FIDC I Résultats du dernier cycle

Project ID: 2022-9281

Nom du demandeur :

Department of Culture

Pays du demandeur:

Lesotho

Type de demandeur:

Party

Montant demandé:

99.810,00USD

Pays bénéficiaire(s):

Lesotho

Statut:

Non Recommended

Note totale: 21

IFCD Submissions details

Présélection | Formulaire d'examen de la Commission nationale

IFCD Preselection form - - 07/15/2022 - 11:47

Submitted by on 15 juil 2022

1. Nom et coordonnées du responsable de la Commission nationale pour l’UNESCO

Titre:

Nom:

Seala

Prénom:

'Mabafokeng

Fonction:

Programme coodinator-Culture

Adresse:

P.O.Box 47

Code postal:

100

Ville:

Maseru

Courriel:

matsooana7@yahoo.com

2. Justification de présélection

Quelles sont les raisons principales qui ont motivé la présélection de ce projet en comparaison avec d’autres propositions reçues par la Commission nationale pour l’UNESCO ?:

- This project proposal is the strongest of the two submitted by the country, it also aims to respond to one of the needs of mapping the sector.

3. L'institution/organisation demandeuse

Quels éléments montrent que l’institution/organisation demandeuse est une partie prenante importante du secteur de la culture (aux niveaux local / national / international) ?:

The applicant here is the State's ministry responsible for the implementation of the culture conventions, which makes it a key stakeholder locally, nationally and internationally.

4. Pertinence de la proposition de projet présélectionnée

4.1. Quels sont actuellement les principaux besoins et priorités de votre pays en termes de politiques culturelles et/ou d’industries culturelles ?:

We need - A more relevant Cultural policy that speaks to the contemporary needs for the growth of this industry. - A user friendly implementation plan that speaks to the National Cultural policy - Monitoring and evaluation strategy - Marketing and promotions for the culture and creative industries - Arts Council that will oversee the implementation of all the above with the support of the responsible Ministry

4.2. De quelle manière les objectifs de cette proposition de projet présélectionnée répondent-ils aux besoins et aux priorités actuelles du pays en termes de politiques et/ou d’industries culturelles ?:

The project's objectives will meet one of the needs we have with regards to the database and the statistics that serves as evidence of the situation on the ground. Availability of data in different forms will help in understanding and identifying gaps in the industry

4.3. Dans quelle mesure pensez-vous que cette proposition de projet présélectionnée aura un impact sur les politiques et/ou industries culturelles du pays ?:

The project will be able to collect data that will help understand the state of creative industry; it will enhance the statistical data that the sector/ other stakeholders needs to have more informed approach, engagement and plans. Most local and regional applicants need statistical data to be able to have measurable indicators based on real state situation than assumptions.

5. Autres informations

Veuillez indiquer d’autres informations contextuelles que le Groupe d’experts du FIDC devrait prendre en considération lors de l’évaluation du projet.:

As a country, even though we are more than 10 years on after the ratification of the 2005 Convection, we are still at an initial stage with regard to the understanding the appreciation of the creative industry and its importance in over all development. There is need for an in-depth study and profiling of the industry. This proposal is part of the learning process with regard to the fund for our stakeholders.

6. The pre-selection process at the national level

Sehloho Soole

Nom:

Sehloho Soole

Organisation:

Ministry of Small Business Development, Cooperatives and Marketing

Type d’Organisation/Institution:

Partie

Poste:

Chief Commercial Manager

Mpho Letima

Nom:

Mpho Letima

Organisation:

GEM

Type d’Organisation/Institution:

ONG

Poste:

Founder and Director

Pusetso Nyabela

Nom:

Pusetso Nyabela

Organisation:

Morija Museum and Archives

Type d’Organisation/Institution:

ONG

Poste:

Director

Date:

2022

En tant que signature, entrez le nom complet du représentant de la Commission nationale ::

'Mabafokeng M. Seala

IFCD Submissions details

Recevabilité | Examen technique

IFCD Eligibility form - - 09/29/2022 - 15:47

Submitted by on 29 sep 2022

Statut recevabilité:

Eligible

Examen Technique

Le formulaire de demande a été soumis avant la date limite:

Yes

Formulaire de demande soumis en français ou anglais:

Yes

Le montant maximum demandé est inférieur ou égal à $E.U. 100.000:

Yes

La période de mise en œuvre du projet se situe entre 12 et 24 mois:

Yes

Toutes les sections du formulaire ont été complétées:

