliner Projektfonds Kulturelle Bildung)
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
SAVVY Contemporary
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Name of partner: 
Mousonturm Gallery (Künstlerhaus Mousonturm)
Type of entity: 
Private Sector

INTRO funding programme, since 2019

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Hamburg Ministry of Culture and Media (Behörde für Kultur und Medien)
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Facilitating culturally diverse community life; using the positive role of art and culture in the development of an immigration-rich society Helping to generate new perspectives through collaboration of Hamburg cultural institutions from various fields with artists from different countries of origin; sparking new ideas in Hamburg’s urban culture Target groups: General public; cultural actors; political decision-makers; cultural institutions; associations; trade unions; foundations; civil society; professional artists; focus on refugees Expected results: Bringing together refugee artists and Hamburg cultural institutions for one-year collaborations; grants awarded by a jury of specialists promoting international artistic exchange
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Nine projects implemented in 2019–2020; programme offered to assist start-ups/freelancing; employment opportunities created by means of networking and financial support
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Total for the first nine projects: EU210,000, of which EU1500 monthly for the artist and EU500 monthly in project funds for the institution

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
German Playhouse (Deutsches Schauspielhaus)
Type of entity: 
Private Sector
Name of partner: 
LICHTHOF Theatre, Hamburg
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Name of partner: 
community centre GWA St. Pauli
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Name of partner: 
community centre Kulturladen St. Georg
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Name of partner: 
Hoheluftschiff Children’s Theatre
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Name of partner: 
Kampnagel art space
Type of entity: 
Private Sector
Name of partner: 
Hamburg Conservatoire (Hamburger Konservatorium)
Type of entity: 
Private Sector
Name of partner: 
Ohnsorg Theatre
Type of entity: 
Private Sector
Name of partner: 
broadcaster TIDE GmbH
Type of entity: 
Private Sector

Culture and Inclusion Network (Netzwerk Kultur und Inklusion), since 2015

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
1. Federal and North Rhine-Westphalia Academy for Cultural Education (Akademie der Kulturellen Bildung des Bundes und des Landes NRW e.V.)
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Diseño
Medios de comunicación
Música
Las artes escénicas
Artes visuales
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Actively facilitating participation in artistic life by artists with disabilities, not only as consumers but primarily as creators Target groups: Political representatives of the Länder and the Federal Government; Equal Opportunities Commissioners of the Länder; people with and without disabilities; multipliers in the art and education sectors Expected results: Reflecting on and starting a national conversation about issues pertaining to the culture/inclusion interface; initiating political dialogue on improving the situation for artists with disabilities, at universities, in the media, on the job market and in the field of cultural promotion
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
National Action Plan 2.0 updated and reformulated in respect of Article 30 (2) of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Financed from federal funds, Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
InTakt e.V.
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)

German libraries implementing the Marrakesh Treaty, 2018

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Medibus Media Society for Blind, Visually Impaired and Print Disabled People (Medibus e.V. – Mediengemeinschaft für blinde, seh- und lesebehinderte Menschen)
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Enabling all people, irrespective of origins, levels of education or disabilities, to access information and literature without hindrance Target groups: Political representatives of the Länder and the Federal Government; Equal Opportunities Commissioners of the Länder; people with and without disabilities; multipliers in the art and education sectors Expected results: Preparing published works for usable physical and digital formats for visually impaired and print disabled people; facilitating international exchange of accessible formats; making reading material available in braille and in the accessible audiobook standard DAISY (Digital Accessible Information System) for user groups of people with physical and print disabilities; raising awareness among publishers of the needs of visually impaired and print disabled users; supporting the transfer of content into accessible formats; providing publishers with tools like BACC (Born Accessible Content Checker) free of charge
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Section 45 (a) et seqq. of Germany’s Copyright Act amended; communication furthered with various target groups; list of authorised entities published through the German Patent and Trade Mark Office; around 45,000 audiobooks in DAISY format made available for loan through public libraries from the collection of dzb lesen, the German Centre for Accessible Reading (Deutsches Zentrum für barrierefreies Lesen, through initiatives such as “Opportunity Inclusion” https://www.dzblesen.de/en/index.html); Working Group on Accessibility in (Digital) Public Libraries (AG Barrierefreiheit in (digitalen) öffentlichen Bibliotheken) set up; libraries opened up for the whole spectrum of accessibility issues
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Financed from Land funds

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Union of the Association of Retailers of Audiobooks for Blind People (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Blindenhörbüchereien e.V.)
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Name of partner: 
Association of Braille Printers and Libraries (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Blindenschriftdruckereien und -bibliotheken e.V.)
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Name of partner: 
Media Society for the Blind and Visually Impaired (Mediengemeinschaft für Blinde und Sehbehinderte e.V.)
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)

Creating an accessibility provision in the Deutsche Welle Act implementing the EU Audiovisual Media Services Directive, 2018

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Federal Government
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Promoting participation in the media by people with disabilities Target groups: Political representatives of the Länder and the Federal Government; Equal Opportunities Commissioners of the Länder; people with and without disabilities; multipliers in the art and education sectors Expected results: Gradually and continuously improving access to the services of broadcaster Deutsche Welle for people with disabilities
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Accessibility provision created in the bill to amend the Deutsche Welle Act (section 7a) several written opinions on the ministry draft were submitted in 2019 in the course of the legislative process and are available here: https://www.bmwi.de/Navigation/DE/Service/Stellungnahmen/4-TMGAendG/stellungnahmen-4-tmgaendg.html
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Financed from federal funds

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Culture in the Kleisthaus, since 2001, indefinite term

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Federal Government Commissioner for Matters Relating to Persons with Disabilities
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Promoting participation by people with disabilities and artists with disabilities as recipients and actors; raising public awareness with the aim of establishing “inclusion for all” in the cultural sector Target groups: Political representatives of the Länder and the Federal Government; Equal Opportunities Commissioners of the Länder; people with and without disabilities; multipliers in the art and education sectors Expected results: Supporting participation in art and culture by people with disabilities, as recipients and actors; e.g. accessible events such as exhibitions, concerts and panel discussions at the offices of the Federal Government Commissioner for Matters Relating to Persons with Disabilities. Cooperation with various actors in the cultural sphere in order to advocate for inclusion and raise awareness
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Awareness-raising within the meaning of Article 30 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Financed from federal funds, Federal Government Commissioner for Matters Relating to Persons with Disabilities

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Berlin International Film Festival (Berlinale)
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Name of partner: 
Deutsche Kinemathek – Museum of Film and Television
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Name of partner: 
Goldener Spatz children’s media festival
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)

Media Diversity

Public service media has a legal or statutory remit to promote a diversity of cultural expressions: 
YES
Policies and measures promote content diversity in programming by supporting: 
Regional and/or local broadcasters
Linguistic diversity in media programming
Community programming for marginalised groups (e.g. indigenous peoples, migrants and refugees, etc.)
Socio-cultural programming (e.g. children, youth, people with disabilities, etc.)
Domestic content regulations for audio-visual media exist (e.g. quotas for production or distribution requirements for national films, TV series or music on radio): 
NO
Regulatory authority(ies) monitoring media exist: 
YES
If YES, please provide the name and year of establishment of the regulatory authority(ies): 
14 regional State Media Authorities
Broadcasting Councils
German Press Council
If YES, these regulatory authority(ies) monitor: 
Public media
Community media
Private sector media
Online media
If YES, these regulatory authority(ies) are responsible for: 
Issuing licenses to broadcasters, content providers, platforms
Receiving and addressing public complaints such as online harassment, fake news, hate speech, etc.
Monitoring cultural (including linguistic) obligations
Monitoring gender equality in the media
Monitoring editorial independence of the media
Monitoring diversity in media ownership (diversity of ownership structures, transparency of ownership rules, limits on ownership concentration, etc.)
Relevant Policies and Measures: 

Diversity Monitor of the Land Media Authorities (Medienvielfaltsmonitor der Landesanstalten für Medien), since 2015

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
The 14 Land Media Authorities (Landesanstalten für Medien), responsible for licensing and monitoring private radio and television broadcasters
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Examining developments in Germany’s broadcasting and media landscape with a focus on the development of media diversity; creating transparency in the media Target groups: General public; media policy decision-makers; specialist journalists; interested individuals Expected results: • Demonstrating the importance of the media in the democratic shaping of information and opinion by collating and measuring empirical data • Analysing and making public the potential opinion-shaping power of media companies and conglomerates • On the basis of the data collected, providing politicians with material to inform their decision-making
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
• Active since 2015 as a joint project of all the Land Media Authorities in Germany; the 2019 report found as follows: television has the greatest opinion-forming clout in Germany, closely followed by the internet; more than half of the market share in the opinion-shaping sector in Germany is held by the top five media conglomerates (54.6%); the opinion-forming clout of online media continues to rise, while television and daily newspapers are in continuous decline; radio was also slightly less relevant in 2019 than it had been; in the first quarter of 2019, television remained just ahead of the internet, at 32.2% compared to 28.7%; full report available here: https://www.die-medienanstalten.de/fileadmin/user_upload/die_medienanstalten/Themen/Forschung/Medienvielfaltsmonitor/Medienanstalten_MedienVielfaltsMonitor.pdf • Figures and data picked up by sector-specific services; increased attention paid to the Media Diversity Monitor • Findings of the Media Diversity Monitor considered by Land Media Authorities and Land officials responsible for broadcasting when amending the Interstate Broadcasting Agreement (Rundfunkstaatsvertrag), cf. p. 35 of the Sixth Report on the Development of Media Concentration published in 2018 by the Commission on Concentration in the Media (Kommission zur Ermittlung der Konzentration im Medienbereich) • Mentioned by the Monopolies Commission (Monopolkommission) in relation to the turnover of video-on-demand services in Germany, cf. p. 346 of its 22nd Biennial Report (Hauptgutachten), 2018
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Amendment of the Interstate Media Agreement (Medienstaatsvertrag) to implement the EU Audiovisual Media Services Directive, 2018 to 2019

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
All 16 Länder of the Federal Republic of Germany
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Ensuring equal opportunities in communication offline and online by means of adapted, appropriate and jointly accepted rules; implementing the provisions of the European Audiovisual Media Services (AVMS) Directive, as amended in 2018, at the national level; guaranteeing protection of young people in relation to the media Target groups: Media consumers in Germany Expected results: Adopting transparency rules and prohibitions against discrimination to govern influential media platforms, user interfaces and media intermediaries like smart speakers, search engines, smart TVs and cable network providers; updating the definition and concept of broadcasting: services with few users or which are provided sporadically or irregularly will no longer require a broadcasting licence; incorporating the results of the evaluation of the AVMS Directive conducted across Europe in 2016 into the amendment of the Interstate Media Agreement
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
More than 1200 comments and contributions received in the first participation procedure in 2018; second public participation procedure held in 2019 as part of the process to amend the Interstate Media Agreement; amendment adopted on 5 December 2019
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Amendment of copyright law to implement the EU Copyright Directives amended in April 2019, 2019 to 2021

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Adapting copyright law to the requirements of a digital society; implementing the provisions of the amended European Directive on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market (Copyright Directive) adopted in 2019; strengthening copyright Target groups: Originators of creative content; collective rights management organisations and publishers, including press publishers; creative industries; users of cultural content; general public Expected results: Conducting public consultation on the implementation of the two EU Copyright Directives of 17 April 2019 – the Digital Single Market Directive, (EU) 2019/790, and the Satellite and Cable Directive, (EU) 2019/789 and on the discussion draft for a first bill to adapt copyright law to the requirements of the Digital Single Market dated 15 January 2020; creating an opportunity for stakeholders and institutions involved to submit public and comprehensive opinions
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
First consultation procedure held from June to September 2019; over 130 opinions received from initiatives, associations, networks, institutes and businesses; legislative process begun with the discussion draft of 15 January 2020 for a first bill to adapt copyright law to the requirements of the Digital Single Market (Erstes Gesetz zur Anpassung des Urheberrechts an die Erfordernisse des digitalen Binnenmarkts); further consultation procedure conducted in January 2020; 110 statements received from initiatives, associations, networks, institutes and businesses: https://www.bmjv.de/SharedDocs/Gesetzgebungsverfahren/DE/ Gesetz_I_Anpassung-Urheberrecht-dig-Binnenmarkt.html
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Establishment of the youth service “funk” in 2016

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Broadcaster SWR (Südwestrundfunk)
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Creating contemporary content for adolescents and young adults; familiarising and involving a young audience with the output of public broadcasters; examining matters of democracy and social cohesion to actively address the social, democratic and cultural needs of 14- to 29-year-olds Target groups: 14- to 29-year-olds of all genders Expected results: Generating media output for young users on social and political topics, thereby filling a crucial gap; reaching mobile and internet-savvy target audiences by having “funk” play its content via major private media platforms
Does it specifically target young people?: 
YES
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Videos put out via more than 60 distribution channels and posted on www.funk.net; opportunity created for collaboration with partners from the internet video scene and young media creators; 291 million views achieved on YouTube and 102 million on Facebook between October 2016 and October 2017
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

EU45 million

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Association of Public Broadcasting Corporations in the Federal Republic of Germany (ARD)
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Second German Television (ZDF)
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Establishment of the radio station COSMO in 2017 as a counterpoint to COSMO TV, previously on air as Funkhaus Europa

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Broadcaster WDR (Westdeutscher Rundfunk Köln)
Radio Bremen
broadcaster RBB (Rundfunk Berlin-Brandenburg)
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Providing a publicly produced, multilingual radio schedule with an international focus for people from across the globe, specifically highlighting information and news for recent refugees Target groups: People from all over the world who live in North Rhine-Westphalia, Bremen, Berlin and Brandenburg as well as newly arrived refugees Expected results: Having COSMO Radio further develop its media output for multilingual listeners in Germany to promote their participation in cultural life; communicating cultural diversity and a broad spectrum of perspectives through spoken-word and musical contributions; introducing a complementary daily jazz and world music slot on culture radio channel WDR 3, with output including music of diverse styles from outside Europe
Does it specifically target young people?: 
YES
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Listeners addressed in German and in ten other languages: Turkish, Italian, Greek, Spanish, Russian, Polish, Bosnian, Croat, Serbian, Kurdish; up to a million listeners reached per day across Germany in 2019; the panoply of global pop music made available to listeners in Germany in eleven languages as Global Sounds Radio; programme segments offered in Arabic under the name Refugee Radio, with news, information and services for recent refugees; non-European music of diverse styles presented in the daily jazz and world music slot on the culture channel WDR 3
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Entorno digital

