<
 
 
 
 
×
>
You are viewing an archived web page, collected at the request of United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) using Archive-It. This page was captured on 17:31:19 Apr 01, 2023, and is part of the UNESCO collection. The information on this web page may be out of date. See All versions of this archived page.
Loading media information hide

Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Forts and Castles, Volta, Greater Accra, Central and Western Regions

Ghana
Factors affecting the property in 2019*
  • Erosion and siltation/ deposition
  • Housing
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Water (rain/water table)
  • Wind
  • Other Threats:

    Salt-laden atmosphere

Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Erosion (issue resolved in 1998 but significant again in 2019)
  • Housing (issue resolved in 1998 but significant again in 2019)
  • Management systems/ management plan (issue resolved in 1998 but significant again in 2019)
  • Heavy rain (issue resolved in 1998 but significant again in 2019)
  • Wind (issue resolved in 1998 but significant again in 2019)
  • Salt-laden atmosphere (issue resolved in 1998 but significant again in 2019)
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2019
Total amount granted: USD 26,770 provided in 2007 by the Australia Trust Fund for the project "Cleaning Ussher Fort ; USD 49,261 received in 2007 by the European Commission for the project "External Works for the Restoration and Redevelopment of Parts of Ussher Fort"
International Assistance: requests for the property until 2019
Requests approved: 3 (from 1995-2018)
Total amount approved : 145,086 USD
Missions to the property until 2019**
April/May 2019: Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Advisory mission
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2019

On 15 March 2019, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report, which is available at http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/34/documents/, and reports the following:

  • The property’s protection status and management authority, the Ghana Museums and Monuments Board (GMMB), have been confirmed;
  • Progress in addressing previous recommendations of the World Heritage Committee adopted in 1998 (CONF 203 VII.35) is indicated, as follows:
    • Two components previously used as prisons have been decommissioned and transferred to GMMB,
    • Cadastral surveys for some components will be undertaken, including the identification of property boundaries and buffer zones, as well as the preparation of title deeds,
    • The State Party intends to delineate buffer zones of 0.2 ha, but this depends on the availability of the surrounding land,
    • Activities to sensitize local communities and create awareness about the need to preserve heritage sites has been included in the 2019 work plan for GMMB,
    • Discussions on the sustainable use of the property are to include local communities;
  • Some of the concerns raised by the Committee in 1998 about threats to the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) still persist and are now more significant, including environmental degradation, lack of buffer zones, development pressure and lack of funding for regular maintenance and conservation works. The GMMB has not yet prepared an Emergency Request for urgent conservation works, as requested by the Committee in 1998.  Other concerns are inadequate training and the lack of disaster risk management plans, though the State Party reports that the latter are to be prepared next year;
  • A summary of the condition of most components in 2018 is presented, which notes no change since 1998;
  • The preparation of the property Management Plan, supported with International Assistance funding, will commence soon. The Plan is scheduled to be completed by April 2020;
  • A project for the restoration, reconstruction and adaptive re-use of Fort Amsterdam is to commence in March or early April 2019. The preliminary assessment and architectural documentation have been prepared, and European Union funding has been secured;
  • Information is included about a proposed "Elmina Heritage Bay" tourism development project at St. George's Castle in Elmina, noting that preliminary documentation has been submitted to the World Heritage Centre;
  • A 2015 survey was undertaken at James Fort in advance of restoration work, and a further structural investigation is to be undertaken subject to funding being obtained.
Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2019

The State Party is aware of the threats to the property and is making some progress on a range of issues to improve its state of conservation. This includes development of the Management Plan, identification of boundaries and buffer zones, community awareness and disaster risk management plans.

However, with regard to threats, many have existed since at least 1998, and their increasing significance is a matter of concern. Recent heavy rains in Accra underscore the environmental pressures on the property. There are indications that some components are impacted by abandonment, the accelerated degradation of structures and the potential or actual disappearance of ruins. Several of the components comprising partial structures and traces of former fortifications might no longer exist.

The anticipated progress with the development of a Management Plan is a positive step. This should consider the current lack of effective site management for most components, as well as identified threats. At present, some level of protection and management is only available for the three large forts. The other forts are mostly abandoned, with accelerated degradation due to rising salts and humidity, lack of effective management, and the possibility of climate change impacts.