Yes

Signature du demandeur:

Yes

Le demandeur n'a pas un projet financé par le FIDC en cours:

Yes

Le projet s’inscrit dans les domaines d'intervention du FIDC:

Yes

SI PARTIE OU ONG

Pays en développement Parties à la Convention de 2005:

Yes

Formulaire d’examen de la Commission nationale:

Yes

Signature de la Commission nationale:

Yes

Document officiel / Statuts (avec traduction anglaise ou française si nécessaire):

Yes

IFCD Submissions details

Évaluation des experts

GRILLE D’ÉVALUATION
8 points	La proposition de projet répond parfaitement à tous les aspects pertinents du critère considéré. La réponse fournit toutes les informations nécessaires et il n'y a pas d’identification de lacunes.
6-7 points	La proposition de projet répond bien au critère, même si certaines améliorations pourraient être apportées. La réponse donne des informations claires sur la totalité ou la quasi-totalité des éléments de preuves nécessaires.
5-4 points	La proposition de projet répond largement au critère, mais il y a encore quelques lacunes. La réponse donne des informations pertinentes, mais il reste encore des zones et des éléments d’information à éclaircir.
3-2 points	La proposition de projet ne répond pas entièrement au critère ou ne peut pas être jugée correctement en raison d'informations manquantes ou incomplètes. La réponse ne traite pas nécessairement la question posée ou donne très peu d'informations pertinentes.
1 point	La proposition de projet aborde à peine le critère. Il y a un manque si évident d'informations pertinentes qu’il est extrêmement difficile de juger si la question posée est traitée.
0 points	La proposition de projet ne répond pas au critère ou ne peut pas être évaluée en raison du manque d'informations pertinentes. La réponse ne traite pas la question posée ou ne fournit pas d’informations pertinentes.

Expert 1

Sub-Total Expert 1 : 10

IFCD Expert Evaluation form - - 10/16/2022 - 21:25

Submitted by on 16 oct 2022

Résume bref du projet:

The project Mapping of the Cultural Creative industries in Lesotho focuses on mapping the status of CCIs in the country, especially in audiovisual, performing arts and design, covering 10 districts of Lesotho. The project is extended for two years and the applicant is the Ministry of Tourism Environment and Culture through the Department of Culture and Planning Unit. There are two major partners envisaged - the Bureau of Statistics and the Lesotho Copyright Society of Authors and Artists (LESCOSAA). The requested amount is 99 810 USD and there is self-funding by the Ministry at the amount of 35 790 USD.

1. PERTINENCE ET ADÉQUATION DU PROJET AUX OBJECTIFS STRATÉGIQUES ET DOMAINES D'INTERVENTION DU FIDC

1.1 Veuillez décrire comment les objectifs et impacts/ bénéfices à long terme du projet correspondent à, au moins, l’un des objectifs stratégiques du FIDC et ses effets escomptés associés. :

The project objectives are in general in line with IFCD areas of intervention as the project focuses on the mapping of CCIs and establishing of strategy that encourages investments and public-private cooperation. The project also aims at improving cross-sectoral cooperation in cultural policy-making, which corresponds to another IFCD priority. There is a goodwill to focus on processes and mechanisms for public policy-making through the involvement of the civil society, although this objective is not clearly formulated.

1.2 Comment les objectifs de cette proposition répondent-ils aux besoins et priorités actuels du pays/ de la région en termes de politiques culturelles et/ou d’industries culturelles ? :

The project meets broadly the needs of the country and fills the gap that the CCI sector is not organized and is not documented. A large part of the CCIs sector in Lesotho is operating in informal groups, and there are no records. The sector is poorly organized and without sufficient resources. On another hand, the local needs are not initially researched, and there is little evidence that the project will meet the needs of the 10 districts, involved in the mapping and documentation.

1.3 Dans quelle mesure les objectifs du projet sont-ils spécifiques et mesurables ?:

The two objectives, formulated in the project’s framework, are elaborated very broadly without specific and measurable indicators. The objective to develop and implement a National Framework for Cultural Creative Industries Statistic is something needed, although it is not specific enough to be able to monitor the progress. The second objective is even broader, related to informing policy-makers and encouraging investment opportunities in Lesotho’s CCIs, although it is not sufficiently clear in what way this would happen.