Policies, measures or mechanisms are in place to support the digital transformation of cultural and creative industries and institutions (e.g. funding for digitization of analogue industries): 
YES
Policies or measures have been introduced to ensure vibrant domestic digital cultural and creative industries markets with a diversity of e-players of all sizes (e.g. fair remuneration rules; control market concentration; prevention of monopolies of digital content providers/distributors or their algorithms that potentially restrict the diversity of cultural expressions, etc.):: 
YES
Policies and measures have been implemented to enhance access to and discoverability of domestically produced cultural content in the digital environment (e.g. action plans or policies for digital content pluralism, public support to cultural or artistic portals in specific languages, national or regional online distribution platforms for domestic content, etc.): 
YES
Measures and initiatives have been implemented to promote digital creativity and competencies of artists and other cultural professionals working with new technologies (e.g. spaces for experimentation, incubators, etc.): 
YES
Statistics or studies with recent data on access to digital media, including on the type of cultural content available through digital media, are available: 
YES
Percentage of the population with subscriptions to online cultural content providers (e.g. Netflix, Spotify, Amazon, etc.): 
27.30%
2019
Relevant Policies and Measures: 

SmartCULTURE (SmartKULTUR), Land Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, since 2017

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Land Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Using digital means to preserve written and audiovisual cultural assets and artists’ archives and to make them accessible Target groups: University libraries in Rostock and Greifswald; institutions that preserve cultural assets, such as libraries, archives, museums, churches and foundations in Land Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania Expected results: Supporting projects that protect from damage, loss or destruction unique written and audiovisual cultural assets which hold significant meaning for Land Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania; founding centres of excellence on conservation and digitisation at the Rostock and Greifswald university libraries
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Approx. 300 decentralised projects supported every year; an online culture portal for Land Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (https://www.kultur-mv.de/) went live in 2016; the Land Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania digital library went online in 2018; Land Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania digital agenda adopted in 2018
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Up to EU100,000 per project

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Rostock University Library
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Greifswald University library
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Centre for Digitisation and Culture (Zentrum für Digitalisierung und Kultur), Land Schleswig-Holstein, since 2018

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Land Schleswig-Holstein
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Digitally transforming the cultural infrastructure of Land Schleswig-Holstein and facilitating cooperation between cultural institutions Target groups: Cultural institutions, Land universities, theatres and museums, the open-access channel of the public service broadcaster Expected results: Setting up a centre for digitisation and culture; supporting cultural institutions in their digital transformation through education programmes, subsidies, projects and advice; networking the centre with Kiel University of Applied Sciences (Fachhochschule Kiel) and setting up exchange opportunities
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Building on the Land’s digital master plan on culture, standards and offerings for institutions and cultural actors drafted which focus on reflecting digitality in cultural policy, audience development, marketing, data use, developing strategies for digital transformation, change management and archiving and digitising cultural heritage
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

EU500,000 annually, in total EU1.5 million; the equivalent of two full-time positions

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
If yes, what are the main conclusions/recommendations?: 

Results of the evaluation are due to be provided in 2022

Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Land Schleswig-Holstein library (Landesbibliothek Schleswig-Holstein)
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Digital Culture (Kultur Digital), 2018 to 2024

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
German Federal Cultural Foundation
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Enabling cultural institutions to make full use of digital possibilities and to tailor use to their respective specific activities; supporting cultural institutions in their efforts to proactively seize the opportunities offered by digital possibilities and address the corresponding challenges in a professional manner Target groups: Publicly funded cultural institutions and associations such as museums, theatres, concert and literature venues Expected results: Financially supporting the (further) development of public cultural institutions’ digital planning; facilitating exchange with experts on digital matters; promoting in particular measures for the production of digital art, digital curation and the use of digital means to disseminate content and communicate
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Over eight culture-hackathons run since 2014; Digital Fund (Fonds Digital) support since 2020, submission deadline for projects was July 2019; Academy for Theatre and Digitality https://theater.digital/ founded and grant programme launched in 2019
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

EU21,000 (2018); forecast EU485,000 (2019), total of EU18 million in funding (2018 to 2024)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Digital Pathways to the Museum (Digitale Wege ins Museum), 2017 to 2020

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts, Land Baden-Württemberg
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Facilitating access to art and culture through new digital rooms for experience; enabling museums to open up to new audience segments and groups Target groups: Young people, pupils, families, new visitor groups Expected results: Opening up museums to an even wider audience through digital dissemination methods and setting them up to remain relevant in the future; stepping up Citizen Science programmes to get visitors interested in specialist subjects
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
The following focus points set up in various types of museum: Stuttgart Natural History Museum: Gamification, digital provenance research; Centre for Art and Media Technology (ZKM) Karlsruhe: Chatbot exhibit guide; TECHNOSEUM Mannheim: interactive films set up as exhibition guides; Württemberg State Museum: VR project for a virtual journey back to the Middle Ages; Baden State Museum: interactive project Creative Collections, visualising 500 objects
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Total funding of EU3.9 million (2017 to 2020); approx. EU390,000 (2017); approx. EU200,000 (2018); approx. EU1.4 million (2019); approx.EU1.9 million (2020)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
YES
If yes, what are the main conclusions/recommendations?: 

The first funding period from 2017 to 2018 with a budget of approx. EU600,000 received a positive evaluation (museums were making significant progress and programmes were well received; programme running from 2018 onwards was extended to 2020 with a budget increase to over EU3 million)

Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
MFG Media and Film Society Baden-Württemberg
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Name of partner: 
Centre for Art and Media Technology (ZKM) Karlsruhe
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Name of partner: 
Baden-Württemberg State Museums
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Museum 4.0 (museum4punkt0), since 2016

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Stiftung Preussischer Kulturbesitz (Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation)
Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Developing concepts for digital curation and digital content dissemination; using new dissemination methods to directly and immediately shape interaction with museum audiences Target groups: Museum audiences from seven cultural institutions in Germany selected as examples Expected results: Facilitating interdisciplinary and inter-regional cooperation between museums to develop digital offerings and dissemination methods; offering new ways of learning, experiencing and interacting with museums; testing pilot educational and digital content in different kinds of museums, such as museums for natural history, technology, migration, folk customs/intangible cultural heritage, art and cultural history
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Scenarios for implementing modern technology including virtual reality, augmented reality and 3D modelling tested through six sub-projects plans made to provide easy access to example projects by gradually putting the methods and materials/prototypes developed as part of the initiative online from 2020; findings discussed and common questions on data analysis, operating concepts, dissemination, visitor statistics and technical standards addressed
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

EU15 million

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
National Museums in Berlin
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
German Emigration Centre (Deutsches Auswandererhaus)
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Deutsches Museum
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Museums of Swabian-Alemannic Fastnacht
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Senckenberg Museum of Natural History Görlitz
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Berlin Palace – Humboldtforum Foundation
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Totally Digital! Reading and storytelling with digital content (Total Digital! Lesen und erzählen mit digitalen Inhalten), 2018 to 2022

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
German Library Association within the framework of Culture is Strength. Education Alliances. (Kultur macht stark. Bündnisse für Bildung)
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Providing children and young people who have limited access to education additional opportunities for education and developing and strengthening their ability to express themselves with and through digital media Target groups: Children and young people who face structural barriers to education Expected results: Improving capabilities for communication through digital media; improving educational opportunities by facilitating access to culture and art; creating lasting connections between institutions and actors on the ground
Does it specifically target young people?: 
YES
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
The aim is to reach over 5000 children through approx. 300 projects from 2018 to 2022; 20% of this number achieved up to and including October 2019; partner institutions active in the social field are particularly well-placed to engage children from less advantaged social and economic backgrounds and to raise their awareness of and enthusiasm for culture
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

EU5 million (2018 to 2022), EU1 million annually

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
German Library Association
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

ZDF Digital Culture Room (ZDF Kulturraum Digital), since 2019

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen (ZDF; public-service television broadcaster)
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Promoting digital creativity and skills; supporting and promoting the process of digitising society through culture; jointly shaping the process of digitisation as a means of strengthening the fundamental values of a free and democratic order; promoting interactive creativity and the use of diverse cultural content Target groups: The general public, cultural institutes, museums, theatres and opera houses, cultural professionals from all artistic and cultural fields Expected results: Using digital means to connect cultural professionals from cultural institutions, museums, theatres and opera houses, cabaret, cinemas, literature, visual arts and design; making a range of cultural content available digitally for everyone at any time
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Cooperation undertaken with 46 institutional cultural partners from art, theatre, music and literature; six high-profile art collections have been digitally processed (https://geheimnis-der-bilder.zdf.de/), 10 art exhibitions can now be experienced virtually (https://digitalekunsthalle.zdf.de/index.html); over 250 video book reviews made available on the literary website YourBook (DeinBuch, https://dein-buch.zdf.de/), providing a fun way to discover books
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Funded from broadcasting licence fees paid by the public

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
YES
If yes, what are the main conclusions/recommendations?: 

First evaluation process has been running since late 2019 and is expected to be concluded in spring 2020

Aligning the value-added tax on digital publications with that levied on print media, 2019

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Federal Government
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Facilitating independent opinion forming through a diverse press landscape that should be able to offer high-quality content regardless of delivery channel; increasing diversity in the press and publishing landscape Target groups: Publishing houses; digital and print press; consumers Expected results: Whether in analogue or digital form, books, newspapers and magazines will be subject to the same tax rates
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Value-added tax of 19% currently levied on digital publications such as newspapers, eBooks, etc. to be reduced to 7% to equate to the reduced value-added tax levied on press and print products
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Federal Ministry of Finance
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Partnering with Civil Society

Professional organizations and/or trade unions representing artists and/or cultural professionals in the following sectors exist in your country (i.e. federation of musicians, publishers unions, etc.): 
Cinema/Audiovisual arts
Design
Media Arts
Music
Publishing
Visual Arts
Performing Arts
Public funding schemes supporting CSOs involvement in promoting the diversity of cultural expressions exist: 
YES
Training and mentoring opportunities were organized or supported by public authorities during the last 4 years to build skills on communication, advocacy and/or fundraising of civil society organizations involved in the promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions: 
YES
Dialogue mechanisms between public authorities and CSOs for cultural policy making and/or monitoring have been implemented during the last 4 years (meetings, working groups, etc.): 
YES
If YES, please provide up to 2 examples: 
Revision of copyright law to implement the EU directives on copyright law, amended in April 2019, 2019 to 2021: Public consultation on the implementation of the two copyright directives (EU) 2019/790 (DSM-RL) and (EU) 2019/789 (Online SatCab-RL) of 17 April 2019; enabled public and comprehensive comments from stakeholders and institutions (see QPR 2020, Chapter 1.4.)
Re/Shaping Cultural Policies 2020: Expert Consultation on Gender Equality in Cultural Policy, 2019: International expert consultation with 20 participants from institutions with significant expertise; policy paper published in the form of a brochure (English/German) with policy recommendations; key demands: (mandatory) gender training and education on gender issues for all media and cultural workers; documentation of examples of collective artistic and creative power and role models; development of a prototype for gender-specific transformative cultural policy that strengthens the diversity of artistic forms of expression; closer examination of a "seal" mechanism for granting public subsidies (see QPR 2020, Chapter 4.1.5.)
Policies and measures promoting the diversity of cultural expressions have been elaborated in consultation with CSOs during the last 4 years: 
YES
Relevant Policies and Measures: 

Pilot project on promoting the socio-cultural dimension in Hesse, 2016 to 2020

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Land Hesse working group on cultural initiatives and socio-cultural centres (LAKS, (Landesarbeitsgemeinschaft der Kulturinitiativen und soziokulturellen Zentren in Hessen e.V.)
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Creating and professionally developing stable structures for cultural diversity in the socio-cultural landscape of Hesse; strengthening civil society engagement Target groups: Socio-cultural centres; non-governmental organisations; civil society beneficiaries Expected results: Stabilising and strengthening specific activities and effects related to socio-cultural work in terms of cultural diversity, participation in culture and cultural education, regardless of age, background, gender or income; using funding in an efficient and effective manner; supporting structures all year round (“from project to structure”); making funding arrangements more transparent
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
LAKS set up as a contact point for actors submitting applications for funding: advice, information, eligibility assessments; simplified management and award of funding; structural funding has made it easier for cultural operators to plan beyond project funding for cultural operators
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Approx. EU3 million (2016 to 2020)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
YES
If yes, what are the main conclusions/recommendations?: 

Nationwide one-off and innovative pilot project brought a new, nationwide awareness of the socio-cultural scene and professional associations and boosted their reputation; the confidence and future prospects of many actors has been significantly increased; funding has been significantly increased (double the level of 2014); the pilot project relieved the burden on Land Hesse LAKS and participating stakeholders

Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Ministry of Science and the Arts, Land Hesse
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

TRAFO – Models for Culture in Transformation. An initiative of the German Federal Cultural Foundation, 2013 to 2023

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Office of Applied Culture and Mediation (Büro für angewandte Kultur und Vermittlung (bakv gUG))
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Strengthening and developing cultural institutions in rural areas as active regional stakeholders, thereby making a range of cultural forms of expression available to the region’s population Target groups: Regional cultural institutions such as museums, theatres, libraries, cultural centres, music schools, literature venues, districts; municipalities and cultural operators such as initiatives, artists’ platforms Expected results: Getting participating cultural institutions interested in and open to new tasks and further developing them into cultural anchor points in their respective regions; highlighting the importance of art and culture as a means of transforming public perceptions; sustainably strengthening cultural-policy structures in municipalities and districts
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Six projects in four regions received support from 2015 to 2020; 18 regions received advice and support in developing their own transformation plans in 2018 and 2019
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

EU24.1 million (2015 to 2023)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
YES
If yes, what are the main conclusions/recommendations?: 

Initial results of evaluations are expected in summer 2020; five additional regions are being supported in the second project phase from 2020 to 2023

Freedom. Diversity. Innovation. Action points on monitoring the implementation of the 2005 UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions in and by Germany from 2017 to 2020

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Federal Coalition for Cultural Diversity
German Commission for UNESCO
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Monitoring the implementation of the 2005 UNESCO Convention in and by Germany towards forward-looking cultural policy; structured development and tracking with relevant civil society actors Target groups: Civil society actors in the art, cultural and creative sectors; the German Commission for UNESCO expert committee on culture and communication and the advisory board on ‘Diversity of Cultural Expressions’ as well as members of the Federal Coalition for Cultural Diversity Expected results: Developing an action plan for 2017 to 2020 based on the assessment of the second German 2016 Quadrennial Periodic Report through four months of consultations; developing and adhering to the focus areas for the implementation of the Convention for the reporting period and beyond
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
In 2016, the following focuses were established for future work to achieve the Convention’s aims: media and digital technologies, appraisal of opportunities for civil society actors to participate in decision-making processes related to cultural matters, focus on Agenda 2030, challenges for cultural policy posed by international trade policy; ways in which concepts of preferential measures are communicated improved and changed, esp. through the Fair Culture initiative with partners, active contribution made to the process on Culture in EU External Relations
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Civil society consultation 2018 to 2020 within the framework of drafting the Third German Quadrennial Periodic Report