The steps taken to establish buffer zones for the property are welcome. However, the persisting absence of buffer zones may represent a particular threat as possible future large scale projects in and around the property's components, such as in Elmina and at Fort Amsterdam (see below), cannot take into account the necessary measures that would respect the protective provisions provided by these buffer zones. The delineation of a buffer zone of an adequate size for each component and the development of effective protection regimes is therefore of utmost urgency.

With regard to the "Elmina Heritage Bay" tourism development project at St. George's Castle in Elmina, the World Heritage Centre sent a letter to the State Party in October 2018, in line with Paragraph 174 of the Operational Guidelines, requesting further information on this project. On the basis of the material then submitted to the World Heritage Centre by the State Party in December 2018, a preliminary assessment was carried out, indicating potential negative impact on the property.

The works at Fort Amsterdam will involve the restoration and reconstruction of damaged areas of the fort and its subsequent adaptive re-use. The State Party reports that discussions regarding the project have been underway since 2003, but as already for the "Elmina Heritage Bay", it is regrettable that no prior information was submitted to the World Heritage Centre in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines, before notification in the State Party’s report.

The State Party invited a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Advisory mission to visit the property from 28 April to 2 May 2019 to assess restoration and development projects at the two components of Fort Amsterdam and St. George's Castle (Elmina) in addition to the arrangements made to commence the preparation of the Management Plan. The mission report will be available at http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/34/documents/ before the 43rd session of the World Heritage Committee and its results shared in advance with the Committee.

Given the range, longevity and significance of issues facing the property, it is recommended that a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Reactive Monitoring mission be carried out in early 2020 to consider the state of conservation of all the components of the property and the potential threats they are facing, the implementation of the recommendations from the Advisory mission, potential projects proposed, and progress with the delineation of buffer zones and the development of the Management Plan.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2019
43 COM 7B.106
Forts and Castles, Volta, Greater Accra, Central and Western Regions (Ghana) (C 34)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/19/43.COM/7B.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision CONF 203 VII.35, adopted its 22nd session (Kyoto, 1998),
  3. Requests the State Party to ensure that the proposed Management Plan considers the current lack of effective site management for the majority of the property’s components, as well as identified threats;
  4. Reiterates its request to the State Party to progress, as a matter of urgency, with the delineation of a buffer zone for each component and protection regimes;
  5. Welcomes the State Party’s invitation of a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Advisory mission to assess restoration works and development projects at St. George's Castle at Elmina and Fort Amsterdam, and also requests the State Party to halt all projects until the recommendations of the mission have been addressed;
  6. Takes note of the recommendations of the 2019 Advisory mission and invites the State Party to start implementing them with no delay;
  7. Further requests the State Party to invite a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Reactive Monitoring mission to the property in early 2020 to assess the state of conservation of all the components of the property and the potential threats they are facing, the implementation of the recommendations of the Advisory mission, and progress in the delineation and protection of buffer zones and preparation of the Management Plan;
  8. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2020, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 44th session in 2020.
Draft Decision: 43 COM 7B.106

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/19/43.COM/7B.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision CONF 203 VII.35, adopted its 22nd session (Kyoto, 1998),
  3. Requests the State Party to ensure that the proposed Management Plan considers the current lack of effective site management for the majority of the property’s components, as well as identified threats;
  4. Reiterates its request to the State Party to progress, as a matter of urgency, with the delineation of a buffer zone for each component and protection regimes;
  5. Welcomes the State Party’s invitation of a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Advisory mission to assess restoration works and development projects at St. George's Castle at Elmina and Fort Amsterdam, and also requests the State Party to halt all projects until the recommendations of the mission have been addressed ;
  6. Takes note of the recommendations of the 2019 Advisory mission and invites the State Party to start implementing them with no delay;
  7. Further requests the State Party to invite a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Reactive Monitoring mission to the property in early 2020 to assess the state of conservation of all the components of the property and the potential threats they are facing, the implementation of the recommendations of the Advisory mission, and progress in the delineation and protection of buffer zones and preparation of the Management Plan;
  8. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2020, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 44th session in 2020.
Report year: 2019
Ghana
Date of Inscription: 1979
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (vi)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2019) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 43COM (2019)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top