1.4 Dans quelle mesure le projet contribue-t-il à la promotion de l’égalité des genres, à l’autonomisation des jeunes, à la coopération Sud-Sud et Nord-Sud-Sud et/ou à la participation de divers groupes sociaux dans le cadre des domaines d’intervention du FIDC ? :

The project does not refer to South-South or North-South-South cooperation(only that there is a consultant from South Africa to be invited to the project’s implementation). It is mentioned that some groups are often excluded from policy making such as women, girls, youth and other marginalized groups, but the project does not elaborate on how these groups will be involved in this specific project.

Score:

2. FAISABILITÉ DU PROJET, AINSI QUE LA PERTINENCE ET L'EFFICACITÉ DE SES MODALITÉS D'EXÉCUTION

2.1 Quels éléments démontrent la capacité organisationnelle du demandeur (principales activités de l’institution/organisation) et sa compétence (qualifications et expérience du personnel) à mettre en œuvre le plan de travail et à gérer le budget ?:

The main applicant – the Ministry of Tourism, Environment and Culture, has the organizational capacity to undertake a project of such scale. The issue is that the team consists of 13 people with not very well explained roles. For example, there are 5 project coordinators, and there is no sufficiently competent team to undertake the research and the mapping, as well as the strategy development, which are at the core of the project.

2.2 Dans quelle mesure les activités répondent-elles aux questions pertinentes ? Veuillez expliquer comment la méthodologie est appropriée à la réalisation des objectifs ? :

The overall methodology of the mapping, data collection and strategy development is not clear. It is also not specified in what way the CCIs sector will be involved in the process. The methods to undertake the mapping are unclear. The engagement of a local consultant to design a national cultural policy implementation plan is also not sufficiently specified. It is not clarified in what way the data collectors will be organized and what are the methods to collect the data from all CCIs in the country in the respective branches. The objectives are written broadly and there is an absence of a specific methodology for how they will be achieved.

2.3 Dans quelle mesure le calendrier est-il réaliste et cohérent avec les activités ?:

The project’s time frame is extended to two years (1/6/2023 to 31/5/2025), but as the activities are not identified with qualitative indicators, it is not convincing to what extent this time frame is realistic.

2.4 Les bénéficiaires directs et indirects du projet ont-ils été clairement identifiés ? Dans quelle mesure les activités sont-elles pertinentes pour les bénéficiaires ciblés et répondent-elles à leurs besoins ? :

The direct and indirect beneficiaries are not split based on the project’s activities and are elaborated very broadly. For example, the direct beneficiaries are identified as CCIs (Design, audio-visual, performing arts, Department of Culture and Bureau of Statistics, Development Planning, and Lesotho Copyright Society of Authors and Artists. There are no qualitative indicators attached to these direct beneficiaries based on activities to be undertaken. The indirect beneficiaries are also the same group for all activities and related to Technical and Vocational Education and Training, Basotho Enterprise Development Corporation, Ministry of Trade and Lesotho Tourism Development cooperation. It is not clarified in what way this target group is related to the project’s activities. Also, the outputs/deliverables are not coherently connected with the needs of the beneficiaries. There is an absence of initial need analysis too.

Score:

3. GESTION ET RESPONSABILITÉ FINANCIÈRES

3.1 Le budget prévoit-il des ressources adéquates (salaires, honoraires, matériel, voyages, communication, etc.) nécessaires à la réussite du projet ? Si le budget a été surestimé ou sous-estimé, veuillez expliquer de quelle manière. :

The requested amount for undertaking this project is 99 810 USD. Several budget items are not sufficiently justified. It is not clear why there is a need for cartage for printers (2 520 USD), why there is a need for brander t-shirt and floppy hats for data collectors. There are budget items for publications, but it is not clear what kind of publications are planned – there is no elaboration on this in the project outcomes and the project framework. The budget item for facilitation and monitoring allowance at the amount of 25 560 USD is also not justified and not clear in the project framework.

3.2 Quelle part du budget est allouée aux activités du projet par rapport aux frais généraux ? Le budget semble-t-il adéquat et les frais généraux ont-ils été estimés conformément à la limite maximum de 30% du budget total du projet ? :

The overhead costs are low – 100$, which is much below the limit.

3.3 La proposition de projet indique-t-elle des contributions financières supplémentaires au projet, telles que des co-financements et/ou de l’auto-financement ? :

There is a self-contribution by the ministry at the amount of 35 790 USD, which is positive.