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
German Commission for UNESCO
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Inviting civil society actors relevant to and active in pursuing the Convention’s aims to participate in compiling the Third Quadrennial Periodic Report; including civil society expertise as part of quality control of the draft report Target groups: Civil society actors in the art, cultural and creative sectors; the German Commission for UNESCO expert committee on culture and communication and the advisory board on ‘Diversity of Cultural Expressions’ as well as members of the Federal Coalition for Cultural Diversity Expected results: Soliciting an initial range of views on the ‘Top Ten’ measures in 2018; collecting and compiling civil society contributions for the 2016–2019 reporting period; providing comments (electronically) for quality control on the first draft of the third report in winter 2019/2020 and reviewing the draft at an expert consultation day; identifying key challenges for the cultural and creative sectors in the next four years (2020 to 2023)
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Civil society actors actively involved in drafting the Third Quadrennial Periodic Report through important contributions; key challenges to cultural policy in coming years identified
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Goal 2 - Achieve a Balanced Flow of Cultural Goods and Services and Increase the Mobility of Artists and Cultural Professionals

Mobility of Artists and Cultural Professionals

Please indicate if the following policies and measures exist in your country: 
Policies and measures supporting the outward mobility of artists and cultural professionals (e.g. export offices, support for participation in international cultural markets for cultural professionals, etc.)
Specific visa policies or other cross border measures supporting the inward mobility of foreign artists and cultural professionals in your country (e.g. simplified visa procedures, reduced fees for visas, visas for longer durations)
Work permit regulations supporting the inward mobility of foreign artists and cultural professionals in your country (e.g. double taxation avoidance agreements, special work permits and health insurance, subsidies to cover living expenses, etc.)
Please indicate if the following operational programmes have been developed or supported/funded by public authorities during the last 4 years: 
Information resources or training services providing practical guidance to facilitate the mobility of cultural professionals (e.g. Internet platforms)
Infrastructure (e.g. arts residencies, cultural institutes, etc.) having a mandate to promote the diversity of cultural expressions and hosting a large number of foreign artists, notably from developing countries
Major cultural events (e.g. cultural seasons, festivals, cultural industries markets, etc.) having a mandate to promote the diversity of cultural expressions and hosting a large number of foreign artists, notably from developing countries
Please indicate if the following mobility funds (e.g. scholarships, travel grants, etc.) have been managed or supported by public authorities during the last 4 years: 
Public funds supporting the outward mobility of national or resident artists and other cultural professionals
Public funds supporting the inward mobility of foreign artists and other cultural professionals, notably from developing countries
Public funds specifically supporting the mobility of artists and other cultural professionals from or between developing countries, including through North-South-South and South-South cooperation
Relevant Policies and Measures: 

Residency programmes and setting up a national working group, since 2018

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Goethe-Institut e.V.
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Promoting intercultural exchange between cultural professionals and synergies between numerous residency programmes through sustainable networks and cooperation Target groups: Artists and cultural professionals; translators; academics Expected results: Enabling cultural professionals to pursue projects free from economic pressures and to make and build lasting working relationships; facilitating personal encounters between cultural professionals and in certain cases also public presentations; sharing artistic and academic inspiration in a lasting manner and across borders
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
1. Approx. 200 residencies in 70 programmes per year run by the Goethe-Institut and its cultural partners abroad; in 2016–2019 reporting period: number of programmes increased from 52 to 74 and programme expenditure increased by approx. 20%, to almost €4 million; Goethe-Institut in Salvador de Bahia converted into a residence and opened in 2016; publications, tours and international co-productions arisen as a result of scholarships and as a direct expression of and reference to residencies; scholarship holders’ networks expanded. Providing responsible support for artist residencies often requires psychosocial skills. This element must be incorporated into policy and reflected in subsidy programmes in future.
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Supported by federal funding: budget of EU2.6 million (2015); EU2.9 million (2016); EU3.3 million (2017); EU3.8 million (2018); approx. EU4 million (2019)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
working group of the German international residency programme (ADIR)
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)

Touring Artists: information and advisory services – expanded since 2018/2019

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
International Society of Fine Arts IGBK
Federal Republic of Germany’s centre of the International Theatre Institute (ITI)
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Preparing information on inward and outward mobility and making it available to creative artists and cultural professionals Target groups: Artists; creative professionals and event organisers; previous focus on visual and performing arts sectors; since 2018/2019 provision of initial information for the music industry; expanded to cultural professionals from Turkey; artists and cultural professionals forced to leave their countries of origin and come to Germany for political reasons Expected results: Maintaining and expanding the range of information on visual and performing arts available online; since 2018/2019: providing music sector actors with initial information on inward and outward mobility, administrative issues and living circumstances for cultural professionals in Germany; supporting creative and cultural professionals who have had to leave their countries of origin due to the political situation and now live in Germany through information available online and in-person advice; informing creative and cultural professionals from Turkey present in Germany of the professional avenues available
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
From 2018/2019: more in-depth information provided to cultural professionals from Turkey who come to Germany on a temporary basis for work or stay in the Federal Republic for longer periods; information and advice provided to creative and cultural professionals who have had to leave their countries of origin due to the political situation and now live in Germany; in each case event organisers in Germany actively addressed on this issue; in 2018, approx. 2500 visitors per month registered on the touring artists online portal; 377 qualified, personal consultations held; approx. 25 workshops and presentations carried out annually; three newsletters published per year; since 2018/2019 initial expansion in the music sector
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media: EU75,000 (2016); EU91,270 (2017); EU73,770 (2018); EU83,500 (2019); in 2018 and 2019 additional project funding from the Senate Department for Culture and Europe of Land Berlin within the framework of the project "Berlin - Open to the World" (Weltoffenes Berlin): EU24,000 (2018); EU36,000 (2019)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
European Music Council
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Name of partner: 
University of the Arts
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
SMartDe network for creative artists
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)

UNESCO City of Literature Heidelberg’s Poetry Expedition, since 2016

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Cultural Office of the City of Heidelberg
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Fostering mobility and direct exchange of and between international lyricists; creating opportunities for lasting, longer-term, international working relationships Target groups: Lyricists from UNESCO Cities of Literature around the world Expected results: Stimulating joint translation projects; pilot project of UNESCO City of Literature Heidelberg to be taken up and jointly advanced by other UNESCO Cities of Literature
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
2016: Poetry Expedition pilot project from Heidelberg to Prague; 2018: Poetry Expedition to Granada, Spain; productive exchange among participants; at least five poems written by each lyricist translated within a week; first eBook featuring the results of the Poetry Expedition published in 2018
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Municipal budgets for cooperation within the UNESCO Creative Cities Network; EU20,000 for each Expedition covering 50% of Expedition costs

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Prague state library
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Goethe-Institut e.V.
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Centro Federico García Lorca Granada
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)

NIPKOW Programme, founded in 1998, 2016 conceptual redesign to promote excellence

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
NIPKOW Programme
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Promoting inter-cultural exchange between selected filmmakers; fostering international cooperation through lasting networks in this field Target groups: International producers, directors, authors, creative professionals from all areas of digital audiovisual media; the production and distribution sectors Expected results: Initiating scholarship programmes for further training for international film and media professionals; creating space for cultural creation free from economic pressure; supporting and enabling international co-productions and global distribution; guaranteeing individual care through tailored seminars and workshops adapted to the respective professional specialisms and needs of individual scholarship holders
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Steps towards an international career as filmmaker facilitated; lasting working relationships made and built; artistic and academic inspiration exchanged in a lasting manner and across borders; broad and effective network of professionals and institutions such as production, festivals and film markets created in countries throughout Europe; in the 2016–2019 reporting period: since 2018, structural reorientation as an excellency support programme; care and mentoring for scholarship holders strongly intensified; 13–17 scholars selected annually, in most cases from approx. 90 applicants
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media, Medienboard Berlin-Brandenburg,
Eurimages: EU115,500 annually

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Berlinale World Cinema Fund, greater focus on Africa, since 2016

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Berlin International Film Festival (Berlinale) business division of Kulturveranstaltungen des Bundes in Berlin GmbH (KBB)
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Música
Las artes escénicas
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Producing and distributing films from the World Cinema Fund regions of Latin America, Central America, the Caribbean, Africa, the Near East, West Asia, Central Asia, Southeast Asia and the Caucasus as well as Bangladesh, Nepal, Mongolia and Sri Lanka; strengthening film industries and film culture with and from Africa in particular Target groups: Film creators and film producers in Germany, Europe, regions and countries eligible for World Cinema Fund support, in the case of the World Cinema Fund Africa (WCF Africa) with a special focus on partners from sub-Saharan Africa Expected results: Developing, producing and distributing feature films from countries and regions with rudimentary film industries or film industries affected by crises; contributing to a new cultural geography of innovative feature films; providing sustainable support to international cooperation and democratisation of cooperation and co-distribution strategies; strengthening measures to facilitate ambitious and innovative film projects by intensifying promotion strategies in Africa; further developing the commercial potential of African films; facilitating knowledge transfer between Africa and Europe
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
New measures in 2016–2019 reporting period: since 2016, engagement significantly intensified with help from the Federal Foreign Office; first-time funding of €160,000 for co-productions by producers from Germany and sub-Saharan Africa; number of submissions of African projects significantly increased; since 2016, 13 projects supported by WCF Africa; important film successes, including: “Rafiki” (Kenya/South Africa/Germany), “A Kasha” (Sudan/South Africa/Germany), “Sew the Winter to my Skin” (South Africa/Germany), “You Will Die at Twenty” (Sudan/Egypt/Germany/Norway/France), “No Gold for Kalsaka” (Burkina Faso/Germany); in total, 222 projects (of 3793 submissions) supported (2004 to 2019)
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

German Federal Cultural Foundation EU1.4 million (2016 to 2019); Federal Foreign Office EU584,000 (2016 to 2019); Creative Europe Media (EU programme) approx. EU853,000 (2016 to 2019)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

TURN, cooperation with Africa fund, 2012 to 2021

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
German Federal Cultural Foundation
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Música
Las artes escénicas
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Promoting artistic debate between German and African partners on an equal footing; building sustainable networks and cooperation Target groups: Cultural institutions and artists in Germany and African countries Expected results: Building the profile of German cultural institutions and actors around new themes, perspectives and ways of working; promoting multidisciplinary artistic exchange; critically analysing outdated perceptions of the African continent; refining expert views on the artistic positions of the Global South
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
New in the 2016–2019 reporting period: significant budget increase of approx. €5.3 million (2012 to 2015) to approx. €7.9 million (2015 to 2021); since 2012, 101 projects and research initiatives in 12 countries with cooperation partners from 30 African states supported through TURN; effective impetus created on improving perceptions of the dynamic momentum of the globally oriented scene in Africa; creations made with theatre producers, choreographers, artists, directors, musicians, publicists; images of Africa critically analysed and corrected; new international prospects created
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Approx. EU7.8 million (2016 to 2021); in total approx. EU14.2 million (2012 to 2021)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
German Federal Cultural Foundation
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Flow of Cultural Goods and Services

Export strategies or measures to support the distribution of cultural goods and services outside your country exist for the following cultural domains: 
Cinema/Audiovisual arts
Design
Media Arts
Music
Publishing
Visual Arts
Performing Arts
Cultural management
Your country has granted or benefited from preferential treatment* to support a balanced exchange of cultural goods and services in the last 4 years: 
YES, I have granted preferential treatment
If YES, please provide up to 2 examples: 
In the context of the common trade policy, responsibility for negotiating and concluding trade and investment agreements lies with the EU. Germany participates in consultations on such negotiations and in decision-making on the conclusion of such agreements via the Council of the EU. The EU has concluded numerous free trade agreements. As an innovative measure in trade law, a specific “protocol on cultural cooperation” has been introduced to certain important agreements to reflect the aims of the UNESCO Convention. Since 2017, a UNESCO Policy & Research Paper has been available entitled ‘Culture in Treaties and Agreements. Implementing the 2005 Convention in Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements’, authored by Véronique Guèvrement and Ivana Otašević, (cf. p. 14, p. 42, p. 46, p. 49 on the EU agreements, UNESCO Paris 2017). In addition, on a national level, two exemplary initiatives and programmes are highlighted for the purpose of this platform: 1) Berlinale World Cinema Fund: Strengthening the film industry and film culture, especially with and from Africa; Main aims: Producing and distributing films from the World Cinema Fund regions of Latin America, Central America, the Caribbean, Africa, the Near East, West Asia, Central Asia, Southeast Asia and the Caucasus as well as Bangladesh, Nepal, Mongolia and Sri Lanka; strengthening film industries and film culture with and from Africa in particular.
In the context of the common trade policy, responsibility for negotiating and concluding trade and investment agreements lies with the EU. Germany participates in consultations on such negotiations and in decision-making on the conclusion of such agreements via the Council of the EU. The EU has concluded numerous free trade agreements. As an innovative measure in trade law, a specific “protocol on cultural cooperation” has been introduced to certain important agreements to reflect the aims of the UNESCO Convention. Since 2017, a UNESCO Policy & Research Paper has been available entitled ‘Culture in Treaties and Agreements. Implementing the 2005 Convention in Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements’, authored by Véronique Guèvrement and Ivana Otašević, (cf. p. 14, p. 42, p. 46, p. 49 on the EU agreements, UNESCO Paris 2017). In addition, on a national level, two exemplary initiatives and programmes are highlighted for the purpose of this platform: 2) Frankfurt Book Fair, invitation programme for publishers; Main aims: (a) Actively raising awareness among important stakeholders of the concept of preferential treatment in line with the 2005 UNESCO Convention; researching good practice examples from Germany and abroad and making them visible; (b) Developing the concept of Fair Culture as a driver for German cultural policy and development cooperation, as well as at European and international level, in order to strongly promote a balanced flow of cultural goods and services as well as fair working conditions for artists and cultural professionals
Your country has provided or benefited in the last 4 years from Aid for Trade support, a form of Official Development Assistance (ODA), that helped to build capacities to formulate trade policies, participate in negotiating and implementing agreements that provide a special status to cultural goods and services: 
YES, I have provided Aid for Trade support
If YES, please provide up to 2 examples: 
In the context of the common trade policy, responsibility for negotiating and concluding trade and investment agreements lies primarily with the EU. Germany participates in consultations on such negotiations and in decision-making on the conclusion of such agreements via the Council of the EU. Germany has, however, concluded bilateral agreements favoring cooperation in the culture sector. For the above-mentioned purposes, Germany has negotiated a bilateral cultural agreement with the Republic of Albania, which entered into force in 2019, aiming at, among other things, stabilizing and supporting cooperation between both countries and providing mutual support for guest performances by artists and ensembles.
In the context of the common trade policy, responsibility for negotiating and concluding trade and investment agreements lies primarily with the EU. Germany participates in consultations on such negotiations and in decision-making on the conclusion of such agreements via the Council of the EU. In 2018, the German Commission for UNESCO successfully launched the project initiative “Fair Trade for Culture – Fair Culture”, which is currently revised and will run until 2025. Its aim is to develop the concept of Fair Culture as a driver cultural policy and development cooperation in Germany as well as on a European and international level in order to promote a balanced flow of cultural goods and services as well as fair working conditions for artists and cultural professionals.
Value of direct foreign investment in creative and cultural industries (in USD): 
732,896,500USD
2017
Relevant Policies and Measures: 

