<
 
 
 
 
×
>
You are viewing an archived web page, collected at the request of United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) using Archive-It. This page was captured on 07:28:01 Dec 16, 2020, and is part of the UNESCO collection. The information on this web page may be out of date. See All versions of this archived page.
Loading media information hide
English Français
© Ana Draskovic / Ana Draskovic

Technical assistance for the conservation of the Group of Monuments at Hampi, India

Situated in an exceptionally beautiful landscape and covering a vast area of 42 km2, Hampi, in India, contains major archaeological remains of what was once the capital of the last great Hindu kingdom and one of the world’s largest cities in the 16th century. Today, it is a living site, with 29 villages and widespread agricultural activity. Hampi is an important Hindu place of pilgrimage. With a growing number of visitors, it has the potential to become one of southern India’s major tourist attractions. The Group of Monuments at Hampi was inscribed on the World Heritage List in 1986. In 1999, the property was added to the World Heritage List in Danger after construction commenced on two suspension bridges that dominated the natural environment and threatened the site’s integrity with numerous trucks crossing the designated perimeter.

Following the recommendations of the joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS mission in February 2000, the Indian authorities made a considerable effort to restore the state of conservation of the property and ensure its conservation and management. Certain vital elements for implementing a management plan were lacking at the time, including cartographic tools to distinguish between zones in which building is permitted or prohibited, a cadastral map, and regulations to monitor and control the construction and restoration work on historic buildings.

It was thus required to develop a long-term technical assistance and partnership. At the request of the national authorities, and in close collaboration with the UNESCO New Delhi Office, the France-UNESCO Cooperation Agreement, with the support of the French Ministry of Culture, provided technical expertise and a French conservation architect (Architecte des bâtiments de France) who assisted Indian authorities regularly from 2003 to 2013. These combined efforts culminated in the removal of the property from the World Heritage List in Danger during the 30th session of the World Heritage Committee (Vilnius, 2006).

This technical assistance was provided whilst the Urban Master Plan was being designed so as to provide intermediary measures. This technical assistance led to a more conscious approach to regional planning which allowed for the formulation of the first elements of an urban development plan. The co-operation allowed for technical exchanges with Indian experts and paved in way for considering architectural and urban morphologies. Likewise, the existing focus on the monumental and archaeological aspects of heritage was enlarged to address concerns relevant to local habitat by means of a pilot study conducted in one of the villages. Landscape preservation was also explored. A technical unit attached to the local authorities was able to gradually assume administrative duties related to the oversight of urban planning permits and provision of architectural advisory services. A pilot study specifically oriented towards an architectural urban and landscape approach was conducted in one of the oldest village.

This cooperation led to fruitful and reciprocal exchanges thanks, in large part, to the close collaboration with the UNESCO New Delhi Office.

Managing regional strategic planning is a main issue for large sites in general. A holistic approach at all management and decision-making levels (national, regional and local) and at different scales is necessary in order to allow for compatible, adapted and controlled development of villages, tourism infrastructure and main infrastructures.

States parties (1)
World Heritage Sites (1)
Documents
Strategic objectives
  • Conservation
Decisions (1)
Show 32COM 7B.70