<
 
 
 
 
×
>
You are viewing an archived web page, collected at the request of United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) using Archive-It. This page was captured on 17:51:46 Mar 17, 2022, and is part of the UNESCO collection. The information on this web page may be out of date. See All versions of this archived page.
Loading media information hide

Building peace in the minds of men and women

UNESCO Global Geoparks (UGGp)

CaoBangUGGp.jpg

© phamngockhoa

New Applications

The following 17 areas have applied in 2021-2022 to be designated UNESCO Global Geopark and have entered the official process of evaluation by UNESCO. In order to enable Member States to exercise their oversight responsibility (as set out in 5.4 Applications review of the Operational Guidelines for UNESCO Global Geoparks, the documents below provide a geological and geographic summary, including a detailed map indicating the location, of each applicant.

According to the Article 5.4 iv of “The Operational Guidelines of the International Geoscience and Geoparks Programme”, adopted by the 38th session of the General Conference of UNESCO, Member States that have concerns about one or more of these new applications have the possibility to send a written objection to the Secretariat until xxxxxx (date to be confirmed with formal notice by ADG/PAX), end of the 3 months grace period.

 

Brazil

Quarta Colônia

P 3

Caçapava

P 5

China

Kanbula

P 8

Wugongshan

P 10

Greece

Nisyros

P 12

Indonesia

Merangin Jambi

P 14

Rajah Ampat

P 16

Iran

Tabas

P 18

Ireland

Joyce Country and Western Lakes

P 20

Italy

Murge (MurGEopark)

P 22

Kyrgyzstan

Teskei

P 24

Mexico

Rutas del Agua

P 26

Norway

Sunnhordland

P 29

Republic of Korea

Busan

P 32

Russian Federation

Undoria

P 34

Spain

Cabo Ortegal

P 37

Costa Quebrada

P 39

 

2021-2022 UNESCO Global Geopark Area Modification Requests

The 4 following areas have expressed the wish to change the size of their existing UNESCO Global Geopark with less than 10%. In order to enable Member States to exercise their oversight responsibility (as set out in 5.6 Applications review of the Operational Guidelines for UNESCO Global Geoparks, the document below provide a geological and geographic summary, including a detailed map indicating the location, of each UNESCO Global Geopark wishing to change its size.

 

4 Area modifications < 10 %

China

Nindge

P 47

Shilin

P 48

Finland

Lauhanvuori Hameenkangas

P 49

Japan

Toya Usu

P 50

 

 

2021-2022 UNESCO Global Geopark Area Modification Requests >10%

The following 2 areas have expressed the wish to change the size of their existing UNESCO Global Geopark with more than 10%. In order to enable Member States to exercise their oversight responsibility (as set out in 5.6 Applications review of the Operational Guidelines for UNESCO Global Geoparks, the documents below provide a geological and geographic summary, including a detailed map indicating the location, of the UNESCO Global Geopark wishing to change its size.

2 Area modifications > 10 %

Chile

Kutralkura

P 43

China

Leye Fengshan

P 45

 

The document with all relevant information: 

​Folder icon Intergovernmental Check 2022

 

Disclaimer

The Secretariat of UNESCO does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement or other information or documentation provided by the States Parties to the Secretariat of UNESCO.

The publication of any such advice, opinion, statement or other information documentation on the website and/or on working documents also does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its boundaries.