Project initiative “Fair Trade for Culture – Fair Culture”, 2018 to 2020 and 2019 to 2025

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
German Commission for UNESCO
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: (a) Actively raising awareness among important stakeholders of the concept of preferential treatment in line with the 2005 UNESCO Convention; researching good practice examples from Germany and abroad and making them visible (b) Developing the concept of Fair Culture as a driver for German cultural policy and development cooperation, as well as at European and international level, in order to strongly promote a balanced flow of cultural goods and services as well as fair working conditions for artists and cultural professionals Target groups: Domestic and international stakeholders and experts; decision-makers involved in Fair Trade in policymaking, the cultural sector, academia, business and civil society; artists, cultural professionals and producers around the world, with a focus on the Global South Expected results: Identifying and making visible good examples from practice (incl. joint study with the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ); developing a “60 minutes for Fair Culture” format for film, books and music; creating a platform for networking and cooperation between international actors from the Fair Trade movement and the cultural and creative sectors; in the medium term: producing an analysis of the cultural value chain in the digital context with consideration for Fair Culture and developing recommendations for action
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Five expert discussions and workshops held at the national and international level with experts from policymaking, civil society, business and academia, including within the framework of the 12th session of the Intergovernmental Committee of the 2005 Convention in Paris (2018), with the Berlinale Talents initiative (2019), at the Frankfurt Buchmesse book fair (2019) and the WOMEX music fair in Tampere, Finland, under the auspices of the Finnish Presidency of the Council of the EU in 2019; results of the expert discussions and workshops documented in policy papers by international experts Baltà Portolés and Dr Keith Nurse on the German Commission for UNESCO’s website; BMZ-funded study designed with international partners to analyse the cultural value chain from a Fair Culture perspective to clarify options for action (cf. Section 3.2.1.)
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Mannheim UNESCO City of Music
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Berlinale Talents
Type of entity: 
Private Sector
Name of partner: 
Frankfurter Buchmesse
Type of entity: 
Private Sector
Name of partner: 
WOMEX
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Name of partner: 
Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Institute of Culture and Media Management, Hamburg University of Music and Theatre (HfMT)
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
UNESCO Chair on the Diversity of Cultural Expressions at Laval University, Canada
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development

Tratados y acuerdos

Multilateral or bilateral trade and/or investment agreements providing a special status to cultural goods and/or services have been signed during the last 4 years or are under negociation: 
YES
Multilateral or bilateral agreements including specific provisions providing a special status to cultural goods and services and digital products in the field of e-commerce have been signed during the last 4 years or are under negotiation: 
UNDER NEGOTIATION
Multilateral or bilateral agreements, declarations and/or strategies on relevant policy issues for the diversity of cultural expressions (e.g. education, digital, intellectual property, sustainable development, gender equality, etc.) signed or amended to take into account the objectives or principles of the Convention during the last 4 years: 
YES
Relevant Policies and Measures: 

Meetings of the joint EU-Korea Cultural Cooperation Committee on the basis of the EU-Korea Protocol on Cultural Cooperation adopted in 2015 within the framework of the 2010 free trade agreement

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
14 of the 28 EU member states, including Germany
European Commission
Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism of the Republic of Korea
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Strengthening cultural diversity through an exchange of cultural activities, goods and services that is easier, more intense and more stable for both sides – Korea and the EU – including in the growing audiovisual sector as well as through improved framework conditions The Protocol on Cultural Cooperation in the free trade agreement (FTA) between the European Union and its member states on one side and the Republic of Korea on the other covers the following priorities: strengthening cultural diversity through support for audiovisual works; expanding the reach of European films in Korea and Korean films to an EU audience and growing their respective market shares; facilitating the exchange of cultural activities, goods and services, including in the audiovisual sector, and improving the conditions of such exchange; creating an environment conducive to international co-productions between European and Korean partners, in particular through exchange of information, market access and further training, networking days and workshops. The free trade agreement was concluded in 2010 and entered into force in 2011. The accompanying Protocol on Cultural Cooperation covers the cultural and creative industries and co-productions in the audiovisual sector and has been in force since 2015. Co-production agreements have been adopted for the periods 2011 to 2014, 2014 to 2017 and currently for 2017 to 2020. Target groups: European and international – here: Korean – co-production partners in the audiovisual sector and further fields of the culture and creative industries Expected results: Expanding the reach of European films in Korea and Korean films to an EU audience and growing their respective market shares; strengthening artistic presence from Korea and Europe through residency programmes and important fairs; compiling joint statistical studies on the fields of the cultural and creative industries, in particular on virtual reality and animation
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Four sessions held from 2016–2019 on the basis of the protocol adopted in 2015; Korean artists participated in projects associated with the EU Creative Europe programme and stage events and festivals in Europe, in part with the help of Korean support; European artists participated in the annual Performing Arts Market in Seoul, in 2018 five workshops held with the European Union as guest of honour, one EU music night and speed dating programmes In the field of audiovisual co-productions primarily bilateral projects carried out thus far. The extension of the protocol until 2023 was decided in 2020.
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

For co-productions, producers are obliged to make a contribution of their own of 10% of the total budget of the production; this is often covered by national film funding

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
YES
If yes, what are the main conclusions/recommendations?: 

Measures are based on studies and data from the European Audiovisual Observatory which show that a larger audience was reached through co-productions; from 2016 to 2017, films produced in the EU reached a market share of 5% of Korean cinema audiences and 20% of releases; the total number of visitors to Korean cinemas has risen by 41% since 2011; Korean films achieved an EU market share of 1% of audiences and 2% of releases

Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
EU and Republic of Korea advisory groups on audiovisual media
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Korean Arts Council
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Agreement between the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany and the Government of the Republic of Albania on Cultural Cooperation of 8 December 2015, entered into force on 25 March 2019

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Government of the Federal Republic of Germany
Government of the Republic of Albania
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Deepening mutual understanding of both countries’ cultures; further developing cultural and artistic cooperation Target groups: Artists and cultural professionals and the general public in both countries Expected results: Mutually broadening knowledge of art and literature in both countries; facilitating and providing mutual support for guest performances by artists and ensembles from both countries; facilitating events by and with representatives of different areas of cultural life, in particular literature, music, visual and performing arts; stabilising and supporting cooperation and experience-sharing
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Agreement between the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany and the Government of the Republic of Chile on Co-productions of Films of 10 October 2018

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Government of the Federal Republic of Germany
Government of the Republic of Chile
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Enriching cinematography in both countries Target groups: German and Chilean co-production partners in the audiovisual sector Expected results: Intensifying exchange and cooperation between filmmakers of both countries; facilitating access to the markets involved in co-production, including by recognising ‘national’ films; improving access to funding, including through national treatment of co-productions; increasing the number of German-Chilean co-productions; increasing the reach and market share of the partner country’s films domestically
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Network meetings between German and Chilean producers held at the 2020 Berlinale; ratification process in Chile not yet completed
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Agreement between the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany and the Government of the Portuguese Republic on Relations in the Field of Film of 29 April 1988, entered into force on 21 March 2016

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Government of the Federal Republic of Germany
Government of the Portuguese Republic
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Promoting cultural exchange through co-productions Target groups: German and Portuguese co-production partners in the audiovisual sector Expected results: Revising existing co-production agreement with Portugal; making it simpler to initiate joint feature film projects; increasing the number of German-Portuguese co-productions; increasing the reach and market share of the partner country’s films domestically; promoting exchange and cooperation between filmmakers of both countries
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Co-production meeting for German and Portuguese producers held in 2017 in Lisbon – facilitated networking, exchange on partner countries’ markets and new film projects aimed at an international audience; 2nd German-Portuguese co-production meeting held on 28 and 29 June 2019 within the framework of the Munich International Film Festival: themes of the event organised by the German Federal Film Board (FFA) and its Portuguese counterpart Instituto do Cinema e do Audiovisual ICA included: presenting national and regional film support measures and production conditions of joint cooperation and German-Portuguese co-production successes achieved thus far
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Goal 3 - Integrate Culture in Sustainable Development Frameworks

National Sustainable Development Policies & Plans

National sustainable development plans and strategies recognize the strategic role of: 
Culture (in general)
Creativity and innovation
Cultural and creative industries
Please rate from 1 to 4 the type of outcomes expected by the inclusion of culture in national sustainable development plans and strategies 1 most often expected outcome 4 least expected outcome): 
-
Public cultural bodies and agencies responsible for culture or creative industries are involved in the design and implementation of sustainable development policies and plans (i.e. participate in coordination mechanisms such as joint planning committees): 
YES
Cultural industry-led regeneration initiatives and projects at the regional, urban and/or rural levels have been implemented in the last 4 years: 
YES
Policies and measures facilitate participation in cultural life and access to diverse cultural facilities and expressions, notably addressing the needs of disadvantaged or vulnerable groups (e.g. via reduced entrance fees; audience development, arts education and audiences awareness-raising): 
YES
Latest data on cultural participation rates by socio demographic variables (sex/age groups/rural- urban/income levels/education levels): 
The last nationwide survey in this area was conducted by the 9th Kulturbarometer 2011, carried out by the Center for Cultural Research in cooperation with the German Orchestra Association. No updated figures are available for the reporting period 2016 to 2019. According to the 2019 cultural-statistics report by EUROSTAT, in 2015 an average of 73.3% of all Germans "last year" took part in a cultural activity such as going to the cinema, live performances or visiting cultural sites. Depending on the level of education, participation varies between 60% (low) and 83% (high). In 2015, 56.1% of Germans were engaged in an artistic activity such as making music, with 29.7% doing so weekly. An average of 7% of Germans stated that they had not participated or been active in cultural activities at all, indicating that they were not interested in cultural and artistic activities and the associated offerings. (See QPR 2020, Annexes)
Relevant Policies and Measures: 

German National Sustainable Development Strategy (National Sustainability Strategy), revised version of 2017

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Federal Government
State Secretaries’ Committee for Sustainable Development
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Implementing Germany’s National Sustainable Development Strategy with the involvement of cultural and civil society actors on the basis of the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda; strengthening societal processes for a shift towards sustainable development in Germany Target groups: Civil society and cultural actors; the general public; companies; institutions; educational facilities; decision-makers in government and business Expected results: Understanding culture as a driver of change towards sustainable development; strengthening artistic engagement with the spaces where culture and nature, and people and the environment meet; holding a European sustainability conference in 2020 during Germany’s Presidency of the Council of the EU and within the framework of the European Sustainable Development Networks (ESDN)
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Concept for a “culture of sustainability” integrated into the 2017 update of Germany’s National Sustainable Development Strategy; approaches from the creative industry used to support societal processes and developments; 2030 Agenda presented as proof of successful multilateralism
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Creation of the Culture and Societal Change action area by the German Council for Sustainable Development, 2017

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
German Council for Sustainable Development (RNE)
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Providing policy advice in the area of sustainable development through the prism of culture and societal change; connecting different sectors and areas of life to bring about a longer-term societal shift towards sustainable development Target groups: Decision-makers in government and industry; cultural actors Expected results: Providing support via the Sustainability Culture Fund for transformative projects about sustainability culture; using artistic projects to reassess established routines and thereby make progress in societal negotiation mechanisms and change
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Sustainability Culture Fund created in 2017 for a period of three years (2018 to 2020); ideas competitions launched for different areas of everyday life, such as food, mobility and building; 12 projects funded on the topic of “food culture and sustainability” and 11 projects on the topic of “fashion culture, textiles and sustainability”
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

EU7.5 million

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Federal Chancellery
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
German Bundestag
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Green Shooting Card (Grüner Drehpass) for film production, introduced in 2012, available throughout Germany since 2016

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Filmförderung Hamburg Schleswig-Holstein
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Encouraging filmmakers to adopt environmental measures; expanding pilot projects from the Land level to the national level Target groups: The film sector in the Länder of Hamburg and Schleswig-Holstein; since 2016: the film sector throughout Germany Expected results: Encouraging filmmakers to adopt environmentally friendly measures (for filming); raising national awareness of the Land initiative; preparing to anchor the initiative in regulations at the European level
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Over 155 environmental certificates awarded since 2012 to environmentally conscious film and television productions in or from Hamburg and Schleswig-Holstein that demonstrably acted in a sustainable manner in at least four of the following areas: production design, catering, production office, transport/mobility, lighting/technology and compiling a CO2 balance sheet; workshops and individual consultations held about environmentally friendly measures in the areas of lighting, energy, transport or set design; efforts made to achieve nationwide adoption of the requirements in German Federal Film Board guidelines in 2020
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Annual budget of EU10,000 (2016 to 2019)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Hamburg Senate
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Land Government of Schleswig-Holstein
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Filmförderung Hamburg Schleswig-Holstein
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Measures for environmentally sustainable film production within the context of national film funding

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media
Cultural domains covered by the policy/measure: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Raising awareness of environmentally friendly production and distribution in the film industry; making the film industry more sustainable Target groups: The film sector Expected results: Establishing first incentives to encourage filmmakers to adopt environmentally friendly, sustainable measures in film and television production
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Declarations of commitment made within the framework of the German Federal Film Fund (DFFF); costs for sustainability consultants recognised in all federal funding regulations
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Federal Chancellery
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