3.4 Quelles sont les actions prévues pour assurer la responsabilité financière (par exemple, l’implication d’un directeur financier) ? :

The Ministry has a system of financial statements and reporting. The financial plan is that the UNESCO grant will be transferred into the account of the Lesotho National Commission for UNESCO, and there is no clarification why is this needed while the Department of Culture uses integrated financial management information for financial operations and reporting.

Score :

4. EFFICACITÉ DES RÉSULTATS ET LIVRABLES DU PROJET

4.1 Les résultats et/ou livrables du projet sont-ils concrets, mesurables et réalistes ? Dans quelle mesure permettront-ils d’atteindre les objectifs du projet?:

The envisaged outputs/deliverables of the project are the National Framework for CCIs, National Data Framework for CCIs and the reviewed Cultural policy. These deliverables do not have specific quantitative and qualitative indicators and the means of verification are elaborated broadly. The connection between deliverables and objectives is very blurred, because both are not specifically defined.

4.2 Dans quelle mesure les activités principales et le budget sont-ils pertinents et adaptés à la réalisation des résultats et/ou livrables énoncés ?:

There is no sufficiently elaborated connection between key activities and budget items that also corresponds well to the intended outputs. This is because the activities and outputs are elaborated broadly without specific quantitative indicators that can form the budget items in a coherent way.

4.3 Dans quelle mesure est-il prévu que ce projet ait un impact ou des bénéfices à long terme sur les politiques culturelles et/ou les industries culturelles du pays/ de la région ?:

There is a general wish that the project will have an impact on cultural policy and cultural industries in the country, but there is no specific evidence of how would this happen.

4.4 Dans quelle mesure le projet démontre-t-il un potentiel de changement structurel (par exemple : changements dans l’environnement politique ; changements fondamentaux des structures organisationnelles publiques et professionnelles ; et changements dans la gestion du gouvernement et des autorités réglementaires) ? :

The project has a good intention to improve the policy environment through the data collection, mapping and documentation of CCIs in the country, although this connection is not proven well in the project’s framework. The potential for structural change and change in the regulatory environment as a result of the project is not sufficiently demonstrated in the project.

Score:

5. DURABILITÉ

5.1 Dans quelle mesure des employés contractuels et des partenaires sont-ils impliqués dans la mise en œuvre des activités du projet ? Le rôle de chaque employé contractuel et/ou partenaire a-t-il été clairement décrit ?:

There are two key partners in the project – the Bureau of Statistics will lead the mapping exercise and the Lesotho Copyright Society of Authors and Artists (LESCOSAA) will help identify data gaps and data sources within the sector. It will also assist in compiling and analyzing copyright and creative industries data. Nevertheless, it is not clear who are the professionals to collect data, what would be the specific role of the international and local consultants, and how the CCI organisations and creatives are going to be involved in the process.

5.2 Comment le projet se rattache-t-il et/ou complète-t-il le travail déjà en cours dans le pays/la région en termes de politiques et/ou d’industries culturelles ? :

The project is a continuation of previously completed work on case studies in the CCI sectors, and other policy-related work done by the Ministry. There is a complementarity of activities and objectives.

5.3 Quelles mesures/démarches sont proposées afin d’assurer une réponse aux impacts/bénéfices à long terme du projet?:

There is an intention to elaborate a tool for collecting and analyzing data, although there are no sufficient details and explanations on what this tool/method is and in what way the mapping will benefit the long-term development of the policy environment.

5.4 Quelles mesures/démarches sont proposées pour le suivi du projet avec ses bénéficiaires après son achèvement ? :

There is an intention that the Department of Culture, Bureau of Statistics, LESCOSAA, will maintain further the training of trainers model, but there are no clear steps or measures on how would this be organised. There are no specific steps on how the gathered data and results of the mapping will be maintained and updated further after the project is completed. The project beneficiaries, as already mentioned, are elaborated broadly and there are no certain methods on how they would continue being involved in the project. The sustainability of the project is not sufficiently proven.

Score:

Évaluation globale:

The project is important and actual for the country’s CCIs development and broadly corresponds to IFCDs areas of intervention. Nevertheless, the objectives are formulated broadly and are not SMART. The methodology for collecting data and the overall mapping is not clarified. The methods of research and the one for the elaboration of the strategic document are also not clear. There is no need analysis initially performed in the 10 districts of Lesotho. It is not specified why the mapping will cover mainly audiovisual, performing arts and design. The mapping does not involve sufficiently the creatives from the CCIs sectors and the beneficiaries, both direct and indirect, are elaborated broadly without specificities. The project has key partners, although the role of the data collectors and researchers to be involved in the project is not sufficiently clarified. Several key budget items do not match well the project’s activities. The Ministry who is the applicant has a financial system for monitoring and reporting. The impact of the project on policy-making and structural changes is a good wish, but not sufficiently proven by specific actions. The sustainability of the project is not sufficiently proven, as it is not clear how and who will maintain the data and will update them after the project is completed. Specific actions/steps to continue keeping in contact with beneficiaries after the project lifetime, are not clear.

