<
 
 
 
 
×
>
You are viewing an archived web page, collected at the request of United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) using Archive-It. This page was captured on 05:32:51 Mar 26, 2023, and is part of the UNESCO collection. The information on this web page may be out of date. See All versions of this archived page.
Loading media information hide

Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Archaeological Site of Carthage

Tunisia
Factors affecting the property in 2016*
  • Housing
  • Legal framework
  • Management systems/ management plan
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports

Land development and infrastructures within the property

UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2016

Total amount provided to the property: International Safeguarding Campaign, 1973-1989

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2016
Requests approved: 7 (from 1980-2001)
Total amount approved : 213,315 USD
Missions to the property until 2016**

January 2012: joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2016

On 21 March 2016, the State Party submitted a report on the state of conservation of the property, which is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/37/documents. Progress achieved concerning a certain number of conservation issues raised by the Committee during previous sessions is treated in this report as follows:

  • Despite a difficult political, economic and security context, the operational budget for the Carthage site has been maintained, enabling the acquisition of land in a zone classified in 1985 and to undertake maintenance and conservation work, such as weeding and fire prevention at the Byrsa hill area, reinforced security measures with the installation of cameras and lighting and surveillance patrols and varied conservation work at the amphitheatre at Ibn Chabat and in the Magon quarter;
  • The Punic port has been definitively evacuated of leisure craft and measures taken to prevent any recurrence;
  • Archaeological excavations have continued and new discoveries made in the Tophet zone and preservation excavations are regularly undertaken with the view to obtaining building permits (in the buffer zone of the property), which have on occasion revealed new discoveries;
  • Joint maintenance and conservation actions are implemented with local associations;
  • The report noted issues that still remain to be resolved as regards the management and work in the vicinity of the Antonin Baths, in UNESCO Square, and the museum;
  • In particular, the Protection and Enhancement Plan (PPMV) cannot be completed before the resolution of funding issues resulting from declassification/reclassification (in March 2011) of certain zones within the archaeological site, some built and others not; a commission dedicated to the implementation of the decree for delisting has produced a report relating to land issues;
  • The delimitation of the property resulting from this report is awaiting approval by the Ministry of Equipment.
Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2016

The State Party continues its efforts in the conservation, protection and maintenance of the property and allocates the necessary resources to the property through the acquisition of land of archaeological importance, the evacuation of abusive craft from the Punic port and preventive security and fire protection measures, despite a difficult political and economic context; the involvement of civil society reinforces these actions.

The management of public areas such as the UNESCO Square and the vicinity of the Antonin Baths remain unresolved in order to control the informal increase of commercial shops in the framework of an integrated management plan for the property. However, land issues linked to the declassification/reclassification of certain zones of the site continue to constitute an obstacle for the definition of the boundary of the inscribed site and its buffer zone, and the adoption and application of the PPMV. Moreover, the issues concerning the buildings already built in the declassified/reclassified zones have considerable environmental, financial and social implications that would be important to evaluate and clarify. It is recommended that the Committee urge the State Party to undertake pragmatic solutions and rapidly adopt the boundary of the property and its buffer zone, including the criteria used to define the buffer zone, regulations and measures that govern it and the provisions undertaken for its management and adopt the PPMV. The protection of the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of Carthage greatly depends on the implementation of an archaeological and conservation strategy, the preparation of an enhancement plan and a tourism management plan, the coordination of management and preservation tools for the property and the coordination of the roles of the different actors concerned, as requested by the World Heritage Committee.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2016
40 COM 7B.29
Archaeological Site of Carthage (Tunisia) (C 37)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision 38 COM 7B.6, adopted at its 38th session (Doha, 2014),
  3. Congratulates the State Party for the efforts undertaken in the protection and conservation of the property, including the acquisition of archaeological land and the evacuation of the Punic port of abusive craft, despite a difficult political, security and financial situation, and encourages the pursuit of its efforts regarding this issue;
  4. Requests the State Party to provide the World Heritage Centre with a summary report on the results of the archaeological excavations and the possible plans concerning their conservation and enhancement;
  5. Strongly urges the State Party to resolve the land issues relating to the declassification/reclassification of certain archaeological zones within the property that prevent the conservation and the sustainable management of the property, considering the environmental and social impact of the adopted solutions;
  6. Also reiterates its invitation to the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre a proposal for the modification of the boundaries according to the procedure indicated in Paragraphs 163-165 of the Operational Guidelines and recommends that the said proposal concerns the establishment of a buffer zone, as well as a modification to the boundaries of the property inscribed aiming to align them with the national boundaries, as requested by the joint 2012 World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission;
  7. Invites the State Party to provide information on the criteria employed to define the buffer zone, and the governing regulations and measures for the protection and integrity of the property and the provisions taken for its management;
  8. Further reiterates its request to the State Party to :
    1. Adopt and implement the Protection and Presentation Plan (PPMV) for the property,
    2. Prepare an Enhancement Plan and a Tourism Management Plan preventing the uncontrolled proliferation of commercial concerns within the property, in particular at the UNESCO Square and in the vicinity of the Anthonin Baths,
    3. Conceive and implement an Archaeological and Conservation Strategy for the property,
    4. Coordinate management and conservation tools for the property as well as the roles of the different actors concerned;
  9. Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2017, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 42nd session in 2018.
Draft Decision: 40 COM 7B.29

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision 38 COM 7B.6, adopted at its 38th session (Doha, 2014),
  3. Congratulates the State Party for the efforts undertaken in the protection and conservation of the property, including the acquisition of archaeological land and the evacuation of the Punic port of abusive craft, despite a difficult political, security and financial situation, and encourages the pursuit of its efforts regarding this issue;
  4. Requests the State Party to provide the World Heritage Centre with a summary report on the results of the archaeological excavations and the possible plans concerning their conservation and enhancement;
  5. Strongly urges the State Party to resolve the land issues relating to the declassification/reclassification of certain archaeological zones within the property that prevent the conservation and the sustainable management of the property, considering the environmental and social impact of the adopted solutions;
  6. Also reiterates its invitation to the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre a proposal for the modification of the boundaries according to the procedure indicated in Paragraphs 163-165 of the Operational Guidelines and recommends that the said proposal concerns the establishment of a buffer zone, as well as a modification to the boundaries of the property inscribed aiming to align them with the national boundaries, as requested by the joint 2012 World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission;
  7. Invites the State Party to provide information on the criteria employed to define the buffer zone, and the governing regulations and measures for the protection and integrity of the property and the provisions taken for its management;
  8. Further reiterates its request to the State Party to :
    1. Adopt and implement the Protection and Presentation Plan (PPMV) for the property,
    2. Prepare an Enhancement Plan and a Tourism Management Plan preventing the uncontrolled proliferation of commercial concerns within the property, in particular at the UNESCO Square and in the vicinity of the Anthonin Baths,
    3. Conceive and implement an Archaeological and Conservation Strategy for the property,
    4. Coordinate management and conservation tools for the property as well as the roles of the different actors concerned;
    5. Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2017, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 42nd session in 2018.
Report year: 2016
Tunisia
Date of Inscription: 1979
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (ii)(iii)(vi)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2016) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 40COM (2016)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top