International Cooperation for Sustainable Development

Your country has contributed to or benefited from the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) during the last 4 years: 
YES, my country has contributed to the IFCD
Development cooperation strategies, including South-South cooperation strategies, recognize the strategic role of creativity and diverse cultural expressions: 
YES
If YES, please provide the name(s) of the strategy and year(s) of adoption: 
Global project culture and creative industries in six pilot countries in Africa and Middle East, 2018 to 2020
Your country manages multi- and/or bilateral technical assistance and capacity building cooperation programmes supporting: 
Cultural policy development and implementation in developing countries
Medium, small or micro-enterprise development of creative industries and markets in developing countries
Artists and cultural professionals in developing countries
Value of the total national contribution to the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (in USD): 
241,410.00
2020
Relevant Policies and Measures: 

Founding of a division for media, culture, the creative industries and sport within the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2017

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Establishing culture, the creative industries, media and sport as an independent action area within German development cooperation Target groups: Partners (esp. young people and entrepreneurs) in selected countries of the Global South Expected results: Making use of the potential that media, culture, the creative industries and sport have for achieving the goals of the 2030 Agenda, i.e. (inter alia): enabling political participation and good governance through free media; creating more jobs and raising incomes in the future-oriented cultural sector; education, employment, health and integration through sport; developing and establishing new strategic programme priorities, particularly regarding education, training, income and employment potential of young people
Does it specifically target young people?: 
YES
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
General: Division at the Ministry established with three desk officers. Culture/creative industries: Global project “Culture and Creative Industries – Drivers of Development” started in Africa (Senegal, Kenya, South Africa) and the Near East (Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq), to run from 2018 to 2020 (planned continuation till at least 2023; cf. Section 3.2.2.); 2017–2021 pilot project “Culture for Development” with UNESCO to promote the value chain in the music industry in Morocco, funding via BMZ funds-in-trust (see below), expansion to Tunisia planned; study on promoting the creative industries in Africa through Germany development cooperation carried out in collaboration with the Institute of African Studies at the University of Bayreuth; since May 2020: study on “Fair Culture as a contribution to sustainable development” with the German Commission for UNESCO, focusing on sustainable and fair value chains in the cultural and creative industries (incl. options for German development cooperation), cf. Section 2.2. Media: “Future. Market. Film.” initiative started in cooperation with, inter alia, Tom Tykwer (Kenya) and Volker Schlöndorff (Rwanda), to improve training and distribution (incl. high-level events with the Minister and Deutsche Welle on “African Film on the Rise”); market survey of the earnings potential of African film productions on the international market in cooperation with Rushlake Media distribution company
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

EU8 million for the global project by Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH (2018 to 2020); EU905,000 in funds-in-trust transferred to UNESCO (2017 to 2021); studies amounting to approx. EU140,000

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
UNESCO
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
University of Bayreuth
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Rushlake Media
Type of entity: 
Private Sector
Name of partner: 
One Fine Day Films
Type of entity: 
Private Sector
Name of partner: 
European Film Center Babelsberg
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
German Commission for UNESCO
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Global Project Culture and Creative Industries in six pilot countries in Africa and the Near East (Senegal, Kenya, South Africa; Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq), 2018 to 2020

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
Goethe-Institut e.V.
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Enabling better use of the economic and developmental potential of culture the and creative industries in six pilot countries in Africa and the Middle Ease Target groups: Cultural and creative industries in the six project countries – Senegal, Kenya, South Africa, Lebanon, Jordan and Iraq Expected results: Promoting culture and the creative industries as an economic factor (jobs, income) in Senegal, Kenya, South Africa and Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq: e.g. support for creative businesses in the form of business advice; piloting innovative approaches such as crowdfunding and export promotion in the creative sector; supporting and strengthening interest groups and networks in the creative sector; improving framework conditions, particularly in the field of rights management
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
As of April 2020: approx. 100 measures implemented in training and networking, benefitting up to 9000 people directly and up to 25,000 people indirectly; priority areas identified in music, fashion/design, film/animation and creative entrepreneurship in the six project countries in Africa and the Near East (cf. Section 3.2.1.)
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

EU8 million (2018-2020)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Ayada Lab in the five West African countries of Cameroon, Ghana, Nigeria, Senegal, and Côte d’Ivoire, 2017 to 2020

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Goethe-Institut e.V.
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Strengthening private sector structures by promoting young and innovative creative entrepreneurship in West Africa; enabling international cultural exchange between entrepreneurs Target groups: Young, creative entrepreneurs aged between 20 and 35 in five West African countries – Cameroon, Ghana, Nigeria, Senegal and Côte d’Ivoire Expected results: Supporting young start-ups via mentoring, workshops and networking events, and making them investment-ready; developing skills and networks to promote growth via 25 projects by entrepreneurs from the five West African countries of Cameroon, Ghana, Nigeria, Senegal and Côte d’Ivoire; enabling exchange between Germany, France, Cameroon, Ghana, Nigeria, Senegal and Côte d’Ivoire
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Business models and international partnerships developed in the five West African countries; selected business ideas/start-ups financed and promoted: 15 projects in 2017 and 2018; 25 projects planned for 2019 and 2020; networking trips to Germany and France resulted in connections between the West African project participants and companies and (cultural) institutions in the two European countries and the five West African countries
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Federal Foreign Office
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Institut Français
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Start-Up Incubator Hub
Type of entity: 
Private Sector
Name of partner: 
Berlin School of Economics and Law
Type of entity: 
Private Sector
Name of partner: 
Agence Française de Développement
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Aktionsbühne Irak – Spotlight Iraq, 2018 to 2019

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Goethe-Institut e.V.
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Establishing the basic conditions for a flourishing cultural landscape in Iraq Target groups: Creative and cultural organisations in Iraq; cultural creators of all ages, with a special focus on young people aged between 18 and 35 Expected results: Supporting critical analysis of the term “cultural identity” and strengthening civil society dialogue in Iraq; providing financial resources as direct start-up support for Iraqi artists and cultural creators; implementing measures for training and qualification, networking/exchange and presentation/publication
Does it specifically target young people?: 
YES
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Twenty-four multidisciplinary projects by inspiring artists in Iraq funded between 2018 and 2019, selected by an independent jury from 88 applications in 2018 and 108 applications in 2019 from all over Iraq; a network developed and capacity-building provided for young cultural creators
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

EU124,000 (2018); EU161,000 (2019)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Federal Foreign Office
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Goal 4 - Promote Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Gender Equality

Ministries, governmental agencies and/or parliamentary bodies in charge of gender equality: 
Exist and are relevant for artists and cultural professionals
Policies and measures to support the full participation of women in cultural life have been implemented during the last 4 years: 
YES
Policies and measures have been adopted to support the recognition and advancement of women as artists, cultural professionals and/or creative entrepreneurs, (e.g. ensure equal pay for equal work or equal access to funding, coaching or mentoring schemes, anti-discrimination measures, etc.): 
YES
Data is regularly collected and disseminated to monitor: 
Gender equality in the culture and media sectors
Percentage of women/men in decision-making /managerial positions in public and private cultural and media: 
(In recent years, studies have been commissioned; for now, no data analysis from a government body on a federal, national level available)
Relevant Policies and Measures: 

Round table “Women in Culture and Media”, 2016 to 2017

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Attaining greater gender equality in culture and the media; placing more women in senior positions; ensuring balanced composition of committees and juries; narrowing the wage gap; improving compatibility of family and career (see 2016 Periodic Report, p. 54f.) Target groups: Experts in the visual arts, music, literature, the performing arts, film and media arts and the press and broadcasting Expected results: Over the course of a multi-month working period, devising concrete policy recommendations for improving equality of opportunities in the artistic and cultural sector
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Work begun in 2016 as an outgrowth of an initiative from 2015 and 2016 (see 2016 Periodic Report, p. 54f); concrete demands for improved gender equality developed: demands include equal representation on juries and committees under the Commissioner for Culture’s authority, making the round table permanent, gender monitoring via ongoing data collection, establishing prizes exclusively for women to be awarded by the Commissioner for Culture, improving women artists’ social circumstances, mentorships; the “Women in Culture and Media” project office was established at the German Cultural Council from 2017 to 2020 as a hub and for the sake of cementing activities, provided with extensive financial resources; the office conducts the mentorship programme and publishes a data report, see chapter 4.1.2.: Supporting women artists and cultural professionals
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

musicHHwomen – art.business.media, since 2017

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
RockCity Hamburg
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Promoting women and building their networks in the cultural and media sector; building women’s networks with each other and with important cultural players; improving women’s access to senior positions; overcoming ascribed roles and stereotypes; increasing the presence of women in the music industry Target groups: Women of different generations in Hamburg’s music industry, women musicians, producers, music technicians, teachers, salespeople, managers Expected results: Connecting women, raising their visibility, and supporting them financially throughout the music industry in Hamburg; offering strategic career counselling; arranging placements for mentees in the cultural community; establishing an alumnae network
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Measure launched in 2017; meet-ups such as the Club of Heroines promoted dialogue and skill sharing; music mentorship programme, business coaching sessions and advisory measures conducted; country’s first database of women in the music industry initiated and expanded, 286 entries as of December 2019; measure extended to other Land-level initiatives; national umbrella organisation “Music Women Germany” founded
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

A total of EU25,000 for three years: EU10,000 (2017); EU5000 (2018); EU10,000 (2019)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

“Women in Culture and Media” project office, 2017 to 2020

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
German Cultural Council (Deutscher Kulturrat e.V.)
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Promoting women and building their networks in the cultural and media sector; building women’s networks with each other and with important cultural players; improving women’s access to senior positions; overcoming ascribed roles and stereotypes; increasing the presence of women in the music industry Target groups: Women in culture and the media; women with extensive professional experience who seek senior positions Expected results: Implementing the first federal and cross-industry one-on-one mentorship programme for women seeking management responsibilities in culture and media; discussing issues of career and family planning; creating networks; improving data pool; establishing committee for gender equality
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
“Women in Culture and Media” project office founded at the German Cultural Council in 2017, initially until 2020; in the mentorship programme, career-minded women artists and women from the culture and media sector were paired with more established colleagues in the same profession to benefit from their wealth of experience and their network; 13 mentorship pairs implemented in the first cycle, 24 pairs in the second cycle, 30 pairs in the third cycle; four data reports slated for publication; interdisciplinary, gender-equitable committee established, statement to be adopted in the spring of 2020; two white papers written on the subjects of women in the creative economy and ageing as a cultural professional
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

EU350,000 (2017 to 2020): EU60,000 (2017); EU116,000 (2018); EU116,000 (2019)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
YES
If yes, what are the main conclusions/recommendations?: 

The number of mentorship pairs, consisting of one (woman) mentee and one mentor (of any gender) continually increased over the course of the programme (first cycle: 13 pairs; second cycle: 24 pairs; third cycle: 30 pairs); the number of applications for mentee positions remained steadily high; feedback was given by the participants in the mentorship programme and evaluated by the project office; a more extensive evaluation is scheduled to take place near the end of the third cycle

Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Themis: Trust Centre against Sexual Harassment and Violence, since 2018

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Themis: Trust Centre against Sexual Harassment and Violence (Themis – Vertrauensstelle gegen sexuelle Belästigung und Gewalt e.V.)
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Protecting and supporting victims of sexual harassment and violence in the cultural and media sector Target groups: Cultural and media professionals affected by sexual harassment and violence Expected results: Providing target groups with legal advice and psychological counselling in a safe space; ensuring the participation of trade associations and unions from the film and television sector as well as representatives of production companies, broadcasters, theatres, and orchestras in Germany in the trust centre’s work
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Trust centre established in 2018; grievances received and anonymously investigated; victims supported; sexual harassment and violence responded to and preventive measures taken
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Counselling work began on 1 October 2018;
* Funded by the Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media: EU61,000 (2018); EU100,000 (2019);
* EU113,000 in third-party funding (2018): EU5800 from the Producers' Alliance (Produzentenallianz); EU15,000 from the Theatre Association (Buhnenverein); EU20,000 from the VFF copyright collective; EU40,000 from the ARD public broadcasting network; EU15,000 from the ZDF public broadcaster; EU15,000 from the Association of Commercial Broadcasters and Audiovisual Services in Germany (VAUNET)
* EU125,000 in third-party funding (2019): EU10,000 from the Producers' Alliance; EU25,000 from the Theatre Association; EU20,000 from VFF; EU40,000 from ARD; EU15,000 from ZDF; EU15,000 from VAUNET
Total funding: EU399,000 (2018 and 2019)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
YES
If yes, what are the main conclusions/recommendations?: 

The trust centre documents cases reported to it (information, counselling, prevention) anonymously; documentation is not yet available at the time of writing (December 2019)

Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
ARD
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
ZDF
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
German Theatre Association
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Name of partner: 
Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Fuerza latina media project, since 2019

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Deutsche Welle (DW)
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Addressing international gender issues and disseminating knowledge; strengthening women’s participation in social, cultural and economic spheres; combating discrimination; empowering women with strengthened participation in the cultural and media industry Target groups: Women, girls and men in Latin America Expected results: Profiling successful women from the realms of politics, business, society, culture and sport in television segments, encouraging viewers to take action and emulate them as inspiring role models; getting men to rethink and make lasting changes to their ideas about women
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
48 TV partners in eight Latin American countries have added the broadcast to their schedule; large resonance in social media with teasers (web videos) on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram; full versions published on YouTube with tens of thousands of views and lively comments
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

Financed from federal funds

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Gender awareness in Egypt, 2016 to 2019

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Goethe-Institut e.V.
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Addressing international gender issues and disseminating knowledge; strengthening women’s participation in social, cultural and economic spheres; combating discrimination; empowering women with strengthened participation in the cultural and media industry Target groups: Civil society actors involved with gender; teachers; schoolchildren; social workers; activists as multipliers for knowledge about gender issues Expected results: Strengthening the self-confidence and self-image of Egyptian women on the level of civil society; promoting awareness of gender issues; establishing a participatory knowledge platform; gathering Arabic-language information on topics relating to gender and women’s issues; sparking dialogues; networking stakeholders and promoting the exchange of experience
Does it specifically target young people?: 
YES
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Young men and women have been trained to become multipliers in the gender sphere in the framework of “train the trainers”; networking meetings with stakeholders in gender issues have been organised in various Egyptian cities, including in structurally lagging regions of Egypt; developed and published “Gender Wiki”, a digital and participatory knowledge platform with extensive content and articles; workshops held for writers/editors and participants in the “Gender Wiki”; gender awareness training sessions offered for schoolchildren in Cairo and the Nile Delta as well as for young men and women in Upper Egypt
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