Expert 2

Sub-Total Expert 2 : 11

IFCD Expert Evaluation form - a_wangusa - 10/27/2022 - 22:22

Submitted by a_wangusa on 27 oct 2022

Résume bref du projet:

The project aims to explore and map the status of Lesotho`s Creative and Cultural Industries in particular the audio visual, performing arts and design in order to understand and define the nature of CCIs available in the country. While the CCIs have become one of the most dynamic sectors in the world economy and international trade; Lesotho has not yet able to fully harness the potential of its creative economies to create jobs, increase revenues, and export earnings. Part of the major challenge to Lesotho CCIs is that the sector the sector is neither well documented and nor organised. Therefore the project seeks to redress the problem by mapping and documenting the status of CCIs in Lesotho. It aims to raise awareness on the role played by the 2005 UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expression on the development, promotion and protection of the CCIs in Lesotho. Furthermore, the project will use UNESCO`s conceptual framework as an international standardized framework appropriate and applicable in defining and understanding CCIs. The project is envisaged to subsequently contribute to a foundation and strategies through which the country can start on towards the development and promotion of the sector with a clear overview of what/ which kind of CCIs exist in Lesotho. The project will cover ten districts of Lesotho and is envisaged to take a period of two years and will be implemented by the Ministry of Tourism Environment and Culture through the Department of Culture and Planning Unit in collaboration with Bureau of Statistics and Lesotho Copyright Society of Authors and Artists (LESCOSAA).

1. PERTINENCE ET ADÉQUATION DU PROJET AUX OBJECTIFS STRATÉGIQUES ET DOMAINES D'INTERVENTION DU FIDC

ER 1.1. Cross-sectoral cooperation in cultural policy making and implementation is demonstrated The Department of Culture’s coorperation with the Ministry of Finance will enable the development and implementation of policies that support inclusive economic growth. It will also mobilise and allocate financial resources accordingly. While the Lesotho Revenue Authority will assist with assessment and effective revenue collection of CCIs. ER 1.2. Processes and mechanisms for public policy making and implementation are strengthened: Policies specific to subsectors of culture and heritage will be developed, a case in point is a framework on film and music performing arts and its impact on investments the same applies to television and radio. Copyright, intellectual property and digital regime will be reviewed. ER 1.3. The role of civil society in cultural policy making and implementation is strengthened: The Department of Culture will continue to engage a diverse set of civil society organisations in research and policymaking decisions

1.2 Comment les objectifs de cette proposition répondent-ils aux besoins et priorités actuels du pays/ de la région en termes de politiques culturelles et/ou d’industries culturelles ? :

Over the years, Lesotho has lost many artists trying to make a living and obligated to accept their work being waned. This is one of the diﬃculties which many artists have been experiencing during Lesotho's continued talent drain. The prevailing scenario in the CCIs in Lesotho calls for necessary intervention. As a result, this project intends to explore the status of the CCIs in Lesotho in order to understand the nature of the CCIs in the sector as the government is working towards their development.

1.3 Dans quelle mesure les objectifs du projet sont-ils spécifiques et mesurables ?:

The objectives are not specific and measurable

The project is not specific to gender, youth or South-South and North-South-South cooperation

Score:

2. FAISABILITÉ DU PROJET, AINSI QUE LA PERTINENCE ET L'EFFICACITÉ DE SES MODALITÉS D'EXÉCUTION

The Department of Culture’s mission is to -Safeguard Lesotho`s arts, culture and heritage as a unique national identity that evokes a strong sense of pride, patriotism and contributor to economic growth among Basotho.

2.2 Dans quelle mesure les activités répondent-elles aux questions pertinentes ? Veuillez expliquer comment la méthodologie est appropriée à la réalisation des objectifs ? :

The project will engage a consultant to do data collection; also come up with an implementation plan for the CCI policy.

2.3 Dans quelle mesure le calendrier est-il réaliste et cohérent avec les activités ?:

The project is a two-year project, which is realistic for a mapping study.

