State of Conservation
33
Reports
11
Properties
11
States Parties
Threats* :
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Input of excess energy |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Input of excess energy |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Input of excess energy |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Input of excess energy |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Input of excess energy |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Input of excess energy |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Input of excess energy |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Input of excess energy |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Input of excess energy |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Input of excess energy |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Input of excess energy |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Input of excess energy |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B.Add |
Threats*: | Input of excess energy |
Other Threats: | Brucella infection threat to bison population |
Properties
Categories
Regions
States Parties
Argentina Brazil Germany Lao People's Democratic Republic Malta Morocco Nepal Peru United States of America Zambia ZimbabweThreats
Input of excess energy (33)
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.