EU84,000 (2016); EU119,000 (2017); EU146,000 (2018); EU130,000 (2019)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Federal Foreign Office
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Arab Digital Expression Foundation
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)

Gender Equality and EU Funding for Culture: Workshop on Gender Equality in Art and Culture in the European Union, 2019

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Creative Europe Culture Desk, c/o Cultural Policy Society (Kulturpolitische Gesellschaft)
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Addressing diversity and gender equality in the artistic and cultural sectors; identifying characteristic representations of female and male roles; drafting policy proposals to end discrimination against women Target groups: Cultural actors, cultural-policy decision-makers, experts, academics from across Europe Expected results: Drawing up policy recommendations on gender equality in the artistic and cultural sectors on the basis of an exchange of experience; identifying target-oriented and pertinent priorities and recommended actions in preparation for Germany’s 2020 Presidency of the Council of the EU and the revision of the “Creative Europe” EU funding programme
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Specialist consultation with 25 participants from institutions with significant European subject-matter expertise; policy paper and flyer published (in English and German) with policy recommendations on each focus issue
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

EU25,000

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
Culture desk at Creative Europe
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Re│Shaping Cultural Policies 2020: Expert consultation on gender equality in cultural policy, 2019

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
German Commission for UNESCO
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Addressing diversity and gender equality in the artistic and cultural sectors; identifying characteristic representations of female and male roles; drafting policy proposals to end discrimination against women Target groups: Experts from Germany and abroad in the realms of international organisations (UNESCO, UN Women, EU); cultural institutions; academia; foundations; trade unions; business and civil society actors Expected results: Drawing up policy recommendations to improve gender equality, taking into consideration internationally identified practical examples; identifying target-oriented and relevant priorities and recommended actions in the context of UNESCO for the “Beijing+25” (2020) project and in preparation for Germany’s 2020 Presidency of the Council of the EU
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
International specialist consultation with 20 participants from institutions with significant subject-matter expertise; policy paper published as a brochure (in English and German) with policy recommendations; central demands: (obligatory) gender sensitivity training and educational measures on gender issues for all media and cultural professionals; documentation of examples of collective artistic and creative power structures and ascribed roles; prototype developed for gender-specific transformative cultural policy that strengthens the diversity of artistic forms of expression; closer investigation of a “certification” mechanism for the approval of public grants
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

EU25,000

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media
Type of entity: 
Public Sector
Name of partner: 
UNESCO
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

“Burning Issues” conference, 2019

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Ensemble Network (ensemble-netzwerk)
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Addressing diversity and gender equality in the artistic and cultural sectors; identifying characteristic representations of female and male roles; drafting policy proposals to end discrimination against women Target groups: Theatre professionals; cultural policy-makers and municipal and Land-level policy-makers Expected results: Holding a conference on gender equality issues in the theatre
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
In 2019, 500 theatre professionals, students, experts and politicians exchanged experiences and identified areas in need of improvement, particularly the gender pay gap, management styles, women in senior positions, the compatibility of family and career, portrayals of women on stage, the ageing process in the theatre/on stage; refined cultural policy goals
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Berlin Theatertreffen
Type of entity: 
Civil Society Organization (CSO)
Name of partner: 
Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Libertad artística

The constitution and/or national regulatory frameworks formally acknowledge: 
The right of artists to create without censorship or intimidation
The right of artists to disseminate and/or perform their artistic works
The right for all citizens to freely enjoy artistic works both in public and in private
The right for all citizens to take part in cultural life without restrictions
Independent bodies are established to receive complaints and/or monitor violations and restrictions to artistic freedom: 
NO
Initiatives to protect artists at risk or in exile have been developed or supported by public authorities during the last 4 years (e.g. providing safe houses, guidance and training, etc.): 
YES
Measures and initiatives intended to ensure transparent decision-making on government funding/ state grants and awards for artists exist (e.g. through independent committees, etc.): 
YES
Social protection measures that take the professional status of artists into account have been adopted or revised in the last 4 years (e.g. health insurance, retirement schemes, unemployment benefits, etc.): 
YES
Economic measures that take the status of artists into account have been adopted or revised in the last 4 years (e.g. collective agreements, income tax and other regulatory frameworks, etc.): 
YES
Relevant Policies and Measures: 

Martin Roth Initiative, since 2018

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Martin Roth Initiative
Institut für Auslandsbeziehungen (ifa)
Goethe-Institut e.V.
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Protecting artists and cultural professionals who are at risk or experiencing persecution and providing them with places of shelter; promoting artistic freedom and freedom of opinion in all countries; campaigning for international solidarity; enabling concrete advisory programmes and projects in Germany; promoting networking between German and international actors Target groups: Artists and cultural professionals around the world who advocate for artistic freedom, democracy and human rights in their countries Expected results: Ensuring temporary protection in Germany or in other countries for artists and cultural professionals; facilitating professional further training for the fellows via cooperative efforts with the cultural scene and local civil society in the host countries; ensuring that fellows return safely to their home country or that the foundation for their successful integration into the society of the host country has been laid; enabling artists to freely practise their professions in all countries; fellows of the Martin Roth Initiative have become ambassadors for a society that is committed to culture, peaceful, democratic and cosmopolitan in both the host countries and their home countries
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Since 2018, enabled protective stays for more than 40 artists and cultural professionals from all regions of the world, of which approx. 60% in Germany and approx. 40% in other secure countries; organised networking events to recruit potential host organisations for the implementation of protective stays; conducted research studies on working methods and effects of shelter programmes; published study “Temporary Shelter and Relocation Initiatives – Perspectives of Managers and Participants”, available online at www.martin-roth-initiative.de/de/publikation
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

EU1 million (2017 and 2018); EU2 million (2019)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
YES
If yes, what are the main conclusions/recommendations?: 

Results of evaluation workshop: fellows feel greater sense of security and successful integration in the host country; fellows have more creative possibilities and have advanced artistically. They rate the cooperation with the host institutions as successful; host institutions appreciate the sustainability-oriented nature of the protective stays and the mutual artistic and professional enrichment

Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
Goethe-Institut e.V.
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Berlin joins the International Cities of Refuge Network, 2018

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Berlin Senate Department for Culture and Europe
German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) Artists-in-Berlin Programme
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Protecting artists and cultural professionals who are at risk or experiencing persecution and providing them with places of shelter; promoting artistic freedom and freedom of opinion in all countries; campaigning for international solidarity; enabling concrete advisory programmes and projects in Germany; promoting networking between German and international actors Target groups: Artists and cultural professionals from the realms of literature, visual arts, film, performing arts and music who are professionally or personally at risk in their countries of origin Expected results: Boosting the public perception of the fellows in Berlin and effectively building their connections
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Fellowship awarded and housing provided to one ICORN fellow in 2019; fellow established a good network in Berlin, performed for a large audience on World Poetry Day, 20 March, and gave two lectures at Freie Universität Berlin; trilingual publication released
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

EU50,000 (2019)

“Weltoffenes Berlin” fellowship programme, since 2018

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Berlin Senate Department for Culture and Europe
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Protecting artists and cultural professionals who are at risk or experiencing persecution and providing them with places of shelter; promoting artistic freedom and freedom of opinion in all countries; campaigning for international solidarity; enabling concrete advisory programmes and projects in Germany; promoting networking between German and international actors Target groups: Artists, media and cultural professionals; Berlin cultural actors Expected results: Facilitating access to professional life for artistic, media or cultural professionals who have left or wish to leave their former countries of residence due to political circumstances; setting up specific programmes and structures to support the target groups; strategically expanding existing programmes and structures and qualitatively strengthening them; enabling professional collaborations between Berlin cultural actors and working artists, media and cultural professionals (fellows); financially supporting 12–18 fellowships and 3–4 advisory projects per year
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
In 2018 and 2019, 29 fellowships funded via the “Weltoffenes Berlin” fellowship programmes and the “Advice, support, and networking for transnational professionals working in art, media, and culture” support programme in the fields of visual arts, acting, dance, film, music and journalism; for artists from Syria, Iraq, Turkey, Egypt, Yemen, Honduras and Poland
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

EU450,000 (2018); EU450,000 (2019)

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

Joint Declaration by the Culture Ministers and Senators of Culture of the Länder on Cultural and Artistic Freedom of 13 March 2019

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Conference of Cultural Ministers of the Länder (Kultur-MK)
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
Main aims: Promoting and preserving cultural policy actions and cultural diversity in Germany and legally protecting them to that end; explicitly affirming the right to cultural freedom and diversity, in particular as per Article 5 of Germany’s Basic Law; strengthening open and democratic society Target groups: Political decision-makers, artists, cultural professionals, entire population Expected results: Declaring the cultural diversity of a free, open and democratic society to be the central benchmark of political action; assuring cultural institutions’ right to take critical stances towards social or political issues; securing and expanding the scope to exercise these freedoms
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
At their inaugural meeting on 13 March 2019, the 16 cultural ministers and senators of culture of the Länder articulated and published a clear statement declaring that cultural and artistic freedom served as the foundation underpinning the joint efforts of the Conference of Cultural Ministers
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
The 16 Land cultural ministers, senators for culture

Measures and Initiatives reported by Civil Society Organizations

Describe how the CSO form has been used to promote collaboration with CSOs in the preparation of this report, including the distribution of the form and the modalities of collection and analysis of the information received. Please indicate the percentage of measures and initiatives received that have been considered as relevant by the Party and included in the QPR.: 
From July to October 2019, the National Point of Contact called on civil society actors to submit relevant initiatives and measures for the Third State Report. The above-mentioned form was used for this purpose. At the suggestion of civil society actors, the National Point of Contact had also invited all stakeholders to participate in an online consultation as early as summer 2018 in the course of monitoring the implementation of the 2005 UNESCO Convention. In addition, the National Point of Contact 2018 and 2019 proactively conducted in-depth research and analyses. In this way, approximately 100 relevant measures and initiatives had been identified by 1 October 2019. Some 70 comments and the results of the consultation on 21 January 2020 were taken into account for the preparation of the second draft (version of 27 January 2020).
GOAL 1 - Support sustainable systems of governance for culture: 

Arabic-language guided tours of Berlin museums; intercultural glass workshops, since 2016

Name of CSO(s) responsible for the implementation of the measure/initiative: 
Multaka: Treffpunkt Museum; Berlin Glas e.V.
Cultural domains covered by the measure/initiative: 
Diseño
Las artes escénicas
Artes visuales
Describe the main features of the measure/initiative: 
Main aims: Helping refugees access and experience museums in Berlin; increasing intercultural creativity; enabling exchange Target groups: A) Guided tours: Arabic-speaking refugees B) Workshops: anyone living in the city Expected results: A) Offering guided tours by refugees for refugees in Berlin museums; enabling new arrivals to experience museums and their objects; attempting to reconcile past and present B) Setting up workshops to encourage mutual awareness of diverse cultural backgrounds among new arrivals and Berlin locals; establishing knowledge transfer in both directions between locals and new arrivals
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does this measure/initiative receive or has it received International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) funding?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the measure/initiative?: 
A) Arabic-speaking tour guides trained for four Berlin museums; numerous Arabic-language guided tours of four Berlin museums performed regularly and successfully since 2016; new visitor groups able to experience the objects displayed in the museums B) Participants at seven glass-blowing workshops in 2018 able to experience the shared historical and cultural connections between Syria, Iraq and Germany

European Agenda for Music, since 2018

Name of CSO(s) responsible for the implementation of the measure/initiative: 
European Music Council
Cultural domains covered by the measure/initiative: 
Música
Las artes escénicas
Describe the main features of the measure/initiative: 
Main aims: Protecting and promoting European music; creating lasting networks between stakeholders in the music business throughout Europe Target groups: Policy-makers active at the local, regional, national and European levels; the European music sector in collaboration with the non-profit sector; amateurs; the music industry Expected results: Giving the diverse stakeholders in the music sector an equal voice in the dialogue between decision-makers and music sector stakeholders; setting priorities for the future: fostering education, diversity, shaping of society, technology, recognition, data collection, dissemination, mobility and partnerships; uniting the many voices of the music sector to establish an ongoing dialogue between policy-makers and music sector stakeholders
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does this measure/initiative receive or has it received International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) funding?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the measure/initiative?: 
Long-term process launched in 2012; new results in the 2016–2019 reporting period: since 2015, working groups formed with experts from across the music sector, with a special focus on non-profits and the music industry; European Agenda for Music published in 2018 with a focus on nine topics: education and access to music, diversity, shaping society, technology, mobility, recognition, cooperation and partnership, dissemination, data collection and analysis; networks established between stakeholders in the music industry; European Agenda for Music incorporated into members’ organisational strategies; European Agenda for Music presented at the Creative Industry Working Group of the Conference of Economics Ministers (Arbeitskreis Kreativwirtschaft der Wirtschaftsministerkonferenz) in North Rhine-Westphalia; showcase conference organised in Poland in May 2019 and translated into multiple languages: French, Polish, Dutch, Hungarian and Latvian

Writing On (Weiter Schreiben), an initiative for authors who have sought refuge in Germany, since 2017

Name of CSO(s) responsible for the implementation of the measure/initiative: 
Wir machen das! wearedoingit e.V.
Cultural domains covered by the measure/initiative: 
Industria editorial
Describe the main features of the measure/initiative: 
Main aims: Creating conditions that will enable creative writing and publishing for authors who have sought refuge in Germany Target groups: Authors who have sought refuge in Germany Expected results: Helping refugees to continue writing literature; opening the German literary scene to refugees and thereby enriching it
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does this measure/initiative receive or has it received International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) funding?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the measure/initiative?: 
Platform for literature and music established, facilitating exchange between artists from crisis zones and from Germany; illustrated texts published online in German and their original language; multiple readings with music performed in well-known literary institutions; first issue of the Writing On Magazine (Weiter Schreiben Magazin) published in 2019 on the theme of “Houses – Gardens – Ruins”

Everyone has the Right to Art (Jeder hat ein Recht auf Kunst), 2017

Name of CSO(s) responsible for the implementation of the measure/initiative: 
farbwerk e.V.
Cultural domains covered by the measure/initiative: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Artes visuales
Describe the main features of the measure/initiative: 
Main aims: Promoting the inclusion of people with disabilities in the cultural and arts sectors Target groups: People with and without disabilities Expected results: Establishing artistic and creative work by people with disabilities as a serious artistic position
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does this measure/initiative receive or has it received International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) funding?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the measure/initiative?: 
Five performance workshops organised for people with disabilities in 2017; inclusive street-theatre events performed on two squares in Dresden’s old town