Yes Direct CCIs (Design, audio-visual, performing arts, Department of Culture and Bureau of Statistics, Development Planning, and Lesotho Copyright Society of Authors and Artists. Ministry of finance. Ministry of Small business Indirect Technical and Vocational Education and Training, Basotho Enterprise Development Corporation, Ministry of Trade and Lesotho Tourism Development cooperation.

Score:

3. GESTION ET RESPONSABILITÉ FINANCIÈRES

Overheads costs of $100 seem too low to cover courier services of the project

Overheads is minimal

3.3 La proposition de projet indique-t-elle des contributions financières supplémentaires au projet, telles que des co-financements et/ou de l’auto-financement ? :

Yes. Co-funding of $35,790

3.4 Quelles sont les actions prévues pour assurer la responsabilité financière (par exemple, l’implication d’un directeur financier) ? :

As per the Procurement Regulations of 2009, the Department of Culture is required to report all resources received from partners like UNESCO and the implementation status of all projects to the Ministry of Development Planning and other statutory bodies such as the parliament. Accountant General provides the ministry with charts of accounts which are the guiding tools for standard preparations and reporting of financial statements. For this project, all funds from UNESCO will be transferred into the account of the Lesotho National Commission for UNESCO

Score :

4. EFFICACITÉ DES RÉSULTATS ET LIVRABLES DU PROJET

4.1 Les résultats et/ou livrables du projet sont-ils concrets, mesurables et réalistes ? Dans quelle mesure permettront-ils d’atteindre les objectifs du projet?:

The outputs are not measurable and it difficult to access if they are likely to achieve the objectives of the project

4.2 Dans quelle mesure les activités principales et le budget sont-ils pertinents et adaptés à la réalisation des résultats et/ou livrables énoncés ?:

The activities and budget are relevant and appropriate and can lead to the intended outputs

4.3 Dans quelle mesure est-il prévu que ce projet ait un impact ou des bénéfices à long terme sur les politiques culturelles et/ou les industries culturelles du pays/ de la région ?:

The CCI statistics will inform policy implementation

The project demonstrates structural change in terms of generating data that will inform planning and attracting investment

Score:

5. DURABILITÉ

The role of partners and contractors is clear

5.2 Comment le projet se rattache-t-il et/ou complète-t-il le travail déjà en cours dans le pays/la région en termes de politiques et/ou d’industries culturelles ? :

The project does don’t indicate other ongoing projects that project will complement

5.3 Quelles mesures/démarches sont proposées afin d’assurer une réponse aux impacts/bénéfices à long terme du projet?:

The government of Lesotho through the National Strategic Development Plan 11 (NSDP 11) has put culture and creative industries as priority sector that can lead to the economic growth. Therefore, the Department of Culture will ensure that the budget is allocated for the creative sector to maintain its viability.

5.4 Quelles mesures/démarches sont proposées pour le suivi du projet avec ses bénéficiaires après son achèvement ? :

Periodic reporting keep on working with stakeholders in classifying and clustering the CCIs as they grow. A better understanding of the variations will help to make a more persuasive case to policy makers.

Score:

Évaluation globale:

The project aims to explore and map the status of Lesotho`s Creative and Cultural Industries in particular the audio visual, performing arts and design in order to understand and define the nature of Culture and Creative Industries (CCIs) sectors available in Lesotho. The Department of Culture plans to have cross-sectoral cooperation with the Ministry of Finance for planning and budgeting and the Lesotho Revenue Authority to assist with assessment and effective revenue collection of CCIs. The Department of Culture will also engage with a diverse set of civil society organizations in research and policymaking decisions. The project demonstrates potential for structural change in terms of generating data that will inform planning and attracting investment. However, the objectives are not specific and measurable. In addition, the project does don’t indicate other ongoing projects that project will complement. Furthermore, while the budget is appropriate for the activities, the overheads costs of $100 appears too low to cover the courier services of the project.

IFCD Submissions details

Recommandation

IFCD Recommendation form - j_casas - 12/16/2022 - 20:07

Submitted by j_casas on 16 déc 2022

Statut de la recommandation:

Non recommended

Financement recommandé:

0.00

Résumé de l'évaluation:

When assessed according to the criteria listed in the evaluations, the experts did not consider this application suitable to be recommended for funding in this round. In accordance with Decision 12.IGC 6, paragraph 7, one (1) bonus point has been attributed to this project as it was submitted by a country that has not received funding from the IFCD.