Welcome to my Library, 2016 to 2019

Name of CSO(s) responsible for the implementation of the measure/initiative: 
Land Network of Migrant Organisations in Saxony-Anhalt (Landesnetzwerk der Migrantenorganisationen in Sachsen-Anhalt, LAMSA)
Cultural domains covered by the measure/initiative: 
Las artes escénicas
Industria editorial
Describe the main features of the measure/initiative: 
Main aims: Understanding migration and diversity as opportunities; giving all children access to the mainstream education system Target groups: Kindergarten-aged children in Saxony-Anhalt Expected results: Introducing kindergarten-aged children with a migrant background to library resources; linking libraries with daycare centres and migrant-led organisations or initiatives; enabling intercultural exchange for all children at the participating daycare centres
Does it specifically target young people?: 
YES
Does this measure/initiative receive or has it received International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) funding?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the measure/initiative?: 
Four partnerships established between libraries, daycare centres and organisations in Saxony-Anhalt; institutions made aware of multilingual and intercultural family backgrounds; multilingual literary resources developed; language courses and skills development offered to daycare and library employees; project extended to the end of 2019, following a pilot phase in 2016

First report by the International Theatre Institute on the global implementation of the 2005 Convention, as a contribution to the second report by civil society organisations on the implementation of the 2005 Convention, 2019

Name of CSO(s) responsible for the implementation of the measure/initiative: 
German Centre of the International Theatre Institute
Describe the main features of the measure/initiative: 
Main aims: Strengthening civil society organisations in monitoring the Convention; helping to link the theatre sector with civil society organisations and UNESCO Target groups: The national and international theatre sector; international civil society actors Expected results: Providing those in the theatre sector with in-depth knowledge of the Convention and its goals; promoting stronger engagement with cultural policy among theatre organisations
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does this measure/initiative receive or has it received International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) funding?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the measure/initiative?: 
First survey-based database of ITI centres worldwide established in 2019 about the implementation of the 2005 Convention; 30% of ITI centres participated in the online survey; importance of the Convention for the performing arts highlighted; further need for action emphasised, such as more financial and human resources for the ITI centres; cooperation and communication improved with the National Commissions for UNESCO, such as those in Eastern Europe; conceptual and editorial input provided via the international CSO interim steering committee for the second civil society report on the implementation of the 2005 Convention, published in 2019
GOAL 2 - Achieve a balanced flow of cultural goods and services and increase the mobility of artists and cultural professionals: 

Operndolmuş, Komische Oper Berlin, since 2012

Name of CSO(s) responsible for the implementation of the measure/initiative: 
Musicians of the Komische Oper Berlin
Cultural domains covered by the measure/initiative: 
Música
Las artes escénicas
Describe the main features of the measure/initiative: 
Main aims: Enabling international and intercultural encounters between different people of all ages; using music as a world language Target groups: General public; musicians; partner organisations in the host towns/cities Expected results: Promoting intercultural education and mobility for artists; bringing professional musicians together with children; getting children excited about opera
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does this measure/initiative receive or has it received International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) funding?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the measure/initiative?: 
New results in the 2016–2019 reporting period: bus tour organised in 2016 along the “guestworker route”, i.e. Berlin – Vienna – Belgrade – Athens – Ankara; new ideas for exchange and collaboration between concert halls explored and agreed with musicians in the cities along the route; since 2012, working with children throughout Germany in facilities and neighbourhoods with a high share of people from different cultural backgrounds, and getting them interested in opera music

Future Lab Tunisia, since 2017, based on the Future Lab (Zukunftslabor) project of the Deutsche Kammerphilharmonie Bremen (DKB), since 2007

Name of CSO(s) responsible for the implementation of the measure/initiative: 
Deutsche Kammerphilharmonie Bremen (DKB)
Future Lab Tunisia
Cultural domains covered by the measure/initiative: 
Música
Las artes escénicas
Describe the main features of the measure/initiative: 
Main aims: Realising individual potential; strengthening children and young people by giving them the opportunity to be on stage; enabling societal and city-district development through music Expected results: Initiating and realising close, daily presence and collaboration for professional ensembles in and with schools; designing and implementing an inclusive music project with children, young people and their families in disadvantaged neighbourhoods; using this to give children self-confidence and respectful recognition; establishing high-level music as part of neighbourhood culture and as an engine for change Target groups: Pupils of Ibn Khaldoun middle school in Tunisia and their families; the school’s socio-cultural environment; the wider Tunisian public via communication in the media
Does it specifically target young people?: 
YES
Does this measure/initiative receive or has it received International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) funding?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the measure/initiative?: 
Ibn Khaldoun middle school in Manouba, Tunisia, with over 400 pupils, identified as a rehearsal base for the Tunisian National Orchestra; relaxed, voluntary daily exchange facilitated between pupils and professional musicians; Melody of Life performed annually in Tunis and Bremen, and a Community Opera performed in 2019; foundation stone laid in January 2020 for a new rehearsal space and concert hall at Ibn Khaldoun middle school
GOAL 3 - Integrate culture in sustainable development frameworks: 

Project Office for Dialogue between Sustainability and Culture (Projektbüro für Dialog zwischen Nachhaltigkeit und Kultur), since 2018

Name of CSO(s) responsible for the implementation of the measure/initiative: 
German Cultural Council
Describe the main features of the measure/initiative: 
Main aims: Contributing to sustainable development in society; enabling a shift in perspective in the sustainability discourse between the nature/environmental field and cultural-policy activities Target Groups: citizens, businesses, politics and public administration Expected results: Strengthening awareness of sustainability among actors in the cultural sector
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does this measure/initiative receive or has it received International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) funding?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the measure/initiative?: 
Round table established in 2018 for sharing points of view and creating links between the areas of sustainability and culture; policy paper on the UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development drafted, entitled “Implementing the 2030 Agenda is a Cultural Task”; articles and publications published

Stories of Change & Sukuma Awards, Dresden, since 2012

Name of CSO(s) responsible for the implementation of the measure/initiative: 
Sukuma arts e.V.
Describe the main features of the measure/initiative: 
Main aims: Promoting cultural education for sustainable consumption Target groups: people interested in film, amateur directors, students Expected results: Achieving lasting change in everyday actions and consumer behaviour to make them fit for the future; promoting urban communities that are more liveable, sustainable and outward-looking; strengthening media literacy
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does this measure/initiative receive or has it received International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) funding?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the measure/initiative?: 
Cinema advertising used to raise awareness of global sustainability; award ceremonies and ideas competitions on the annual theme: Sod Off! (Bodenlose Frechheit, 2015/16), Swap, Share, Make (Tauschen, Teilen, Selbermachen, 2016/17) and Digitalisation (2018/19); wide range of workshops for young people run in schools

Future Conference for Children: “How do we want to live (together)?” (Zukunftskonferenz der Kinder "Wie wollen wir (zusammen) leben?"), Dresden, 2017 to 2018

Name of CSO(s) responsible for the implementation of the measure/initiative: 
tjg. theater junge generation
Cultural domains covered by the measure/initiative: 
Las artes escénicas
Describe the main features of the measure/initiative: 
Main aims: Promoting cultural education for young people in the field of sustainable urban development Target groups: school classes from grade five to eight Expected results: Allowing children and young people to share ideas about the future of their towns/cities and about living shared and sustainable lives; running project activities with artists in general-education schools and theatres
Does this measure/initiative receive or has it received International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) funding?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the measure/initiative?: 
Theatre used as a cultural medium for cultural education in 2017/18; children in years five to eight introduced to the city of tomorrow through artistic exploration; links established between school classes and artists
GOAL 4 - Promote human rights and fundamental freedoms: 

Improved working conditions for pregnant artists at German theatres, since 2018

Name of CSO(s) responsible for the implementation of the measure/initiative: 
German Theatre Association (Deutscher Bühnenverein)
German theatres and orchestras
Cultural domains covered by the measure/initiative: 
Las artes escénicas
Describe the main features of the measure/initiative: 
Main aims: Improving the working conditions for pregnant artists, particularly those subject to maternity protection; upgrading the economic situation of female artists Target groups: Pregnant artists performing in German state theatres Expected results: Raising fees; providing pregnant artists with certainty for planning
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does this measure/initiative receive or has it received International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) funding?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the measure/initiative?: 
Minimum fee for pregnant artists raised to at least €2000 as of 1 April 2018; pregnant artists now receive guaranteed protection against non-extension of their contracts; temporary contracts are therefore no longer an existential risk if an artist falls pregnant

Arts Rights Justice Academy, UNESCO Chair at the University of Hildesheim, 2017 to 2019

Name of CSO(s) responsible for the implementation of the measure/initiative: 
UNESCO Chair in Cultural Policy for the Arts in Development, University of Hildesheim
Describe the main features of the measure/initiative: 
Main aims: Understanding, protecting and defending the freedom of artistic expression and artists at risk Target groups: Cultural actors, particularly those in situations in which freedom of artistic expression is at risk or under threat Expected results: Strengthening and expanding structures for promoting and protecting artistic freedom; ensuring that knowledge is shared; imparting and professionalising skills and knowledge in the field of artistic expression
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does this measure/initiative receive or has it received International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) funding?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the measure/initiative?: 
One ARJ Academy and one ARJ Forum held in both 2017 and 2018 with over 30 partner organisations; regional workshops organised in Salvador-Bahia (Brazil) and Beirut (Lebanon); legal and economic frameworks discussed; mobility and access to visas discussed; training sessions about financing and networking offered

Study entitled “Audiovisual Diversity? Gender Representation in German Film and Television”, 2017

Name of CSO(s) responsible for the implementation of the measure/initiative: 
University of Rostock
MaLisa Foundation
Cultural domains covered by the measure/initiative: 
Cine / Artes audiovisuales
Las artes escénicas
Describe the main features of the measure/initiative: 
Main aims: Addressing diversity and gender equality in the artistic and cultural sectors; identifying characteristic representations of female and male roles Target groups: The film and television industry Expected results: Conducting a study on the role of women and men in fictional productions and entertainment formats, and on their positioning and presentation as experts in journalistic and documentary content
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does this measure/initiative receive or has it received International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) funding?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the measure/initiative?: 
Detailed analyses conducted of over 3000 hours of TV shows from 2016, and of over 800 German-language films from 2013 to 2019; data showed that women appear less in German audiovisual media, across all television programmes; just one in three people in the field of TV journalism is a woman, especially among presenters and journalists; three-page summary published describing courses of action for achieving more gender equality in film and television; position paper listing 15 commitments on gender equality published by German film schools, recognised internationally as best practice, and named by the Council of Europe as the only German measure in the context of implementing its recommendation on gender equality in the audiovisual sector (CM/Rec(2017)9)
On the basis of the analysis of the responses provided through the CSO form, present up to ten main priorities of CSOs to implement the Convention over the next four years.: 
On the basis of the January 2020 consultation, the CSOs identified the following priorities for the future implementation of the 2005 UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions: (1) The cultural practices of cooperative cultural policy that have already been achieved in Germany are valuable and exceptional and ought to be appreciated and preserved. Many of the initiatives and measures specified in the Periodic Report are considerably shaped by civil society. This particularly applies to new initiatives in rural areas that significantly strengthen the possibilities for cultural participation and likewise applies to new areas of investigation such as the role of art and culture in preventive healthcare and its development. (2) This collaboration should be accorded continued political recognition and be actively expanded by cultural administration authorities. Democratic processes, structures, participation and partnerships are in the throes of significant change. Communication is shifting and becoming more open. In the future, this should be strengthened by advancing formats for networking, participation and cooperation. (3) Germany should continue to work internationally for a strong and independent civil society. Over the past four years, in many parts of the world, the working conditions for independent civil society actors have considerably worsened in legal, financial and physical terms. An improvement is not apparent at this time. Transformative partnerships with civil society actors in other regions of the world are essential to the culture of fairer cooperation on equal footing as envisaged by the Convention. (4) In civil society – be it in countries of the Global South, in emerging economies or in Germany and Europe – there exist numerous experiences and innovative approaches that can and do bring about productive outcomes. To this end, it is particularly important that all of the currently 148 Parties to this UNESCO Convention recognise the involvement of civil society in promoting the diversity of cultural forms of expression. (5) Today, people of different backgrounds, cultural identities and traditions live in Germany. Diversity has thus become the norm and an intrinsic component of a changing society. Artistic projects contribute to understanding and exchange in Germany and serve as laboratories and testing grounds for successful cohabitation. It is therefore a major concern of civil society that artists and cultural professionals with migration backgrounds should not be reduced to or defined by these, but should be perceived and treated like all other artists and cultural professionals. (6) In the cultural and creative sector as well as elsewhere, the discussion on climate must not only remain active but be intensified and broadened with an eye to mobility versus digitalisation. Viable approaches for sustainable production alternatives in sectors such as film and music or festivals are of particular interest in this area. A connected question is how to strengthen the sustainability of artist residency programmes. This can be promoted by working with alumni systematically and studying their subsequent careers. (7) Civil society actors have committed themselves to pursuing and practising gender parity in culture and the media. These commitments should be evaluated. From the perspective of civil society actors, gender parity should become a criterion for public funding in the area of art and culture. It is also notable that the numerous positive cultural measures on gender equality do not currently address the full gamut of gender issues. (8) The project-based and mostly short-term funding of numerous civil society measures in the cultural, artistic and creative sector remains a challenge, especially from the perspectives of knowledge transfer, effectiveness, sustainability and learning from evaluations. Evaluating projects more consistently, especially those that have succeeded over many years, should lead to structurally cementing the good practices found in positive results and would help with the development of sustainable structures. In parallel, flexibility for innovation should be preserved by allocating funds to pilot projects and by pursuing innovative funding concepts that lie somewhere in between project-based and structural funding models. (9) The process of consulting with civil society as part of compiling the Quadrennial Periodic Report has become clearer, more comprehensible and easier thanks to the framework for goals and monitoring, applied for the first time in 2019, with its four colour-coded goal areas “Governance for Culture”, “Balanced Flow of Cultural Goods and Services and Mobility”, “Culture and Sustainable Development” and “Promotion of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms”. This should be expanded upon. In the future, this process too could be strengthened and deepened with formats for networking, participation and cooperation that remain to be further developed.

Emerging Transversal Issues

Relevant Policies and Measures: 

European Year of Cultural Heritage 2018

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
German Cultural Heritage Committee (Deutsches Nationalkomitee für Denkmalschutz)
Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media
The 16 Federal Länder of Germany
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
In the framework of the European Year of Cultural Heritage 2018 (EYCH), European countries successfully foregrounded their common diverse cultural heritage in the public eye with numerous events, projects and initiatives. The EYCH was initiated by the European Commission, which was following an initiative from Germany, for which the German Cultural Heritage Committee (Deutsches Nationalkomitee für Denkmalschutz), the Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media and the Länder strenuously advocated on both European and national levels. The focus in Germany was on architectural and archaeological heritage. Many projects have demonstrated the close links between the different forms of cultural heritage, whether material or immaterial. The younger generation should be especially encouraged to identify with cultural heritage and its diversity. Numerous initiatives in this area have been spearheaded by civil society.
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Thus, the 2018 Year of Cultural Heritage also boosted the visibility of civil society’s involvement in cultural life. Actors continued to participate at all levels of government. An online platform gives an overview of the projects during the European Year of Cultural Heritage: https://sharingheritage.de/
Financial resources allocated to the policy/measure in USD: 

The Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media's cultural budget included a total of EU7.8 million (2017 and 2018) for projects of significance across Germany. Projects were eligible for funding in the period from 2017 to 2019. These financial resources complemented the commitments of the Lander and municipalities as well as those of civil society.

Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
If yes, what are the main conclusions/recommendations?: 

2019 Bauhaus Centenary: Rethinking the World

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Federal Government
Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media
German Federal Cultural Foundation
eleven Federal Länder of Germany
three Bauhaus institutions in Weimar, Dessau and Berlin
Bauhaus Association 2019
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
With the Bauhaus, a cultural awakening began in Germany in the early 20th century. The members of the Bauhaus were engaged in redesigning living spaces for the Industrial Age – from the design of simple domestic devices to the architecture of personal working and living environments. The Bauhaus only existed for 14 years. It was founded in Weimar in 1919, moved to Dessau in 1925 and was compelled to close in 1933 in Berlin under pressure from the Nazis. Many Bauhaus teachers and students were forcibly displaced. At the same time, this displacement spread their ideas around the world. Then and now, the Bauhaus is emblematic of a modern, open and free society. Germany, as a nation of culture, has a special responsibility to preserve and disseminate this heritage and to draw links between it and the Bauhaus approaches that remain current to this day in the realms of architecture, art and design. With this in mind, its 100-year anniversary was honoured as a national celebration with international visibility and more than 2500 events. With the slogan “Rethinking the World”, the Federal Government, represented by the Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media and the German Federal Cultural Foundation, eleven Länder and the three Bauhaus institutions in Weimar, Dessau and Berlin all came together as the Bauhaus Association 2019 to celebrate the centenary across Germany.
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
Numerous contributions on architecture, art, design, performance, society and education were published digitally. Interviews and articles touched on the transformation of modern cities, the role of women as drivers of innovation and the design of virtual worlds, among other topics. The highlights of the centenary included the grand opening of the two new Bauhaus museums in Weimar and Dessau, the international opening festival held in Berlin in January 2019, the international exhibition project “bauhaus imaginista” and the Grand Tour of Modernism, for which 100 of Germany’s modernist buildings and structures of importance to cultural history were selected.
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO

BTHVN 2020: Rediscover Beethoven

Name of agency responsible for the implementation of the policy/measure: 
Beethoven Anniversary ltd. (Beethoven Jubiläums GmbH)
Federal Government
Land North Rhine-Westphalia
City of Bonn
Rhine-Sieg district
Describe the main features of the policy/measure: 
In the anniversary year of 2020, as part of the UNESCO International Days programme, Germany is celebrating the 250th birthday of Ludwig van Beethoven with the world, with approximately 300 projects under the banner “Rediscover Beethoven”. Aside from drawing attention to Beethoven’s work, there is a particular goal of strengthening and financially supporting innovative associated artistic projects. In tandem with the UN Climate Change secretariat (UNFCCC), the Beethoven Pastoral Project has a special focus on climate and environmental protection. By way of Beethoven’s Sixth Symphony, artists, civil society, governments, cities and municipalities around the globe are showing their artistic advocacy for climate protection. The project’s patron is the Secretary-General of the United Nations. This Germany-wide event with international visibility is organised by a cooperative coalition. Beethoven Anniversary (Beethoven Jubiläums GmbH) is coordinating it with support from the Federal Government, Land North Rhine-Westphalia, the City of Bonn and the Rhine-Sieg district. Its patron is the President of the Federal Republic of Germany.
Does it specifically target young people?: 
NO
Does the International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) support the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
NO
What are the results achieved so far through the implementation of the policy/measure?: 
The diverse range of events offers musical experiences of many kinds throughout the year: concerts; exhibitions; operatic, dance or theatrical productions; symposia and educational programmes; everything from historical-critical performances to contemporary artistic activities such as concerts for deaf people or remix formats from jazz and world music. A calendar was created for primary schools to teach young schoolchildren about Beethoven and arouse interest in music in general.
Has the implementation of the policy/measure been evaluated?: 
NO
Partner(s) engaged in the implementation of the measure: 
Name of partner: 
President of the Federal Republic of Germany
Type of entity: 
Public Sector

Challenges and Achievements

Describe the main results achieved to implement the Convention (at least one major achievement in one of the four goals): 
Main results In regard to strengthening sustainable systems of governance in the cultural sector, the trend previously reported in 2016 remains ongoing: Länder and municipalities have been drawing up longer-term guidelines and development strategies for culture as well as, in some cases, legislation to underpin robust cultural infrastructure that fosters diversity of cultural expression. With their concepts, Länder and local authorities are actively responding to demographic, digital and ecological transformations and thus sustainably strengthening cultural policy. For several local authorities, this has been demonstrated by their respective bids to become the European Capital of Culture in 2025. Likewise, the UNESCO Creative Cities Network (UCCN) is contributing to the attainment of the goals of the 2005 UNESCO Convention, setting the example for its implementation on the municipal level. During the reporting period, the network grew from four to six cities in Germany. The innovative capacities of cultural infrastructures and institutions are becoming even more important, demonstrating that the principle of multiple actors has become the norm in this area of governance when it comes to cooperative cultural policy in Germany: different public agencies are involved, often responding to initiatives from segments of civil society with specialist backgrounds in the field. Important initiatives to strengthen cultural participation in rural regions and through new pathways to art and culture have been co-developed with various partners, often with the aid of evaluation results. On the part of the state, several new structural components were introduced during the reporting period. These include a Conference of Cultural Ministers of the Länder (Kultur-MK), which was established in 2019 under the auspices of the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany; the role of Minister of State for International Cultural Policy at the Federal Foreign Office, introduced in 2018; and the new Division for media, culture, creative industries and sport at the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, established in 2017. Today, cultural diversity has become the norm and an intrinsic component of a changing society. Artistic projects contribute to understanding and dialogue in society. During the reporting period, many refugees arrived in Germany from crisis and war zones. Some of the measures reported on here were in response to this development. Ensuring that digitalisation supports and promotes creativity and the diversity of cultural content will require not only rules and guidelines but also a willingness to pro-actively expand digital skills. A “media diversity monitor” has now been universally deployed across Germany. The plurality of media systems continues to guarantee freedom of opinion and a diversity of contributions, providing all citizens with various entry points to the media while ensuring that the populace has a presence in the media. New radio programmes during the reporting period are responding to the changed consumption habits of younger generations and society’s multilingualism. An interministerial Digital Cabinet was formed to oversee the monitoring of the Federal Government’s implementation strategy. Multi-year transformation programmes for museums, archives and libraries are responding to the digital environment’s challenges and disruptions. To strengthen the competencies and capacities of civil society actors, a five-year Land-level pilot project is creating new structures with year-round financial support and greater transparency in order to cement and strengthen the effectiveness of socio-cultural efforts in regard to cultural diversity, cultural participation and cultural education. Cultural content and forms of expression from countries in the Global South have gained visibility thanks to international and development cooperation, co-productions, mobility, preferential treatment and artist residencies. A clear emphasis here is on Africa, which was the focus of several measures, partly in response to the debate, related to Germany’s colonial history and the handling of collections from colonial contexts that has been ongoing since 2017. The electronic service platform to facilitate the mobility of artists, as previously reported in 2016, was expanded to include the music sector in 2018. Moreover, a Turkish-language version was added. Numerous residency programmes that foster the intercultural exchange of creatives and promote networking and cooperation on domestic and international levels came together to co-establish a Germany-wide dialogue platform in 2018. Thanks to the platform, these programmes will be better tailored to the needs of international artists and will continue to strengthen their contribution to dismantling imbalances. The successful programmes for publishers and for emerging cinematic talent have been further deepened and expanded. In 2019, these programmes actively participated in the new medium-term cooperation initiative “Fair Culture”, which is about the concept of preferential treatment in the artistic and cultural sector. The “Fair Culture” approach sparked a positive response from the artistic and creative sector. During the reporting period, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development has shaped the role of culture in strategies for sustainable development. The German Sustainable Development Strategy, initially adopted in 2017 and revised in 2018, was the first to incorporate the concept of a “culture of sustainability” as a guiding principle, whereby public programming funds were made available for transformative cultural projects. Important sectors of the creative industry, such as film and television, are developing prototypes for ecologically responsible production methods, thus confronting current challenges such as climate change. Strengthening the artistic and cultural sector, particularly in countries of Africa and the Near East such as Iraq, remains at the centre of international and development cooperation. Within the context of its development cooperation efforts, the Federal Government also supports cultural professionals and cultural institutions in partner countries by helping to improve education and training opportunities, create jobs and incomes, set up networks with relevant national, regional and international actors and improve the general conditions. These measures are implemented, for example, via the Global Project Culture and Creative Industries in six pilot countries in Africa and the Near East (2018 to 2020) and a lab project in five West African countries (2017 to 2020). Promoting human rights and fundamental freedoms is a requirement for implementing this UNESCO cultural convention. In 2016, on the basis of sample data (see the 2016 Periodic Report, pp. 54–56), the necessity of establishing gender equality in the artistic and cultural sector was recognised. On this basis, during the reporting period, mentorship programmes to promote women, as well as other initiatives, were significantly expanded, the risk of violence was reduced and, overall, this set of issues was embedded transversally in many different projects. Gender equality in the artistic and cultural sector is also a declared focus of Germany’s Presidency of the Council of the EU in the second half of 2020, 25 years after the UN’s Fourth World Conference on Women. The professional, social and economic position of artists was reviewed in 2018 on the basis of the UNESCO Recommendation on the Status of the Artist (1980). This was done based on the monitoring system of this convention. On that basis, in early 2019, Germany submitted to UNESCO a 40-page implementation report on the professional, social and economic status of artists in Germany, which is included as an annex to this Periodic Report. By taking new measures, such as the Martin Roth Initiative, to protect artists and cultural professionals under threat, by intensifying its cooperation in the International Cities of Refuge Network, and by releasing general statements in response to developments, Germany has acknowledged in political terms and reinforced in practical terms the importance of protecting artistic freedom.
Describe the main challenges encountered to implement the Convention and the main solutions found or envisaged to overcome them: 
Main challenges and solutions found or envisaged In its speed and scope, the digital revolution is as far-reaching – for art and culture, for artists and users alike – as the Industrial Revolution was. The promotion of digital creativity as a tool of popular culture and media culture must be institutionalised. Solutions found or envisaged: Initiating further-training campaigns for cultural actors and institutions; creating connections between the analogue and digital worlds; establishing transparency of algorithms and strengthening democratic initiatives in the digital environment; regulating the rights of cultural professionals pertaining to the use of their work in the digital environment in a legally secure and future-proof fashion; revisiting the overarching policy issue of creating an independent European digital platform architecture. Refining public funding structures, the basis of knowledge and the availability of data: the fact that public funding of numerous measures in the cultural and creative sector is mostly project-based poses a challenge to knowledge transfer, self-evaluation, sustainability and experience-gathering. Solutions found or envisaged: In the case of projects that have proven themselves over many years and been positively evaluated, creating options for reliable structures that retain flexibility for innovation and further development; strengthening interdisciplinary cultural-policy research and cultural statistics to be legally secured as appropriate, for example in regard to aspects of cultural participation and gender equality. Illiberal democracies and political systems that are increasingly re-nationalising present a challenge to artistic freedom and international cooperation. Networks that were robust for many years are eroding. Fundamental rights are in some cases being enormously restricted; artists are under threat. Solutions found or envisaged: Ensuring rapid responsiveness in crisis situations thanks to emergency plans and funds, including addressing visa issues; cementing and expanding existing measures for the protection of artists and cultural professionals at risk; continuing the dialogue between the Federal Foreign Office and civil society around the mobility of artists that began in 2016 in regard to visa requirements.
Describe the steps planned in the next four years to further implement the Convention and the priority areas identified for future policy action based on the conclusions of the current reporting process: 
Next steps for 2020 to 2023 Using Germany’s Presidency of the Council of the EU (in the second half of 2020) in particular to spark momentum in the realms of culture and gender equality with a special focus on women in the spirit of the Convention’s goals. Additional focuses: diversity, sustainability, cultural heritage. Actively harnessing the recently adopted UNESCO Open Roadmap for the Implementation of the 2005 Convention in the Digital Environment (2018) in and by Germany on the basis of the current joint initiative with France and Canada. Create 2030: Establishing culture within the sustainability discourse and cementing it in future updates to the German Sustainability Strategy. Advancing, deepening and further Europeanising the Fair Culture Initiative; recruiting partners from other Parties to the Convention; analysing cultural value chains; exploring components of preferential treatment in suitable institutional and legal frameworks as well as the development of Fair Culture prototypes; promoting fair working conditions for creatives in the Global South. Actively harnessing the monitoring framework of the 2005 UNESCO Convention to track the Convention’s implementation in and by Germany; effectively communicating the results of the Periodic Report. Cultural Diversity 2030: Identifying and cementing positive trends in the areas of gender, digital affairs, inclusion and sustainability, (awareness of) climate change, international development cooperation in the cultural and creative sectors in the spirit of the Convention’s goals.

Annexes

Please upload relevant documents (law, policy, agreement, regulation, strategy, etc.), studies and statistics in PDF format related to the implementation of the 4 goals and the 11 areas of monitoring of the Convention in your country. The documents should have been produced during the reporting period covered by this periodic report. Please provide the title and a description of the main content of the document in English or French.: 

Submission

Designated official signing the report: 
Title: 
Mr.
First name: 
Heiko
Family name: 
Maas
Organization: 
Auswärtiges Amt (Federal Foreign Office)
Position: 
Federal Foreign Minister
Date of submission: 
2020
Electronic Signature: 
-